anakin_starkiller
Joined May 2002
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews2
anakin_starkiller's rating
I don't understand the past comments. Sure this movie doesn't reach the standard of the series, but this wasn't the purpose of this movie. The sidekicks on the EU are very good and laughable, and the history connections are simply good! The Austrian movie standard isn't high, as one mentioned before, I disagree. There are some really good movies, also with Roland Dueringer and Alfred Dorfer, and also directed by Harald Sicheritz. Hinterholz 8 should be a better movie than this? I think the one who has written this comment, didn't understand this movie. Everybody who's excepting a 90min episode of MA2412 wouldn't like it. For everybody else, watch it and enjoy it. 8/10
Van Dien and Denise Richards are looking exactly like plastic people in Barbies Wonderland. The plot is really bad and the special effects are worse. In 1997 it had be possible to create more realistic star ships. The bugs looked ok but not exactly good. The army camp scenes where ok, and I enjoyed the acting of Clancy Brown as Career Sgt. Zim, and Michael Ironside as Lt. Jean Rasczak. Most irritably was the use of ordinary machine guns versus the giant bugs. This is a SF movie. I never read the book, and I think the use of machine guns bases on the originally story, but directors never give too much on books (look at LotR). Why did'nt they use more grenades or other heavy weapons. I give a 3 out of 10.
Recently taken polls
1 total poll taken