milescorn's reviews

I dont carry how many of the Roland Winter Chan films I watch, Victor Sen Yong is number two son Jimmie, not sure why or how they got confused. This one pretty different as Roland Winters steps into the Charlie Chan shoes. He was not near as good as Oland or Tolier, but he tries. Mantan Morland steals the show as always, but still a good mystery on a rainy night.

First off I need to say that I have not liked Superman films since Christopher Reeves wore the bright red and blue suit. I didn't like the the Man of Steel movies and could care less about Superman Returns. This film was one of the best Superman movies I have seen since Superman 2. Great job to Warner Brothers for actually going back to what Superman is and not changing his story, not changing who he is. The movie was awesome and the acting was fantastic. This was much better than than the overblown remake about those four other superheroes that came out over the weekend.

What a shame, a new show that I really wanted for its first episode to let us know what really happened to Sam and Al, we did get a brief summary, but what a wasted opportunity to fix that last episode of the original series. I am not saying i didn't like this, and of course they really didn't give fans what they really wanted. But here we go again with a cliffhanger ending and NBC cancels the show. Honestly wished another network would have picked it up just so we could get another season with a complete ending, instead of being thrown into this, here is what you get, garbage. At least someone tried, right? Not as good as the original, but as stated before, what a wasted opportunity to make right, what once went wrong.

I have listened to many Jack Benny radio shows where he talks about how bad this film was, however I think the film is extremely funny. I was happy when it was released on DVD a few years ago and it's one I watch often. But I love these types of movies and I think Benny is in top form here. If you have never seen take a look, even if it's not your cup of tea, you still may laugh out loud. Honestly I wish he had made more feature films, but his radio and TV show is still around for a good laugh. Even if you are not a fan of older movies I still say check out, I highly recommend this film. And that's all I got to say.

It's hard to review a movie that you just don't like, and that it this one, Snow White. I grew up with the original was fortunate enough to see it on the big screen in 1987 for one of the last times it was reissued, that was great. This however was not. I didn't like the musical numbers, and honestly did not care for the CGI. The sets were great to look at, and it appeared that they really tried as I did to like it. Honestly though I do not like remakes and I put this one up there with Phsyco and on the same level as a few other remakes in the past, just didn't think we needed it. But don't use my review to just not see it, make the judgment for yourself as others may enjoy it.

This movie was awesome. I didn't watch it for a long time because I was stupid enough to listen to the reviews. If people thi k this movie is bad, they don't watch enough movies. And if Ryan Reynolds put as much effort into a sequel for this as much as he did Deadpool, could you imagine how good this would be. And if people still thinks this is bad go and watch the movie Things, or Turkish Star Wars, bet you change your mind real quick. I really enjoyed this much better than the last few Marvel movies. And it had just a great mid credits scene. Anyway, regardless this movie was great and so was Reynolds. Don't listen to the negative reviews. Do what I did and watch it for yourself.

Good old Walt Disney would not survive if he were around today. He built Disney and the Disney name to have value when it comes to the family. In 1984 when Disney launched Touchstone Pictures to release the Tom Hanks film Splash, they didn't want to release it under the Disney heading because it had nudity and some foul language. After that there were a string of R rated films. Sure Deadpool is an R rated character that did well under Fox, but would Walt approve of this film, who knows. Now don't get me wrong, I already knew what this was all about as I had seen the first two films as well. I honestly thought they were okay, and I knew what this was going to be too. But when I see children in the audience, because it's Marvel, and I don't see any care for what we used to call morales, it makes me sad. And yes that is where I put poor Walt, because the Morales of his studio has went down too. If you enjoy the film that's fine, everyone has an opinion, this just happened to be mine.

My only regret is that I didn't get to see this on the bug screen. There are people who don't like it and that is fine, I on the other hand love this film.

I think it is not only funny, but I enjoy seeing this film and would much rather watch this and the original series anytime over the new Rob Zombie film or any of the 80's reincarnation.

It is too bad that it didn't do well in it's original run otherwise we would have had a theatrical Get Smart movie with the original cast. Instead we had to wait until The Nude Bomb, which is still way better than the Get Smart movie with Steve Carell.

But man those movies from TV shows back in the day, they were great, from this to Star Trek, they just don't know how to do that anymore, for example the recent Fall Guy. Ugh!

I had owned a 16mm print of this film and have onky watched it twice. When people like to say they have seen really horrible movies, they have never watched this film. Go ahead and say that some of these new movies like Indiana Jones or Madame Web are terrible. Then go and watch this, you might just change your mind.

Sure the plot is something you have seen before. Sure the acting is wooden and stiff. Sure there is enough non tension you could cut it with a dull spoon. Sure there is no one famous in it. But hey, they had enough money and timebto make it. So if you can find it, make sure you watch it.

I have read that this was not received well when it came out. I honestly think people judge too hard with movies. Remember it is only a movie. There is a lot going on in this film but that is what makes it so fun to watch. John Wayne had come a long way from his early films, and if yiu really want to see horrible one, go back and watch one of those "singing Sandy" films. I do feel that Jack Elam steals the show and that is one of the reasons I like this movie so well. It is a shame that they never made another film again, but I do believe that this is one of the films that helped Elam to get the role in Cannonball Run. Not to mention those Disney films and Support Your Local films as well.

All in all this is an enjoyable western, just don't judge it too harshly and enjoy it.

I actually love this film. From the bridge opening to the final rocket launch, this movie is not as bad as others think. If you think this is the worst movie around, then you haven't watched enough movies. Even Stephen King disowned it, and it is probably one the best films made from his work. I mean have you seen Tommy knockers, and don't get me started on Firestarter, boring!! This movie has a lot going for it, and it never tones down on the shock value either. And if you think this film is really bad, dare you to watch Manos, Hands of Fate, or check out the movie Things. Wow so much real junk out there. Anyway, don't listen to the haters, this is a really decent flick, and something King should really be proud of.

This was fantastic and fun, don't listen to people who hate movies, this was perfect. And don't just take my word for it, go watch it for yourself. Readin through the reviews section there was a lot of good things people had to say. For those who rated it poorly, they must not like movies. I do, yes I have issues with remakes, but I have always felt if it was good the first time, why remake it? If it was something poorly done that needs to be remade, go for it. If a story has a great new story, got for it and make a sequel. There were 88 Hopalong Cassidy movies and not all are great, but they are all worth a watch. Don't hate on so.ething till you have watched it, give it a chance.

I love this movie from the first time I saw it back the early 80s. It was one of those, I had never heard of it, westerns my dad rented on VHS. I loved the story back then. As I got older I understood the humor that went along with this film. Something I was not used to being done by Lee Van Cleef, only seeing him in the man with no name films and the great Esacpe from New York.

I will not put any spoilers here, but I will say that if people didn't like it it was because I feel they didn't understand it. And thatbis not unusual in a 70s western of thus type. Just think, films like Blazzing Saddles and others of that nature would be bigger hits. But try it again, I think you might like it.

I doubt very much that the director or producer will ever look at IMDB and read what people are saying about this new, unfaithful, horrible, film that they just unleashed onto the public. I doubt very much that read the book or watched the original film. There was nothing shocking, nothing new, nothing imaginative, and nothing that really ties this film to the original. Even the use of any of the original stars fall flat here making it a total mess. Plus they plan to make two more films? I am so sorry that I spent the money to go and watch this. I should have learned my lesson about David Gordon Green after trying to watch what he did to Halloween. That one was bad too. So, in short, don't waste your time, go watch the 1973 film and stay away from this. And hey, if you do like this film, well, more power to you.

So many bad reviews and they always blame Spielberg. But let's look, the script was written by Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gail, the team that did Used Cars, and then went on to do Bavk to the Future and let's not forget Spielberg was behind both of those comedies as well. Especially since I see that people say 1941 is Spielberg's only comedy. Sure it's loud, yes it has a lot of stuff going on, but is it the worst film ever? Umm no. You want dull, boring, huge wastes of time? Then go watch films like Manos, Hands of Fate or Things. Then tell me how terrible this film is. I actually appreciate the humor that is in this film. The actors are great, and where else are you going to see a film with this cast? If you don't like it or don't get it that is just fine, but for those who have not seen based on the poor reviews, give it a chance. You might just be surprised.

Okay, people will say what they want to about this film, and just to be honest I am not a huge Flash fan, except I really liked the older TV show that only lasted one season. So why rate it an 8 and give it a positive review? Simple,been waiting since 1992 to see Michael Keaton to play Batman again. Was I dissatisfied? Nope, not one bit. I think that was the only reason I went to see this film and was it ever the best thing out there. Don't get me wrong the movie itself was pretty entertaining and that is what movies are all a out. But the best part of this was seeing Batman back in action. Go check it out.

I recently just watched this again for the first time since it came out back in 1992. I forgot how much fun it was. Larry Drake is awesome and he delivers his lines so well with such a straight face. The plot is pretty much standard fare and the acting is so so, but it wasnt made to earn an Oscar amd you are not there for great performances. But I think that Larry Drake should receive some kind of award for his betrayal of the good doctor here. But dont take my word for it. So if you like those early slasher films with a kick, check it out. Just make sure to eat an apple a day to keep this doctor away.

I do not understand why so many people hate this movie, why they lie about it, and then tell you not to watch it. If you love movies like I do, then you will live this movie too! Stop listening to people who hate films, they are almost always wrong. Go watch it and judge it for yourself. This was much better than the last film and it reminded me so much of the first three films. I just feel that people are making it out to be something it is not. This was a great adventure film not to be missed. It was refreshing to see something good on the big screen again. And to be honest the only thing that was a disappointment was the fact that it was not being shown on a 35mm projector.

Not sure why people do not like this movie, it reminded me of the TV show I grew up with, and that show could be scary at times. It was actually really good, people need to realize that movies are there to entertain you. Fine, if doesn't do that, or you don't like this kind if entertainment, that is fine, but just remember, it is a fictional movie, nothing else, stop tripping. If you want reality go watch a Micheal Moore film or a documentary. Bit this film was great, enough said.

What happens when you mix Prom Night with Friday te 13th and set it at Christmas? You get this mess. Throw in a porn star and the cute girl from Ghostbusters, a silly subplot and have yourself a Merry Little Christmas. On a scale of 1 to 10 I gave it a four due to the fact that it had some entertaining moments. But for a better killer Santa flick, Silent Night,Deadly Night followed by Don't Open Till Christmas still are supreme.

Been waiting for this third installment for many years and now that it is here I can't get enough. First movie I have seen all year that I have gone to more than once. All I can think of for people who do not like the film maybe they don't understand it. To me it was more than just a trip down memory lane. It was not a reboot or a remake but a long over due continuation and I would not encourage people not to see it but to take the time and go check it out. Remember it is a movie. Remember why we got to the movies....to escape our every day real life. And this hits on the mark of entertainment.

and make this a perfect trilogy, let it pick up from where the 1982 film ended. I have wanted to see a part two for the longest time. But John Carpenter has to do it. And it has to be just as awesome as this movie is.

I have read a lot of the comments about this movie and I know that it did not do as well at the box office as it could have. There are a lot of things that it seems the other reviewers are not pleased with. I for one am pleased with this film. The film makers went to such pain staking details so that the lovers of the original film would be happy with the outcome. I know I am. I also know that I think that this is better than most of the stuff that Hollywood has been remaking over the past few years. I personally hate remakes and John Capenters The Thing is about the only one that I have really liked. This move is not a remake and that made me happy. Yes I think that some things are better left the way they were made the first time.

For example, I would hate to see a remake of Casablanca, The Searchers, Gone With the Wind, or African Queen. And I know that people have the choice to watch what ever they want. So personally I will watch the originals over remakes almost any day of the week. But here I think that film makers went above and beyond to make a really good movie.