myegeno

I liked the film. I think the underlying problem with the movie was that the Sugar Daddy Sugar Baby relationships are relationships that are initiated with the certainty that they will end, where neither party expects loyalty. The fact that the man is married is highly expected and not a problem in most cases, and is even preferred in some cases.

Therefore the horror and tension expected when the couple encountered is somewhat unconvincing.

The management of the crowd in a single location and the psychological pressure created on the girl through (old women-style) dialogues was a high level work.

On the contrary, I don't agree with the criticism that the film is close to theatre or literature than cinema. The camera which moves freely between people and places and the grainy images gave me the sense of Dogme 95.

It definitely did not leave me with the impression that I was watching a courtroom movie or a movie that constantly pursues the question of who is the murderer. On the contrary, I think I watched a wonderful middle-aged family drama with children that does not care about the truth and the court outcome and uses the trial minutes only as a backdrop. And I am very happy I watched it.

"We will show you some silly things, and as the audiences you must understand what do we mean, because this is high-art" type of film making must have gone to the trash of the cinema history.

This is not "telling something", tell us what you want to tell directly.