Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
natportnoy's profile image

natportnoy

Joined Dec 2022
Nat Portnoy - LGBTQ+ filmmaker, actress, producer, editor, screenwriter, intimacy coach, artist, activist, and photographer with a passion for books, cinema, and art.
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.

Badges3

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Ratings253

natportnoy's rating
La Femme Nikita
7.58
La Femme Nikita
Oppenheimer
8.36
Oppenheimer
Once Upon a Time
7.78
Once Upon a Time
Bookish
7.07
Bookish
Whore
5.610
Whore
Too Much
6.38
Too Much
Man Seeking Woman
7.89
Man Seeking Woman
Russian Doll
7.79
Russian Doll
Aged
3.84
Aged
Tomorrowland
6.45
Tomorrowland
A Teacher
6.97
A Teacher
Excision
6.16
Excision
Shining Vale
7.06
Shining Vale
Happy-Go-Lucky
7.07
Happy-Go-Lucky
High Potential
7.66
High Potential
Ludwig
8.18
Ludwig
And Mrs
5.87
And Mrs
Baligtaran
5.33
Baligtaran
Sweetpea
7.23
Sweetpea
Monsters
7.86
Monsters
Hysteria!
7.06
Hysteria!
Newness
6.32
Newness
Shéhérazade
7.18
Shéhérazade
#275 - Jennifer Connelly
9.17
#275 - Jennifer Connelly
Poker Face
7.89
Poker Face

Lists5

  • nice
    • 0 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Aug 24, 2024
  • people I worked with
    • 0 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Jun 06, 2023
  • N
    • 0 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Jun 06, 2023
  • me
    • 0 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Jun 06, 2023
See all lists

Reviews5

natportnoy's rating
Newness

Newness

6.3
2
  • Jul 24, 2025
  • Neither spit nor swallow

    Open

    Open

    2.4
    1
  • Jul 4, 2025
  • Privilege

    Films can be done in many different ways, we've got so many genres, allowing all kind of artistic freedom. With this technology, all kinds of props laying around, resources, masterpiece films accompanied by critical analysis, tutorials on lighting, equipment, acting, editing, etc. Yet, this film was made, and it was made in a way that shows no thought, no skills, no preparation, dedication, ideas, also no interest in creation, only in attention. The creator was apparently inspired by the love for the horror films; I wonder which ones, and I realise it must be other amateur, no-budget school films. Please stop justifying it with the 0 budget, people create from scratch all the time, I've seen more thought-through films made during 4h workshops in some small city of an economically challenged country. There are entire award-winning TV series shot with DSLR cameras... One doesn't need any budget to shoot In Focus, content creators do it every day, yet not those people. All I see in this "film" is privilege, waste, and laziness. This could have been a campy, satirical mix of genres and mediums, experimental, and full of creative mistakes. It's not, and there is no learning process here.
    Poolman

    Poolman

    4.0
    2
  • Aug 3, 2024
  • Shallow pool

    I'm not sure who this movie is for. The premise is kind of Noir film + Big Lebowski, and the main character is surely peculiar, as are his friends, but unlike the cult classic, nothing they say feels funny nor special; it's like being stuck in a room with strangers who are not very bright, who have smoked something, and are trying to make a conversation. It's tiring. It doesn't help that everything feels very slow and sleepy, and the plot is so obvious that even a child would figure it out, while eyes rolling. Maybe that was the point, to play with Noir genre expectations. But every film, regardless of genre, should have some element of surprise, meaning, and depth; otherwise, what's the point of making the film and what's the point of watching? I can't see those here. Maybe it's about boredom.
    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.