Two Christmas Angels with opposite styles must unite soulmates before the holiday while dealing with department downsizing and their own unexpected connection.Two Christmas Angels with opposite styles must unite soulmates before the holiday while dealing with department downsizing and their own unexpected connection.Two Christmas Angels with opposite styles must unite soulmates before the holiday while dealing with department downsizing and their own unexpected connection.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.4527
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
talky, boring waste of talent
If this is Hallmark's attempt at being avant garde, it fails miserably. Talky, boring, and repetitive. Too bad because Ory and Ayres are such good, likable performers. Some of the scenes are so bad they are laughable. But, it's not that funny enough for you to bother with watching it. The new Christmas season kicks off with a resounding thud.
Not entertaining or cute
5.7 stars.
I love both of these actors, so 'A Christmas Angel Match' is a waste of good talent. The story is silly, about angels who are matchmakers. The female angel is Monica the male is Michael (evidently not the Archangel), and their boss is Gabriel? Wait, that's not the correct hierarchy (but let's assume that Michael is a different angel, after all, the narrative says he just got his wings).
Ok, I thought perhaps the film would be fun and lighthearted and interesting, about angels being matchmakers for hundreds (if not thousands) of years. But it's not fun, it's certainly too fluffy, with the whimsical and cartoonish background music and the kid friendly dialogue.
As the story goes, Michael and Monica are competing, trying to win all the accolades and be the best matchmaker in heaven. This story is about them being assigned as partners, required to cooperate and get along. But they butt heads, in their "innocent" angelic ways. Their mission is to match this particularly interesting and more difficult pair of humans. In the process, Michael and Monica fall for each other. It's an odd romantic concept. And when they start to feel the magic, they don't understand it, they are like two juveniles. Gabriel tells them they are "adorable". It's all too sickly sweet and ineffectual in creating a pleasant viewing experience. So basic, so mundane, so childish.
Heaven is very white and bright, you can tell the cinematographer adopted the usual style for the setting, although they aren't on clouds, but the walls and floors are super-white and there is always the bells and simple acts of fake courtesy to give us the impression of adolescent adults with low intelligence and super powers. What a cliche.
The further I got into the story, the more I felt like an estranged audience member. I just don't understand the appeal of this kind of film, but it's a token for Hallmark to spit out a few of these per season. It's obvious there is a target audience (preteen girls?). Oh the humanity that two great Hallmark actors couldn't salvage this movie while Monica attempted to "salvage the mission".
I love both of these actors, so 'A Christmas Angel Match' is a waste of good talent. The story is silly, about angels who are matchmakers. The female angel is Monica the male is Michael (evidently not the Archangel), and their boss is Gabriel? Wait, that's not the correct hierarchy (but let's assume that Michael is a different angel, after all, the narrative says he just got his wings).
Ok, I thought perhaps the film would be fun and lighthearted and interesting, about angels being matchmakers for hundreds (if not thousands) of years. But it's not fun, it's certainly too fluffy, with the whimsical and cartoonish background music and the kid friendly dialogue.
As the story goes, Michael and Monica are competing, trying to win all the accolades and be the best matchmaker in heaven. This story is about them being assigned as partners, required to cooperate and get along. But they butt heads, in their "innocent" angelic ways. Their mission is to match this particularly interesting and more difficult pair of humans. In the process, Michael and Monica fall for each other. It's an odd romantic concept. And when they start to feel the magic, they don't understand it, they are like two juveniles. Gabriel tells them they are "adorable". It's all too sickly sweet and ineffectual in creating a pleasant viewing experience. So basic, so mundane, so childish.
Heaven is very white and bright, you can tell the cinematographer adopted the usual style for the setting, although they aren't on clouds, but the walls and floors are super-white and there is always the bells and simple acts of fake courtesy to give us the impression of adolescent adults with low intelligence and super powers. What a cliche.
The further I got into the story, the more I felt like an estranged audience member. I just don't understand the appeal of this kind of film, but it's a token for Hallmark to spit out a few of these per season. It's obvious there is a target audience (preteen girls?). Oh the humanity that two great Hallmark actors couldn't salvage this movie while Monica attempted to "salvage the mission".
A Christmas Angel Bash
How distant and far gone seem the days when Hallmark produced those three charming movies with Peter Falk playing the role of "Max", the angel! And the levity with which Rachel Boston interpreted an angel in "Christmas in Angel Falls! By 2025 standards, Heaven works like a business corporation with awards for the best employee, petty rivalries and threats to demotions. And it owns a branch that meddles in human love relationships, a match-making industry where angels act like competing agents with a social influencer mentality who are willing to resent and battle the rivals. Here we have a story in which two competing angels, supposedly hundred of years wise, yet with the psychology of poorly developed teenagers, ineptly interfere with two young people, who eventually found each other independently of their meddling. All in order to justify the plot of falling in love with one another, themselves. The side story of the two young would-be-lovers in not even half baked. Despite family, friends, and even angels trying to push them together, they simply show a sparkle of reciprocal attraction in the end, with no explanation of any basis or reason why they should love each other. The basis of the budding love affair between the angels is even more obscure: Ory and Ayres display no chemistry whatsoever, beyond the absurdity of the between-angels relation. What's more, Benjamin Aires appears too aged for the part. It should be time to consider grandfather roles, rather than acting as a young beau. And what with the unshaven beard? He looks more devilish than angelic. If the idea is to make him look more masculine, he does not need that, and he only looks uncouth. The action is confused and some characters seem irrelevant or redundant. E.g., Mirabelle, played by the likeable Amanda Jordan, serves no real purpose but the one of filling time. Without her character the movie would be exctly the same.
The story has few moments which could be sweet, but they mostly feel cliché, superficial, and phony. It could have made some sense if set in the environment of a match-making company. It is totally out of place when Heaven, Christmas, and angels are thrown in. Why involve traditions and creeds rich in faith, spirituality, deep moral values, when the script, the concept, and the writers seem to understand none of them? Spiritual mirth is substituted with farce, intimate joy exchanged for silly acting or shake-the-booty dancing, selflessness end empathy yield to self-serving, clueless pettiness. If I were a Christian I would find this production highly offensive. I am not one, yet I do object to downgrade, or degrade, the values of centuries of traditions and beliefs of people who understand them or practice them. This way we reduce the highest ideals and human values to base mundane woke feasts. Lifetime Channel already ran this course and is phasing out of the Christmas movies business: is Hallmark striving to follow suit?
The story has few moments which could be sweet, but they mostly feel cliché, superficial, and phony. It could have made some sense if set in the environment of a match-making company. It is totally out of place when Heaven, Christmas, and angels are thrown in. Why involve traditions and creeds rich in faith, spirituality, deep moral values, when the script, the concept, and the writers seem to understand none of them? Spiritual mirth is substituted with farce, intimate joy exchanged for silly acting or shake-the-booty dancing, selflessness end empathy yield to self-serving, clueless pettiness. If I were a Christian I would find this production highly offensive. I am not one, yet I do object to downgrade, or degrade, the values of centuries of traditions and beliefs of people who understand them or practice them. This way we reduce the highest ideals and human values to base mundane woke feasts. Lifetime Channel already ran this course and is phasing out of the Christmas movies business: is Hallmark striving to follow suit?
A Pleasant Watch
The premise was solid and the leads were charming and had good chemistry. Some of the other performances might have been slightly wooden, and not everything worked perfectly, but all in all, a pleasant watch with a nice ending. Not sure why some of the other reviews are so negative. I've seen quite a few Hallmark Christmas movies, and I feel like this one fit right in, and was even slightly above average.
Great potential not realized
The concept of the heavenly DCC could work. The sets and costumes are very good. The leads are fine actors and very attractive, but the story just isn't interesting enough. Comparing different methods of matching couples should have been great fun, but it really wasn't.
Early on we learn of a "Legacy of soulmate matches," (matches from past generations) which was a great idea, and should have been fully explored. It should have been the core of the movie. Vintage clothing and settings would have possibly been the makings of a classic.
Unfortunately the romances we witnessed in the movie were not very interesting or humorous, and bouncing between them caused the movie to have no flow. It was actually hard to follow, which should not happen in this kind of movie.
The lack of any chemistry at all among any of the characters is the final nail in the coffin. What could have been great was hard to finish. I actually looked forward to the commercials.
This basic outline can work. It would be a shame to abandon it. A sequel with new couples to match and more humor would be welcome.
C.
Early on we learn of a "Legacy of soulmate matches," (matches from past generations) which was a great idea, and should have been fully explored. It should have been the core of the movie. Vintage clothing and settings would have possibly been the makings of a classic.
Unfortunately the romances we witnessed in the movie were not very interesting or humorous, and bouncing between them caused the movie to have no flow. It was actually hard to follow, which should not happen in this kind of movie.
The lack of any chemistry at all among any of the characters is the final nail in the coffin. What could have been great was hard to finish. I actually looked forward to the commercials.
This basic outline can work. It would be a shame to abandon it. A sequel with new couples to match and more humor would be welcome.
C.
35 Romantic Holiday Movies to Stream at Home
35 Romantic Holiday Movies to Stream at Home
Get your fill of happily-ever-afters with this year's lineup of holiday-themed romantic movies to watch from the comfort of home.
Did you know
- TriviaMeghan Ory serves as writer, producer, and lead actress in A Christmas Angel Match.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Also known as
- Coup de foudre céleste pour Noël
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 16 : 9
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






