IMDb RATING
6.5/10
494
YOUR RATING
A tragic hostage case from 2008 Brazil unfolds through unseen diary entries, family interviews, and media coverage, as a 15-year-old girl is held captive by her ex-boyfriend for 100 hours wh... Read allA tragic hostage case from 2008 Brazil unfolds through unseen diary entries, family interviews, and media coverage, as a 15-year-old girl is held captive by her ex-boyfriend for 100 hours while TV networks broadcast it live.A tragic hostage case from 2008 Brazil unfolds through unseen diary entries, family interviews, and media coverage, as a 15-year-old girl is held captive by her ex-boyfriend for 100 hours while TV networks broadcast it live.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Photos
Bianca Sousa
- Eloá
- (as Bianca Sousa dos Santos)
Everson Alexandre
- Lindemberg
- (as Everson Alexandre Bezerra da Silva)
Maria Jaqueline
- Tina
- (as Maria Jaqueline de Araujo)
Caio del Rossi
- Douglas
- (as Caio Rossi Silva)
Caio Cesar Laranjeira
- Victor
- (as Caio Cesar Avelar Schiavone Laranjeira)
Felipe Souza Ferreira
- Iago
- (as Felipe Souza Ferreira de Oliveira)
Amanda Celi
- Nayara
- (as Amanda Stadler Batista)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
6.5494
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
It's a fascinating story, but this documentary is too padded.
A fifteen-year-old girl is taken hostage by her jilted boyfriend and held for over 100 hours. Outside the flat, a mass of people stand and watch. It's both tragic and disturbing, as the crowd treats the event like a carnival. A young girl's life is in danger, and it's party time on the streets - a grim reflection of a broken society.
I think it's a fair documentary, though not one of Netflix's must-watch titles. If you're interested in crime and human behaviour, there's some intrigue here, but at ninety minutes it drags; forty-five would have been enough. The journalist's comment summed it up well: "It's like driving past an accident and slowing down - you don't like blood, but you can't help it."
There's some interesting footage, but far too many textured cutaway shots that distract rather than enhance. The dubbed voiceovers also miss the mark - the empathy sounds forced. If you can, watch it in the original Portuguese.
You need to be in the right mood for this one - and with slim pickings on Netflix this November (unless you fancy a festive romcom), it might just about hold your attention.
5/10.
I think it's a fair documentary, though not one of Netflix's must-watch titles. If you're interested in crime and human behaviour, there's some intrigue here, but at ninety minutes it drags; forty-five would have been enough. The journalist's comment summed it up well: "It's like driving past an accident and slowing down - you don't like blood, but you can't help it."
There's some interesting footage, but far too many textured cutaway shots that distract rather than enhance. The dubbed voiceovers also miss the mark - the empathy sounds forced. If you can, watch it in the original Portuguese.
You need to be in the right mood for this one - and with slim pickings on Netflix this November (unless you fancy a festive romcom), it might just about hold your attention.
5/10.
Sad and revolting
A repulsive story of how an irresponsible press and an incompetent and incapable police force managed to fail even after 5 days of negotiations in a hostage situation.
The reasons that led to this point do not erase the fact that the girl could have survived if it weren't for the incompetence of those responsible for the negotiation.
The reasons that led to this point do not erase the fact that the girl could have survived if it weren't for the incompetence of those responsible for the negotiation.
Eloá was the least important thing.
In 2008, while Brazil was still processing the Isabela Nardoni case, another tragedy took over the national news: the kidnapping and murder of Eloá Pimentel by her ex-boyfriend, Lindemberg Alves, in the city of Santo André. The standoff, broadcast live for 100 hours, brought the country to a standstill.
After the breakup, Eloá is taken hostage. Inside the apartment, she tries to negotiate and stay calm while Lindemberg oscillates between threats and emotional outbursts. Outside, police and media seem locked in a competition to see who can handle the situation worse: the police, hesitant and disastrous; the media, turning a tragedy into entertainment.
The nonstop coverage created a rare phenomenon, comparable only to events like the Bus 174 hijacking, Columbine, or 9/11: the public watched every second, giving the perpetrator an absurd level of visibility. Instead of focusing on Eloá and the teenagers at risk, attention shifted to Lindemberg - who instantly became a twisted kind of celebrity.
By 2025, there is no debate about responsibility: he was the killer. But the tragedy wasn't his doing alone. The chaos outside the building, the sensationalist media circus, and the long chain of police errors created the perfect storm for disaster. It was a collective failure.
The documentary revisits the case through testimonies from family members, journalists, police officers, and Vitor - one of the teenagers who was also held hostage. Nayara, for understandable reasons, chooses to remain silent. Still, the film loses strength by omitting crucial points: it never mentions the reckless role of TV host Sonia Abrão, who actually spoke with Eloá and Lindemberg live on air; nor does it acknowledge that Eloá's father was a fugitive murderer located because of this case. It's easy to empathize with her mother and siblings - especially Douglas, dragged into the chaos by police incompetence - but not with that man. And the documentary conveniently hides this.
I was 16 and watched everything unfold on TV. I was at home that Friday, a little after 5 p.m., when the police fabricated the story of a gunshot to justify storming the apartment. Several opportunities to neutralize Lindemberg were wasted: a sniper, chemical agents, any truly strategic approach. None were used. And today, more than a decade later, he is alive and serving time in a semi-open regime - longer, in fact, than Eloá lived.
The title Eloá: Refém ao Vivo ("Eloá: Hostage Live") is accurate, but still incomplete. She was Lindemberg's hostage, yes - but also a hostage of a media machine starving for ratings, of a public fascinated by tragedy, of politicians chasing visibility, and of outsiders who interfered in the negotiations. The truth is harsh and simple: her life was never the priority. What mattered was feeding the spectacle. And in the end, the only one who lost everything was the very person who received the least attention.
After the breakup, Eloá is taken hostage. Inside the apartment, she tries to negotiate and stay calm while Lindemberg oscillates between threats and emotional outbursts. Outside, police and media seem locked in a competition to see who can handle the situation worse: the police, hesitant and disastrous; the media, turning a tragedy into entertainment.
The nonstop coverage created a rare phenomenon, comparable only to events like the Bus 174 hijacking, Columbine, or 9/11: the public watched every second, giving the perpetrator an absurd level of visibility. Instead of focusing on Eloá and the teenagers at risk, attention shifted to Lindemberg - who instantly became a twisted kind of celebrity.
By 2025, there is no debate about responsibility: he was the killer. But the tragedy wasn't his doing alone. The chaos outside the building, the sensationalist media circus, and the long chain of police errors created the perfect storm for disaster. It was a collective failure.
The documentary revisits the case through testimonies from family members, journalists, police officers, and Vitor - one of the teenagers who was also held hostage. Nayara, for understandable reasons, chooses to remain silent. Still, the film loses strength by omitting crucial points: it never mentions the reckless role of TV host Sonia Abrão, who actually spoke with Eloá and Lindemberg live on air; nor does it acknowledge that Eloá's father was a fugitive murderer located because of this case. It's easy to empathize with her mother and siblings - especially Douglas, dragged into the chaos by police incompetence - but not with that man. And the documentary conveniently hides this.
I was 16 and watched everything unfold on TV. I was at home that Friday, a little after 5 p.m., when the police fabricated the story of a gunshot to justify storming the apartment. Several opportunities to neutralize Lindemberg were wasted: a sniper, chemical agents, any truly strategic approach. None were used. And today, more than a decade later, he is alive and serving time in a semi-open regime - longer, in fact, than Eloá lived.
The title Eloá: Refém ao Vivo ("Eloá: Hostage Live") is accurate, but still incomplete. She was Lindemberg's hostage, yes - but also a hostage of a media machine starving for ratings, of a public fascinated by tragedy, of politicians chasing visibility, and of outsiders who interfered in the negotiations. The truth is harsh and simple: her life was never the priority. What mattered was feeding the spectacle. And in the end, the only one who lost everything was the very person who received the least attention.
A system failure.
What a sad story. Poor girl, she was a victim of the failures of a system, the police, the media. A story that shows how backward Brazil was at that time. The interviews were very good; this story is moving. The dangers of machismo, mental health, victimization - a whole compendium of a complex web.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- El caso Eloá: Un secuestro en directo
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 25m(85 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content