misslolasynastry
Joined Sep 2022
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
misslolasynastry's rating
The music, the filters, the narration, the background noise, waayyy too loud and disconnected from a modern audience. This was a missed opportunity for realism and its as if the editor or producer is more of a horror movie fan than actually performing a paranormal investigation.
You have to do away with all of the fancy editing and just shoot whats going on when it comes to documentaries. Less is more. No filters, no loud horror mystic music, just talk and film. Alot of times silence is just as loud as special effects. The first 10 minutes were hard to watch. And even the interviews were hard to hear/watch due to all of the unnecessary music, white noise, and effects overlays. When you want to capture realism you cant hide behind the extra nonsense. The music should NEVER be as loud as the commentator. The documentary seemed more focused on the music and sounds and trying to invoke fear, than the actual content. It was hard to catch what people were saying and also could barely take it serious.
You have to do away with all of the fancy editing and just shoot whats going on when it comes to documentaries. Less is more. No filters, no loud horror mystic music, just talk and film. Alot of times silence is just as loud as special effects. The first 10 minutes were hard to watch. And even the interviews were hard to hear/watch due to all of the unnecessary music, white noise, and effects overlays. When you want to capture realism you cant hide behind the extra nonsense. The music should NEVER be as loud as the commentator. The documentary seemed more focused on the music and sounds and trying to invoke fear, than the actual content. It was hard to catch what people were saying and also could barely take it serious.
Black American Gen Z here.
I watch a lot of documentaries and decided to give this one a go.
This documentary is about a supposed serial killer. The editing is quite patchy, if you get distracted for one second, youll have to rewind. The first episode was about a murder that led police to the discovery of 13 other killings. They only described that one killing, not the 13 other ones. The second episode, they interviewed a bunch of random people that were irrelevant to the documentary. The only people that qualify for crime interviews are those directly associated with the suspect and victim. Anthropologist, Psychologist, Social Workers were random unnecessary opinions. Then the cringe moment where they try to dehumanize people from tribes. I dont know if thats a typical social issue in India. Serial killers come from all types of backgrounds, the whole bit about the suspect being from a tribe and trying to tie that with cannibalism was an eye rolling moment.
This documentary seemed scattered going here and there and all over the place from interviewing too many irrelevant people and jumping from scene to scene with not much insight of who or what they were talking about. There was a lack of chronological order, a lot of disconnect, no description of each victim that was murdered, just a bunch of random interviews trying to dissect the killer's mind and guess his intentions. By the end of the second episode, all the randoms they interviewed are going on about the suspect's political interests. And I have very little insight on the supposed 13 other murders or any evidence because they gave those things 5 and 10 seconds. Then commences a trial by media, in which I learned nothing else except more of random person's opinions, and turned the series off.
Besides the theatrics and music, this documentary was terrible, they only described 1 murder. The other 13 murders (like 2 or 3 tops) got maybe 5 or 20 seconds, I didnt catch anything about them except the hint of skeletal remains and a diary that was never broken down. The rest of the series is just a replay of all the suspense, bias, and opinion of why or how this guy supposedly killed 14 different people of which are never actually described. I learned nothing as someone who has never heard of this. It definitely makes India's police force look like a joke. You can get anyone to confess if you physically beat and torture them, so when you add that plus the lack of insight on the other murders, it left me with no real case here. (dont get me started on American police, but at least all the details of the case are broken down in public knowledge and scientific evidence). I got nothing from this documentary, just a bunch of opionions, rumor, and storytelling.
I watch a lot of documentaries and decided to give this one a go.
This documentary is about a supposed serial killer. The editing is quite patchy, if you get distracted for one second, youll have to rewind. The first episode was about a murder that led police to the discovery of 13 other killings. They only described that one killing, not the 13 other ones. The second episode, they interviewed a bunch of random people that were irrelevant to the documentary. The only people that qualify for crime interviews are those directly associated with the suspect and victim. Anthropologist, Psychologist, Social Workers were random unnecessary opinions. Then the cringe moment where they try to dehumanize people from tribes. I dont know if thats a typical social issue in India. Serial killers come from all types of backgrounds, the whole bit about the suspect being from a tribe and trying to tie that with cannibalism was an eye rolling moment.
This documentary seemed scattered going here and there and all over the place from interviewing too many irrelevant people and jumping from scene to scene with not much insight of who or what they were talking about. There was a lack of chronological order, a lot of disconnect, no description of each victim that was murdered, just a bunch of random interviews trying to dissect the killer's mind and guess his intentions. By the end of the second episode, all the randoms they interviewed are going on about the suspect's political interests. And I have very little insight on the supposed 13 other murders or any evidence because they gave those things 5 and 10 seconds. Then commences a trial by media, in which I learned nothing else except more of random person's opinions, and turned the series off.
Besides the theatrics and music, this documentary was terrible, they only described 1 murder. The other 13 murders (like 2 or 3 tops) got maybe 5 or 20 seconds, I didnt catch anything about them except the hint of skeletal remains and a diary that was never broken down. The rest of the series is just a replay of all the suspense, bias, and opinion of why or how this guy supposedly killed 14 different people of which are never actually described. I learned nothing as someone who has never heard of this. It definitely makes India's police force look like a joke. You can get anyone to confess if you physically beat and torture them, so when you add that plus the lack of insight on the other murders, it left me with no real case here. (dont get me started on American police, but at least all the details of the case are broken down in public knowledge and scientific evidence). I got nothing from this documentary, just a bunch of opionions, rumor, and storytelling.