Embley
Joined Jul 2000
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews109
Embley's rating
really one of the worst films in recent memory. and that is saying a
lot.
what a muddy script and incredibly bad direction. a few people
said to me that at least it looked good, but i thought it just looked
cheesy - very cliche.
one dimensional characters. bad story development. totally
fractured. very predictable. badly edited. REALLY badly written.
hard to tell if the acting was particularly bad (although i can say
with certainty that at least 'the partner' was really awful..) as the
actors had NOTHING to work with.
amazing that this made it to the big screen..
did i mention that it was bad?
lot.
what a muddy script and incredibly bad direction. a few people
said to me that at least it looked good, but i thought it just looked
cheesy - very cliche.
one dimensional characters. bad story development. totally
fractured. very predictable. badly edited. REALLY badly written.
hard to tell if the acting was particularly bad (although i can say
with certainty that at least 'the partner' was really awful..) as the
actors had NOTHING to work with.
amazing that this made it to the big screen..
did i mention that it was bad?
i was very impressed with this documentary-style tv movie. i appreciated the fact that the filmmaker took this approach, giving a sense (at least i hope) of the people on whom these interviews are based, while allowing a buffer zone so that the real people are not subjected to more publicity OR made to look stupid because of their personal beliefs. i thought it was a very wise approach to take and allows more of an unbiased POV in many ways than would a straight up documentary. not to say that this piece was unbiased - it wasn't - and i don't think it should have been. but the filmmaker did not take any low blows and that was refreshing. the way the whole piece was put together was different - i could feel the theatrical aspect coming in, the visuals were much more fractured than a standard tv movie, and i could REALLY appreciate that this was not just another murder story come to life on screen.
thank you for not doing a re-enactment of the crime! i think it was WAY more effective to hear it described by people. i found the laramie project to be horrifying and touching, and i wish more pieces were made that hit at such a gut level. i won't forget this movie.
thank you for not doing a re-enactment of the crime! i think it was WAY more effective to hear it described by people. i found the laramie project to be horrifying and touching, and i wish more pieces were made that hit at such a gut level. i won't forget this movie.
to its (minor) credit, i did jump once, and there were one or two small twists that i couldn't see coming a mile and a half away, but for the most part it was predictable and boring and the writing was pretty vile. the acting was not terrible - the main boy, fenton, was good - but didn't his brother keep calling him curtis? what was up with that - maybe i missed something there.. there were holes the size of bowling balls in the plot. and why didn't matthew mcconaughey move his lips during the film? i don't think it is worth paying much to see.