Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters

A nun out for vengeance summons the demon shark. She picks up a hitchhiker, played by Adam Freeman (Reunion From Hell) as a sacrifice to the shark. There's a priest who is sworn to stop the shark.

Party dancer, Kasey, played by Jessa Flux (Murdercise, XXX-MAS) wants to go to the beach in Destin, Florida. She shows up at a client, Claude's house and tries to convince him to take her to Destin. He ends up taking her to Blanton Beach, where the killer shark is.

There's a solid cast from the indie horror community including; Angel Nichole Bradford (Desperate Souls), Roni Jonah (Slaughter House Slumber Party), Ford Winstar, Adam Freeman (Reunion From Hell) and Jessa Flux (Murdercise). I enjoyed seeing all of these actors, but unfortunately I found the first half of the movie to be rather slow. Things don't really pickup until Jessa appears on screen. She's a great actress and always lights up the screen!

Anyway, I enjoyed Shark Exorcist 2 more than the first film. The DVD version has an alternate cut of the film as well as previews for six other films released by WildEye. If you enjoy indie horror be sure to check out Shark Exorcist 2.

If you've seen some of the director's more recent works then you'll recognize several of the people here. I think one of the best things about this film is the editing from Tim Ritter who keeps everything moving at a nice pace. The film obviously isn't taking the subject matter too serious and that's a good thing. The CGI shark looks a lot better than what was used in the previous film and I'd also argue that this CGI shark looks better than a lot of the recent CGI shark films.

This doesn't contain the sleaze and nudity like a lot of the director's other films from the past few years but the CGI kills are mostly entertaining and make up for it. There are also some bloody scenes thrown in. There could always have been more shark kills but that could be said for any shark movie.

Shark Exorcist 2 is much less sleazy than the original Shark Exorcist, but is also somehow much more incompetently made. At times it felt like a Dustin Ferguson movie, because there so much obvious filler. This is really weird coming from Donald Farmer, who while not a master filmmaker, has nearly 40 years of experience. His movies aren't always "good" but they're at least competently made. Also, the CGI shark is somehow worse than the first movie. I'm going to give this movie a 3/10, mostly due to Jessa Flux chewing up the scenery in every scene she's in. Jessa has really become an indie horror juggernaut over the last few years. If you're a fan of hers, this is a much watch. If not, mostly just watch if you're into bad shark movies, which I am.

While I most certainly loathed the 2014 movie "Shark Exorcist", I still opted to watch the sequel, as I had the opportunity to do so here in 2025. Sure, I wasn't harboring the slightest of expectations to the movie. But on the way, way, way off chance that "Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters" might actually be worthwhile watching, I opted to give the movie a fair chance.

The storyline in the movie was nothing to write home about. It was a rather simplistic script and storyline, so don't get your hopes up.

Of course I was not familiar with the cast ensemble in the movie. And while that is usually something I enjoy when I sit down to watch a movie, I have to say that the acting performances in "Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters" just were subpar and proved anything but enjoyable.

The CGI rendered shark looked absolutely atrocious. It is rather amazing that something as laughable as this sees the light of day in 2024. And I absolutely love the fact that the shark in the movie is able to roar like some creature from a 1980s cartoon. Seriously, what were writers Donald Farmer and Jessa Jupiter Flux thinking here?

I am perplexed why Wild Eye Releasing actually spawned these movies.

"Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters" is as bad as the 2014 movie was, so I would not recommend you to waste 74 minutes on this garbage.

It's difficult to fairly review low budget movies and ignore the obvious technical limitations that the filmmakers are working with, but I try to do my best. That being said, I have seen indie films made on shoestring budgets shot well, edited professionally, with decent stories. This movie's technical missteps cannot be overlooked. The camera shakes and rattles when the wind gusts. There's a scene where the camera is obviously set on a table, and when the main character in the scene moves, the camera shakes like a webcam on a laptop. The sound design issues are myriad - with the volume and sound quality wildly varying between shots in the same scene... and the editing is terrible! The last scene of the movie, the conversation between Jessa Flux and the Autumn's friend character (whose name I cannot find in the credits) obviously took place in two very different locales, on different days, using different equipment. There were four directors of photography, and four FULL pages of producers, executive and otherwise. Is there an excuse for this? I can't think of one.

This is a profoundly bad movie, and I can't believe it turned out worse than the first.