fboom-02083
Joined Jan 2023
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews10
fboom-02083's rating
Alien 1979 and Aliens 1986 were so good that one can not believe the third film belongs to the same franchise. It is a ridiculously bad film, even worse than Resurrections. Alien 3 feels like a jail film not a space film. They killed one of the best characters in Hicks, what? Seriously? They could have taken the script from Aliens comics released by Dark Horse comics, which was a far far better story than this ridiculously bad film. This is the worst film in the series by far and it's sad how they made a mockery of one of the best best science fiction films of all time.
John Rambo is the first true action hero and that was pioneering of an action hero. Stallone was the top draw in the industry and Arnold was just chasing Stallone. Imagine if Arnold never got Cameron and Terminator, he would have still been giving those one liners and nothing else. Commando was just another attempt to cash on the success of First Blood, it was also released in the same year as First Blood: Part 2 but later. Arnold just looked like a dumb piece of muscle mass and the movie was boring as hell, some nice music though I would say. Overall a 2 out 10. The box office numbers of Commando was way too low than Rambo 2 released earlier the same year as mentioned above. The movie is to be honest very cliche and boring up until the climax, then you get that mindless action sequence and that's about it.
It's hilarious that the production team call the movie a sci-fi tale. Throwing in terms like 'Space & time' and 'electromagnetic fields' doesn't make a poorly executed fantasy film a sci-fi film. The acting by the main character is just expressionless, he carries the same constipated face throughout the movie. Bollywood needs to grow, it's too easy for the rich people to make movies in India, without any sort of talent and skill. The film is a prime example of that. The concept was okay but copied from Hollywood film Outpost (2008). The antagonist (Pishach) played by Sourabh Raj Jain, portrayed as a man from 1940s talks and behaves like a 2020s man. No work is done for the authenticity of the period the movie was set in. Poor and lazy film-making because Indian audience will accept anything if there's proper marketing. The protagonist Sudhanshu Rai's acting skills are 0.5 out of 10. He literally carries the same facial expressions throughout the movie, you just don't feel for the character. Super bad film-making. People calling it a masterpiece, have seriously not watched good content yet.
Recently taken polls
1 total poll taken