A gay man makes a deal with his lesbian friend: a green-card marriage for him, in exchange for in vitro fertilization treatments for her. Plans evolve as Min's grandmother surprises them wit... Read allA gay man makes a deal with his lesbian friend: a green-card marriage for him, in exchange for in vitro fertilization treatments for her. Plans evolve as Min's grandmother surprises them with a Korean wedding banquet.A gay man makes a deal with his lesbian friend: a green-card marriage for him, in exchange for in vitro fertilization treatments for her. Plans evolve as Min's grandmother surprises them with a Korean wedding banquet.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 5 nominations total
Jeffrey Liang
- Lady Shu Mai
- (as Jeffrey Liang 'Miss Shu Mai')
Françoise Yip
- Susan
- (as Francoise Yip)
Featured reviews
A remake of Ang Lee's 1993 classic (in some circles!) currently in theaters which doesn't necessarily rework the premise (a gay man agrees to marry a straight woman so she can gain her papers as a means to impress his traditionalist parents) but broaden it w/more characters to middling results. Gay couple SNL's Bowen Yang & Han Gi-chan are besties w/another couple Oscar nominee Lily Gladstone & Kelly Marie Tran who are trying to have a baby but are short raising cash for some invitro sessions. What can be done? Well since G-chan's grandmother, Oscar winner Youn Yuh-jung, is coming to visit w/news to unseat him as a head of her company, the two couples decide to trick Yuh-jung into thinking G-chan is getting married to Tran (Tran will be paid so she can pay her medical bills) which sounds good but in fact turns the players' world upside down as they try to maintain their ruse which becomes a comedy of errors which'll have audiences rolling in their seats but it doesn't since by adding more characters to the mix & making the film now more gay friendly & overt (something the original didn't do since yes the characters happened to be gay but their lives didn't depend on that fact), the end product ends up being both overstuffed & underfed which when viewed through the prism of Lee's version is a shame & a slog to sit through.
I was very much looking forward to this movie and I was not disappointed I was ready to give it seven stars after only watching the first 40 minutes and in my opinion the trailer , as is often the case, would not give one a fair idea of what the true nature of it is. Sure there's plenty of comedy, but it is really a character study of the difficulties encountered in human relationships and it does that with genuine portrayals of those relationships , couples and parent / offspring, the out in the open and the repressed. The acting and story is gripping and I think you will find yourself totally immersed in them and as unlikely as some of the events may seem, the film never struggles in getting them across, comedy , yes but it deals much more with emotions and there are so many satisfying scenes where that is the primary subject.
Seven point nine stars, script acting throughout, not one person outshines the other and equal weight is given to all of them IE well written, I loved it.
Seven point nine stars, script acting throughout, not one person outshines the other and equal weight is given to all of them IE well written, I loved it.
It's hard to understand why classic films, such as Ang Lee's 1993 classic, 'The Wedding Banquet' need to be reimagined or updated. More times than not, the second attempts don't even come close to the original. The 2025 version of this film is no exception. First of all, they put a west coast spin on what was a quintessential New York picture. That was the first mistake. Secondly, the actors were lame compared to those in the '93 film. The screenplay and direction were awful as well. This is a film that should never have been remade. When you have a perfect product, such as Ang Lee's masterpiece, don't tamper with perfection. This newer picture does nothing to advance the LGBTQ+ agenda in a positive way, unlike its predecessor which was bold, poignant and a major contribution to our community.
Very surprised by all the positive reviews (both critics and movie-goers) of The Wedding Banquet.
My partner and I were very much looking forward to it - but were seriously disappointed.
Various reviewers described the film as hilarious, charming, heartwarming.
We did not see that movie.
It was like spending time - too much time - with neighbors who mostly converse in therapy-speak platitudes, irony-speak chatter and in the case of one of the characters, complain incessantly about their mother.
In addition to the annoying therapy-speak dialogue, the characters were not so interesting in our opinion. Angela's character (Kelly Marie Tran) was especially churlish and unappealing - it was impossible to see why Lee (Lily Gladstone) would have been in a relationship with Angela. For different reasons, it was difficult to see why Chris and Min were together.
The few interesting and thoughtful parts of the movie, in our opinion, were the scenes of Min and his grandmother.
I recall admiring the original Wedding Banquet - will watch it again to see.
My partner and I were very much looking forward to it - but were seriously disappointed.
Various reviewers described the film as hilarious, charming, heartwarming.
We did not see that movie.
It was like spending time - too much time - with neighbors who mostly converse in therapy-speak platitudes, irony-speak chatter and in the case of one of the characters, complain incessantly about their mother.
In addition to the annoying therapy-speak dialogue, the characters were not so interesting in our opinion. Angela's character (Kelly Marie Tran) was especially churlish and unappealing - it was impossible to see why Lee (Lily Gladstone) would have been in a relationship with Angela. For different reasons, it was difficult to see why Chris and Min were together.
The few interesting and thoughtful parts of the movie, in our opinion, were the scenes of Min and his grandmother.
I recall admiring the original Wedding Banquet - will watch it again to see.
I know, I know, as a gay man I was supposed to love this movie (just like I did the original). But sad to say, this remake is not very enjoyable.
They get credit for putting new twists on the plot vs. The original, but pacing is waaaaay too slow and it takes forever to get going. Quite honestly, there's very little humor. The first hour drags and is pretty boring, and it's not until the grandmother shows up that things get interesting. The grandmother, in fact, is the most interesting character in the entire movie. Dialogue is mundane and the few funny lines stand out simply because there are so few of them.
With all the talent they had on hand, this could've been so much better.
They get credit for putting new twists on the plot vs. The original, but pacing is waaaaay too slow and it takes forever to get going. Quite honestly, there's very little humor. The first hour drags and is pretty boring, and it's not until the grandmother shows up that things get interesting. The grandmother, in fact, is the most interesting character in the entire movie. Dialogue is mundane and the few funny lines stand out simply because there are so few of them.
With all the talent they had on hand, this could've been so much better.
Did you know
- TriviaRemake of Ang Lee's 1993 original.
- Quotes
Angela Chen: Everything in this house is gay!
- ConnectionsReferences The Wizard of Oz (1939)
- SoundtracksYoung Hearts Run Free (2023 Edit)
Written by Dave Crawford (as David Bernard Crawford)
Performed by Candi Staton & Benji La Vida
Courtesy of Warner Records Inc./Rhino Entertainment Company
By arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $2,090,228
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $918,598
- Apr 20, 2025
- Gross worldwide
- $2,405,680
- Runtime1 hour 43 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content