Balou-6

I like this movie, because I am essentially a HUGE fan of John Belushi. But this film lacked many things that could make this a great movie. First of all, Michael Chiklis HAS NO CREDIBILITY in the role of John Belushi. He doesn't look like him, and every moves he did was a pale copy of the great Belushi ! But, in all, I loved this movie because every biography of great actors or movie legends fascinates me. I found the feedbacks from his death to some parts of his life annoying, but I learned some things about him that I didn't know.

With JAMES BELUSHI to play the part of his own brother could've made this movie A GREAT AUTOBIOGRAPHY.

What's that ? What a bizarre movie ! They said that it was the next exorcist !? NO WAY ! We are far beyond the exorcist. The exorcist is a classic. This is NOT a classic. Maybe some will say that I didn't understand the plot line of the film, that I didn't focus enough on it, but I didn't find much sense in it. There they are three kids with cameras, in a search of the Loch Ness monster ! And by the way, they were lost and they were camping near a river. Everybody knows that if you follow the current of the river, you will find a village, a city or at least civilization ! It didn't cost much to produce ? Well, that 's all that is worth from my point of view .

I loved that movie. Seeing John Ritter again after Three's Company, and the lovely Connie Selecca ! She's so beautiful ! Although it was a typical american movie, ( the beautiful women falling in love with the right guy and dumping the wrong guy !), It was predictable. But it was nonetheless a very good movie. And seeing John Ritter doing his Jack Tripper moves one more time! ( When he tripped in the apartment with his bowl of popcorn when the telephone rang, and when he got down the palm-tree and hurting himself, it was hilarious !) I even taped the movie when it aired on television, just for the pleasure of seeing John Ritter one more time. And Connie Selecca too of course !