A contemporary retelling of Louisa May Alcott's 1868 classic, following author Jo March as she returns home to celebrate Christmas with sisters Meg, Beth, and Amy.A contemporary retelling of Louisa May Alcott's 1868 classic, following author Jo March as she returns home to celebrate Christmas with sisters Meg, Beth, and Amy.A contemporary retelling of Louisa May Alcott's 1868 classic, following author Jo March as she returns home to celebrate Christmas with sisters Meg, Beth, and Amy.
Featured reviews
A much loved story and promising lineup but fell short of expectations. Not enough substance. Scenes were too short and changed too quickly so Jen and Jesse left me wanting more. In my opinion, Laura Osnes should have been Jo. Hers and Trevor's character rang the truest and I'd have loved to have seen her as Jo. I also enjoyed Tanya's character. I've seen some movies with Jillian and I'm sorry to say, the stories change but she's always the same...
Some of the other cast members were so stiff I just couldn't believe the story. They were literally performing for the camera. It would be so great to see some of the more seasoned members of the network give this a try, perhaps with a little more of the original story left in it, maybe a series focusing on each separate sister within the family.
Faith based movies are great when the viewer isn't bombarded with stiff smiles and so much teeth and "niceness" that is so far removed from reality it's not believable. I know these types of movies are made to make the viewer feel good but we need believable characters and story lines that grip. It is possible. I'm also disappointed with the Christmas decorations throughout the movie...it was barely noticeable.
Faith based movies are great when the viewer isn't bombarded with stiff smiles and so much teeth and "niceness" that is so far removed from reality it's not believable. I know these types of movies are made to make the viewer feel good but we need believable characters and story lines that grip. It is possible. I'm also disappointed with the Christmas decorations throughout the movie...it was barely noticeable.
I honestly thought I was watching a high school play. It looked and felt low budget. Jen Lilley as Meg and Laura Osnes as Beth were great but should never be in minor support roles. Jillian Murray was not strong enough to play the lead as Jo. The characters of Amy and Laurie were just space fillers and poorly cast. The casting choices and writing, both dialog and plot lines, were subpar. The entire movie was uncomfortably bad. The one minute of decent airtime was Gladys Knight singing. That was it.
Within the first fifteen minutes it was obvious that the movie was not going to be worthy of a second watch. I stuck it out hoping it would improve. Sadly, it did not.
Within the first fifteen minutes it was obvious that the movie was not going to be worthy of a second watch. I stuck it out hoping it would improve. Sadly, it did not.
It might just be the fact that there were too many characters involved in this movie to do any of them justice. Somehow, this film seemed to both drag in places and gloss-over important story points, at the same time.
A bit more snappy banter between the leads wouldn't have hurt. They needed a better-developed story, even if that meant sacrificing one or more of the other sisters' stories.
The real standout performance here turned out to be from Trevor Donovan. I've seen him in other movies, but I believe this is the first time I've really noticed him as an actor. He did a great job here. Just wish the movie itself was better.
A bit more snappy banter between the leads wouldn't have hurt. They needed a better-developed story, even if that meant sacrificing one or more of the other sisters' stories.
The real standout performance here turned out to be from Trevor Donovan. I've seen him in other movies, but I believe this is the first time I've really noticed him as an actor. He did a great job here. Just wish the movie itself was better.
After reading some of the other reviews, I didn't know whether to expect the greatest movie ever, or the worst.
Well of course it was neither.
I never read the Alcott books, or any of the other "chick" stories, but I am familiar with some of them. People have been making movies loosely based on them forever.
They put in things they think are clever (Alcott Grove, a waitress named Louisa May) that really just make it irritating.
This movie is a modern retelling, and while not a significant achievement in film, is not as bad as some of the reviews I've read.
I agree there could have been a stronger lead, but I haven't seen Trevor Donovan even mentioned, and he was very good.
The whole four sisters thing was overdone, and they didn't really look or feel like sisters. They basically had four lead actresses jockeying for position. That never works.
I do like the GAC is making a concerted effort to include the Lord in all the movies I've seen this year.
I thought this movie was fine. To me that's good enough.
Seven.
Well of course it was neither.
I never read the Alcott books, or any of the other "chick" stories, but I am familiar with some of them. People have been making movies loosely based on them forever.
They put in things they think are clever (Alcott Grove, a waitress named Louisa May) that really just make it irritating.
This movie is a modern retelling, and while not a significant achievement in film, is not as bad as some of the reviews I've read.
I agree there could have been a stronger lead, but I haven't seen Trevor Donovan even mentioned, and he was very good.
The whole four sisters thing was overdone, and they didn't really look or feel like sisters. They basically had four lead actresses jockeying for position. That never works.
I do like the GAC is making a concerted effort to include the Lord in all the movies I've seen this year.
I thought this movie was fine. To me that's good enough.
Seven.
A fellow viewer remarked that this film resembled a high school production, and I wholeheartedly concur. The performances were lacking, and the writing left much to be desired. It is disheartening to see such a beloved story treated in this manner. One notable issue was the dialogue; characters frequently addressed each other by name in a way that felt unnatural. While this approach may have been intended to reinforce their identities as characters from Little Women, it ultimately detracted from the authenticity of their interactions. In reality, conversations are rarely so contrived-people do not typically enter a room with greetings like, "Hi John, my favorite brother." The script contributed to a sense of stiffness among the actors, resulting in performances that felt wooden and unconvincing. Additionally, the two standout performers, Jen Lily and Jesse Hutch, were relegated to minor roles when their talents could have significantly enhanced the film had they been given more substantial parts. As a devoted fan of the original novel and previous adaptations of Little Women, as well as wholesome films produced by GAC, I found this interpretation disappointing. Despite its good intentions, the execution fell short. I would recommend that future productions invest more time in developing a strong script rather than relying solely on the established names from such an esteemed literary work.
Did you know
- TriviaFilmed in Franklin Tennessee, many of the locations are businesses in the downtown area.
Details
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content