Lost Monster Files

Like most shows of this kind, they go around the country investigating some of the creatures from folklore. Unlike other shows they use the library of research from Sanderson to Jumpstart their investigations. Most of the hosts appear to keep open minds during these searches. They interview witnesses, look for evidence, and delve into some of the lore of the creatures. While open to possibilities the cast mostly keep a practical and scientific eye, except one. Brittany, the cryptozoologist, constantly argues no matter what the evidence says that it could be a cryptid. While it is good to not write off other explanations, she consistently writes off everything and assumes all things are true and everything is really just a cryptid and they just didn't find it this time. She's obnoxious and you can tell at times the other investigators are quite annoyed by her. She's the only one who constantly seems like the dumb one and entirely out of place.

This show is not real!

Everything is hearsay and fake!

They are just trying to scare you to get more viewers!!

The dead animals in the show are manipulated!!

It doesn't match reality at all!! They also don't have any licensed experts!!!! Dont watch this program if you are easy to manipulate!!

It's all fake and not true!!!

This show is not real!

Everything is hearsay and fake!

They are just trying to scare you to get more viewers!!

The dead animals in the show are manipulated!!

It doesn't match reality at all!! They also don't have any licensed experts!!!! Dont watch this program if you are easy to manipulate!!

It's all fake and not true!!!

I don't usually waste my time reviewing this type of "find things that aren't there" shows, but since this show has sunk to a new level of low, I felt I had to say something,

That anybody thought it was an acceptable idea to show a man urinating in public and then wiping his hands on the bare skin of a woman, is disgusting. This individual should be charged with assault! I hope his mother is proud of his deviant behaviour in public and how he treats women, he is just a pig!

In addition, that the program management decided to include this in a program that children could watch is reprehensible, there is no excuse for this kind of behaviour or program content. My wife commented that should any man use her as toilet paper, she would feed him to the Chupacabra.

It is indicative of just how unprofessional this group is and why they should not be allowed to produce anything. I hope the network reviews this and cancels it!

Wishing this show was stillborn, have a nice day.

The cryptozoologists in this show are completely blind to the very real evidence they acquire in the show for the things they "can't explain". Luckily there are two people in the crew who don't shrug off the obvious and often stumble upon an actual explanation, much to the dismay of the CZs...

When presented with "inconclusive" on a dna test, cryptozooligists tend to see that as evidence of an unknown species. Instead of a poor sample, which would be almost certain given that I saw zero actual scientific collection methods.

It's over-sensationalized, somewhat entertaining, but ultimately, completely worthless. I wish there were actual analytical minds going through Sanderson's files, instead of people who saw complete fact in his writings and audio, and took them as gospel.

I enjoy the exploration aspect, but the pretend scientific nature is ridiculous.

There is no such field as "zoo-ology", no such practitioner as a "zoo-ologist", and the fact that that they use those terms kills off any pretense of professionalism.

The term's origin is the Greek word "zoe" (in English characters), which is pronounced "zo-ay" not "zoo-ay". The study of life, zoology, is therefore pronounced "zo-ology", and not "zoo-ology", and a person who works in the field, a zoologist, is pronounced as "zo-ologist", and not "zoo-ologist". A person who is not simply an actor, who actually works in the field would know that. They would have learned that even if they took a zoology (zo-ology) course as a college freshman, much less someone who claims to be a professional "zoo-ologist".

I love history and find the legends interesting, but as a person with a graduate degree who works in a STEM field, the unprofessionalism is like nails on a blackboard to me.