kingsemi
Joined Oct 2022
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews1
kingsemi's rating
Leave it Jason Blum to butcher horror history. The first episode completely skips over Lon Chaney and his Universal films like they didn't exist. How can you not talk about "The Phantom Of The Opera"? No mention of Paul Leni's masterworks "The Man who laughs or "The Last Warning ". It just jumps into Dracula as if Universal has never dabbled in the Horror genre. Fun real fact, Lon Chaney was going to play Dracula until he passed the year before because him and Tod Browning had made the lost film "London After Midnight" together.
Following Dracula they talk about the other monsters in the catalog, clumping The Wolfman in with the 30's monsters, cause according to this episode Universal Monster's died out in the early 40's, even though "The Wolfman" was 1941 and jump started the second wave of the shared universe sequels, not to mention the Abbot and Costello stuff which is fantastic. Lon Chaney Jr was the 40's, not 30's.
Another downside to this show was the guest they got to speak on the films, other than John Carpenter and Greg Nicotero, the rest were just people from academia trying to push their narrative on films they had nothing to do with. One goes to say "The Bride Of Frankenstein" was early feminism, cause she rejected the man she was created for. No, she rejected him cause he was hideous and she had yet to realize she was the same as him. Patton Oswald says Dracula played into Kink because people like to be dominated and consumed? UH no.
One also brings up the Hays code and says that it cracked down cause of films like Dracula's Daughter, false, that came out after the Hays code. I don't like people changing history to fit their narrative, there is one truth not multiple.
Following Dracula they talk about the other monsters in the catalog, clumping The Wolfman in with the 30's monsters, cause according to this episode Universal Monster's died out in the early 40's, even though "The Wolfman" was 1941 and jump started the second wave of the shared universe sequels, not to mention the Abbot and Costello stuff which is fantastic. Lon Chaney Jr was the 40's, not 30's.
Another downside to this show was the guest they got to speak on the films, other than John Carpenter and Greg Nicotero, the rest were just people from academia trying to push their narrative on films they had nothing to do with. One goes to say "The Bride Of Frankenstein" was early feminism, cause she rejected the man she was created for. No, she rejected him cause he was hideous and she had yet to realize she was the same as him. Patton Oswald says Dracula played into Kink because people like to be dominated and consumed? UH no.
One also brings up the Hays code and says that it cracked down cause of films like Dracula's Daughter, false, that came out after the Hays code. I don't like people changing history to fit their narrative, there is one truth not multiple.