Fuzzy-26
Joined Aug 2000
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
Fuzzy-26's rating
This film depicts (for a 50's war flick) the trials of the 442nd Infantry Regiment, a group of ALL-VOLUNTEER Japanese-American soldiers that fought in Europe against the Axis forces. The soldiers in this unit volunteered from the concentration, err... internment camps to fight for their and our country. They performed brilliantly and became the highest decorated unit in U.S. Army history. Former Senator Daniel Inouye was an officer in the 442nd, too!
While this is not the most exciting war movie ever made, it is certainly worth adding to a collection, especially since it can be bought in a 2-VHS set with "Gung Ho." Of special note is the scene where two German soldiers are trying to make heads-or-tails of of the Japanese chatter on field phone lines they are tapping.
While this is not the most exciting war movie ever made, it is certainly worth adding to a collection, especially since it can be bought in a 2-VHS set with "Gung Ho." Of special note is the scene where two German soldiers are trying to make heads-or-tails of of the Japanese chatter on field phone lines they are tapping.
A previous reviewer says it best when he defended the play against its detractors instead of listing its merits. This is one of the few movies that not only turns a Shakespearean work into a good piece of movie, but a great piece of Shakespearean movie.
Okay, England was not under Fascist control in the 1930's...but the movie works on the supposition that it *could have* been. Before and after abdicating the throne, Edward was known to be pro-Fascist, even meeting with Hitler once! What if Edward had NOT abdicated, once assuming the throne he would have had an American wife? Definitely something not welcome among England upper crust.
While not pointing accusatory fingers this alternate history not only serves as a rough stereotype of Europe prior to World War II but helps to vilify Richard as one evil son of a ... you get the idea. The use of Nuremburg-like banners and visual settings cannot help but associate Richard with Adolf.
Elizabeth and Rivers are similarly given the alternate treatment by showing them as Americans married into the York family as opposed to the historical association with the Lancastrian houses. Either way, it places a slight barrier between them and Richard. Besides, who can resist Robert Downey Jr. shouting, "I have too long borne your blunt upbraidings and your bitter scoffs!" It make me quake as much as Keanu Reeves' British accent in "Bram Stoker's Dracula."
All in all, the essence of the play does come through: Richard is an evil man who is more than willing to destroy his own family and "friends" in his quest for the "seat majestical." Ian McKellan plays the role to the knife's hilt (ahem) and earns my serious respect for it. If you can ignore the window dressing you are left with the heart of Shakespeare's works: characters that make you believe they are real. So what if the recent "Romeo and Juliet" had guns and cars...was the story still not about two lovers kept apart by fate? (I am ignoring Troma's "Tromeo and Juliet" since Shakespeare was not written to include Lemmy from Motorhead...)
I highly recommend this to my friends and anyone else in seeing one of literature's nastiest villains portrayed to his utmost.
In fact...writing this review has made me want to watch it again so I am off to the DVD player!
Okay, England was not under Fascist control in the 1930's...but the movie works on the supposition that it *could have* been. Before and after abdicating the throne, Edward was known to be pro-Fascist, even meeting with Hitler once! What if Edward had NOT abdicated, once assuming the throne he would have had an American wife? Definitely something not welcome among England upper crust.
While not pointing accusatory fingers this alternate history not only serves as a rough stereotype of Europe prior to World War II but helps to vilify Richard as one evil son of a ... you get the idea. The use of Nuremburg-like banners and visual settings cannot help but associate Richard with Adolf.
Elizabeth and Rivers are similarly given the alternate treatment by showing them as Americans married into the York family as opposed to the historical association with the Lancastrian houses. Either way, it places a slight barrier between them and Richard. Besides, who can resist Robert Downey Jr. shouting, "I have too long borne your blunt upbraidings and your bitter scoffs!" It make me quake as much as Keanu Reeves' British accent in "Bram Stoker's Dracula."
All in all, the essence of the play does come through: Richard is an evil man who is more than willing to destroy his own family and "friends" in his quest for the "seat majestical." Ian McKellan plays the role to the knife's hilt (ahem) and earns my serious respect for it. If you can ignore the window dressing you are left with the heart of Shakespeare's works: characters that make you believe they are real. So what if the recent "Romeo and Juliet" had guns and cars...was the story still not about two lovers kept apart by fate? (I am ignoring Troma's "Tromeo and Juliet" since Shakespeare was not written to include Lemmy from Motorhead...)
I highly recommend this to my friends and anyone else in seeing one of literature's nastiest villains portrayed to his utmost.
In fact...writing this review has made me want to watch it again so I am off to the DVD player!
This is definitely one of the strangest alt-indie-freak films I have seen. The characters are almost caricatures, but their actions are choreographed with their lines as they pose around each other.
Madeline Reynard is electrifying as Dr. Caligari, a descendant of the infamous Caligari. She is working on an insidious plot to transfer personality traits between patients in a mental hospital by swapping brain fluids. Her plans go awry when some staff members catch on and she uses a cannibalistic masochist (Shivver Boy) in her experiments.
I definitely recommend this movie for your collection, if not to scare your "normal" friends but for the giant latex tongue.
Madeline Reynard is electrifying as Dr. Caligari, a descendant of the infamous Caligari. She is working on an insidious plot to transfer personality traits between patients in a mental hospital by swapping brain fluids. Her plans go awry when some staff members catch on and she uses a cannibalistic masochist (Shivver Boy) in her experiments.
I definitely recommend this movie for your collection, if not to scare your "normal" friends but for the giant latex tongue.