rhinehart-72230

The negative reviews don't understand the fact that Tony is such an accurately drawn character of a teacher who is no longer needed. I've not watched it all yet,and if it ends with his character doing something dubious it's cheap drama that doesn't really explore the normality of life at the wrong end of the spectrum, but if it takes that slice of normality and runs with it we could be seeing something a little interesting and a lot realistic, now before I go on I've got to lay my cards on the table and say that while I have just retired, I've never felt happier and think teaching is a great profession, although people often face the large sacrifices being made.

A film with characters so devoid of anything approaching life, you don't want anybody to succeed. If you're going to borrow from Highsmith, at least get it right. So many lot holes that allow logic to seep away, and acting of the 'Aren't we all deep and meaningful' type. It's a style over substance mess.

For a masterclass in this genre watch the Talented Mr Ripley and see where crafted performances get you. They could have even used the television show Hustle as a template and carried it off. Only Pike and Grant coming out of this clutching at anything above mediocrity. I'm also mystified by a butler who seems to be in the wrong film.

It's really badly written, full of secondary characters who are awful and leads who seem to be phoning in their performances, The bad kid is out of his depth and just a stereotype. This fails in humour or warmth that is part of what we love in our Christmas viewing. I so wanted Nesbitt to be engaging, but he's swamped by a script that has plot points you can spot a mile off. The two police people really scrape barrels lower than a dachshund's stomach and it all feels like a production meeting on Friday afternoon after a liquid lunch where the crew were killing themselves laughing. This is why people stick to the Christmas stuff they love.