The movie tells the struggling story of LGBTQ sex workers in Hollywood, LA, inspired by the Italian neorealism and the French New Wave.The movie tells the struggling story of LGBTQ sex workers in Hollywood, LA, inspired by the Italian neorealism and the French New Wave.The movie tells the struggling story of LGBTQ sex workers in Hollywood, LA, inspired by the Italian neorealism and the French New Wave.
Michael J. Middleton
- Client #4
- (as Michael Middleton)
- …
Randy R Roberts
- Congressman
- (as Randy Roberts)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
There's not much here. The story centers around the male hustling trade in LaLa land. What might have been an excellent docudrama exploring the under represented lives of young men on the street completely misses the mark. First of all, the venue is all wrong. The producers and writers might have chosen a smaller town to focus their attention. Nobody cares about LA, it's way too stereotypical. Secondly, the writing is terrible. Then there's the acting which sinks this cinematic ship even further. John, around whom the picture revolves, has no personality whatsoever. We really don't learn too much about what motivated him to end up on the streets in the first place. He doesn't come across at all as a sympathetic character., the others even less so. This viewer wishes that the script had more socially relevant dialogue about the ups and downs of the life of a male sex worker. I also feel strongly that LA was the wrong selection for this yawn filled nonsense. Don't waste your time.
The cinematography in "John" is a standout element, beautifully capturing the seedy yet vibrant streets of Hollywood.
The film's commitment to showcasing the city's underbelly adds authenticity to the story.
Making it easy for the audience to connect with their pligh , the film's unflinching portrayal of the harsh realities faced by LGBTQ sex workers may be unsettling for some viewers. "John" is not a typical action movie filled with adrenaline-pumping sequences. Instead, it's a thought-provoking, emotionally charged journey through a world that remains largely hidden from mainstream cinema.
The film's commitment to showcasing the city's underbelly adds authenticity to the story.
Making it easy for the audience to connect with their pligh , the film's unflinching portrayal of the harsh realities faced by LGBTQ sex workers may be unsettling for some viewers. "John" is not a typical action movie filled with adrenaline-pumping sequences. Instead, it's a thought-provoking, emotionally charged journey through a world that remains largely hidden from mainstream cinema.
I have to confess that I had been tempted to switch off at a couple of points early in the film. I really don't like opera or classical music accompanying a movie. It always strikes me as pretentious. And, as I'm going deaf, I had the subtitles on which irritated me when they flashed up saying "Operatic music playing" when it was actually Vivaldi's Four Seasons. Minor quibbles though as the action drew me in.
I was particularly struck by the camaraderie amongst the rent boys. And the supporting cast was convincing enough to make me wonder if they actually were streetwalkers. Peaches, despite her sharp edges was also a sympathetic character.
John was a bundle of contradictions, in turn kindly (to the congressman) and a thieving scumbag (with the poorer guy in the car). But no eighteen year old should have to carry his burdens, especially the final one.
This, despite some lighter moments, was a depressing film. Totally worth watching though.
I was particularly struck by the camaraderie amongst the rent boys. And the supporting cast was convincing enough to make me wonder if they actually were streetwalkers. Peaches, despite her sharp edges was also a sympathetic character.
John was a bundle of contradictions, in turn kindly (to the congressman) and a thieving scumbag (with the poorer guy in the car). But no eighteen year old should have to carry his burdens, especially the final one.
This, despite some lighter moments, was a depressing film. Totally worth watching though.
"John" (2023) is a bold departure from the conventional action movie genre, as it delves into the gritty and heart-wrenching lives of LGBTQ sex workers in the bustling streets of Hollywood, LA. Drawing inspiration from Italian neorealism and the French New Wave, this film captures the raw and unfiltered essence of their daily struggles.
The movie's narrative is a stark departure from the typical action film, offering a refreshing and poignant exploration of the human condition. It delves deep into the lives of its characters, allowing us to empathize with their challenges and triumphs.
Good.
The movie's narrative is a stark departure from the typical action film, offering a refreshing and poignant exploration of the human condition. It delves deep into the lives of its characters, allowing us to empathize with their challenges and triumphs.
Good.
I can see what they were trying to do with this film, it just did not work.
I can appreciate the attempts to touch upon French new wave but it really does miss the mark.
This is a well worn and weary tale of street prostitution, attempting to blend realism with drama.
But the script is so disjointed and overlong. Whilst it tries to touch upon the different stories of various characters, be they prostitutes or their renters, it rests on cliche and feels too forced.
Whilst I can appreciate the rough edges of the acting (and their are some lovely performances) you need a strong lead, which this film fails at delivering. The lead actor is a one trick pony, utterly failing to portray any complexity or depth to a role which requires it.
It also suffers from some confusion on its style in acting. On the one hand it wants to portray realistic and raw, but then throws in some completely contrived sections.
I understand there are people who will love this, maybe I just think we have moved on from this style - relevant more for a different time in film.
But it is not a total loss for me, hence the 4 stars. Whilst meandering and dull at points, it has some bright moments which makes it worth a watch.
I can appreciate the attempts to touch upon French new wave but it really does miss the mark.
This is a well worn and weary tale of street prostitution, attempting to blend realism with drama.
But the script is so disjointed and overlong. Whilst it tries to touch upon the different stories of various characters, be they prostitutes or their renters, it rests on cliche and feels too forced.
Whilst I can appreciate the rough edges of the acting (and their are some lovely performances) you need a strong lead, which this film fails at delivering. The lead actor is a one trick pony, utterly failing to portray any complexity or depth to a role which requires it.
It also suffers from some confusion on its style in acting. On the one hand it wants to portray realistic and raw, but then throws in some completely contrived sections.
I understand there are people who will love this, maybe I just think we have moved on from this style - relevant more for a different time in film.
But it is not a total loss for me, hence the 4 stars. Whilst meandering and dull at points, it has some bright moments which makes it worth a watch.
Did you know
- TriviaProduced by Joseph Hieu, known for producing 'The Accidental Getaway Driver', an acclaimed feature at Sundance Film Festival.
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 40m(100 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16 : 9
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content