Mjnanakar

The film 12 Angry Men (1957), directed by Sidney Lumet, is a psychological drama masterpiece that compellingly portrays the power of the jury's reasoning and their crucial role in the justice process. One of the essential aspects that has made this film timeless is the nature of the arguments presented by the jury, which challenges individual biases and goes beyond superficial assumptions as the narrative progresses.

One of the main attractions of the jury's arguments in this film is the diversity of perspectives and prejudices that each member brings to the table. The arguments initially seem shallow, influenced by personal biases. For instance, some members quickly judge the defendant as guilty based on his race, social class, or even their own personal experiences. Such reasoning is quite common in society, and the film intelligently illustrates how these biases can distort the course of justice.

However, one of the most fascinating aspects of the film is the presence of the 12th juror (played by Henry Fonda), who, with careful and logical arguments, gradually prompts the other members to think more deeply. He slowly destabilizes the shallow foundations of their arguments by asking simple and logical questions, reminding them that deciding a person's fate should not be done hastily or based on emotions. His approach is compelling because the film shows how rational reasoning and inquiry can stand against the majority and eventually change the collective opinion.

Ultimately, the allure of the jury's arguments lies in how the film allows the audience to closely observe the mental transformation of each member. From the early moments when people quickly issue judgments to the point where the majority are convinced of the defendant's innocence, the film effectively demonstrates how rational and ethical arguments, in the space of dialogue and interaction, can steer collective thinking towards truth and justice.

The animation "No Dogs or Italians Allowed" is a work that beautifully and carefully portrays a personal and at the same time universal story. This animation, created by French director Alain Ogetto, explores his family history and Italian immigration to France in the early 20th century. Using stop-motion animation techniques and materials such as dough, dry leaves, cardboard and stones, Ogto has created a story that presents a picture of Europe's past as well as personal history.

This work, which was screened at the Annecy Animation Festival and won awards, has been able to establish a balance between tragedies and happy moments. The animation "No Dogs or Italians Allowed" is not only Ogetto's second feature-length animation after "Jasmine" which was shown in Annecy in 2013, but also as a work of art that, with its own aesthetics, combines small and large historical stories with Combines, is known.

In this animation, Ogto not only narrates his family history, but enters into a conversation with it. Through the dialogues he has with his grandmother, Cesare, he portrays the story of love and migration, poverty and struggle, as well as the experiences of different generations of a family. This animation, made in a creative and personal way, has been noticed not only as a work of art but also as a valuable historical document.

Combining poetry and realism, "No Dogs or Italians Allowed" presents small and large historical stories in an original and personal animated style. As an eyewitness account of Italian migration to France, this work is not only artistically but also historically important. This animation, made using everyday objects and puppet characters, provides viewers with a unique and different experience.

Finally, "No Dogs or Italians Allowed" is more than an animation; It is a love story, a historical journey and a work of art that reminds us that every person and every family has a story that deserves to be heard. This animation, with a positive and hopeful look, shows us how we can learn from the past and build a better future.

If you are looking for a deep movie with professional acting and strong dialogues that will make you think and watch TV for hours regardless of the time, I suggest you to watch this movie. Some basic points of the film include the following: firstly, public thinking is very important and can find solutions to many social problems, secondly, writing regulations by officials who are outside the scope of the issue is pointless and useless, and thirdly, it cannot be He did so. It limited individual freedoms, and human nature is such that it can provide relative freedoms for itself in any field, and perhaps the last point is that knowledge is power and power can be achieved by acquiring knowledge.