blaerorot
Joined Aug 2022
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews2
blaerorot's rating
I was surprised after reading some of the reviews criticising this movie.
The dialogue is very subtle and succinct. Norton is very charming and convincing as the con man.
Its very cleverly done and i imagine there's a few con men out there that may watch this and wish the entire movie away because many probably arent as clever as this.
Arterton delivers a performance as we've come to expect and between them both they provide us with an intriguing and believable plot.
Whether it is completely accurate to the actual story i cannot speak to because I'd not heard of it until today, but if the real life conman was as convincing as Norton's portayal, I fear it would take quite the skeptic to see the truth as his character expertly counters almost all suspicion when it arises.
The dialogue is very subtle and succinct. Norton is very charming and convincing as the con man.
Its very cleverly done and i imagine there's a few con men out there that may watch this and wish the entire movie away because many probably arent as clever as this.
Arterton delivers a performance as we've come to expect and between them both they provide us with an intriguing and believable plot.
Whether it is completely accurate to the actual story i cannot speak to because I'd not heard of it until today, but if the real life conman was as convincing as Norton's portayal, I fear it would take quite the skeptic to see the truth as his character expertly counters almost all suspicion when it arises.
1st episode, 1st story about the British warship near Crimea, blaming big data for spoofing the warships position by 300km so the Russians thought it was heading towards the black sea fleet.
Ok, but then it talks about the Russians responding by having 2 coast guard ships following it, and later responding with 20 planes.
If the warship wasn't were big data said it was, by 300km, how did the coast guards find it, and when they did find it, then they were aware of the mistake in their information.
If you're going to twist facts, at least make it plausible.
Ok, but then it talks about the Russians responding by having 2 coast guard ships following it, and later responding with 20 planes.
If the warship wasn't were big data said it was, by 300km, how did the coast guards find it, and when they did find it, then they were aware of the mistake in their information.
If you're going to twist facts, at least make it plausible.