Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
m_owaismushtaq's profile image

m_owaismushtaq

Joined Feb 2024
My IMDb Rating Criteria

10 ⭐ – Masterpiece: Absolutely loved it. Unique concept or theory, stands on its own with no dependency. Rewatchable multiple times.

9 ⭐ – Top Favorites: Loved it (e.g., Marvel/DC movies, favorite web series). Enjoyed enough to watch at least twice.

8 ⭐ – Really Good: Strong story, romance, biography, or overall solid film/series. Works well with or without sequels. Liked it, but probably won’t rewatch.

7 ⭐ – Decent: It was okay and watchable, but didn’t really excite or leave a strong impact.

6 ⭐ – Average: Just alright, nothing special.

5 ⭐ – Time Pass: Barely held my interest. Not something I’d recommend.
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.

Badges4

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Ratings1.1K

m_owaismushtaq's rating
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning
7.38
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning
F1: The Movie
7.89
F1: The Movie
Superman
7.38
Superman
Jurassic World: Rebirth
5.97
Jurassic World: Rebirth
Aap Jaisa Koi
5.86
Aap Jaisa Koi
The Old Guard 2
5.16
The Old Guard 2
How to Train Your Dragon
7.88
How to Train Your Dragon
My Oxford Year
5.95
My Oxford Year
Days of Thunder
6.15
Days of Thunder
Sanam Teri Kasam
7.65
Sanam Teri Kasam
The Amateur
6.57
The Amateur
The Layover
4.85
The Layover
Jumper
6.18
Jumper
Thunderbolts*
7.28
Thunderbolts*
Heads of State
6.45
Heads of State
Snow White
2.15
Snow White
Ghosted
5.87
Ghosted
Band Baaja Baaraat
7.27
Band Baaja Baaraat
Detective Sherdil
5.15
Detective Sherdil
Ae Dil Hai Mushkil
5.95
Ae Dil Hai Mushkil
Jab Harry Met Sejal
5.15
Jab Harry Met Sejal
Patiala House
5.76
Patiala House
Taken 3
6.07
Taken 3
Taken 2
6.27
Taken 2
Taken
7.78
Taken

Reviews1

m_owaismushtaq's rating
The New Mutants

The New Mutants

5.3
5
  • Mar 3, 2024
  • Not Much Expected.

    If your watchlist happens to be devoid of any other options, then by all means, go ahead and explore it. I, personally, found neither an element of horror nor a mysterious undertone within it. Reflecting on the aspect of action, my memory fails to conjure up any recollection of scenes that could be categorized under such a genre.

    Considering the potential location or site in question, it is undeniable that the characters exhibited a certain level of likeability. These characters possessed powers that were slightly modified, offering a unique twist to the narrative. It's worth noting that these modifications, while not groundbreaking or entirely unprecedented, added a layer of intrigue to the overall storyline.

    As we delve into the intricacies of this possible site, one cannot ignore the charm exuded by the characters. Their likeability is not confined to the conventional norms but rather stems from the nuanced alterations in their abilities. These modifications, though subtle, contribute to the narrative's overall appeal, offering a refreshing take on the familiar.

    Returning to the topic of the watchlist, the absence of alternatives prompts one to give this particular option a chance. While I may not have perceived it through the lens of horror or mystery, there exists a subjective lens through which individuals interpret and engage with content. The absence of explicit horror or mystery elements does not necessarily diminish the potential enjoyment derived from the narrative's other facets.

    Contemplating the action sequences within, a haze clouds my memory, and I struggle to recall any specific scenes that align with the characteristics of traditional action sequences. The nebulous nature of this recollection suggests that, if present, these scenes failed to leave a lasting impression. It raises the question of whether the narrative relies on action as a central element or if it explores other thematic dimensions that resonate differently with the audience.

    Turning our attention to the possible location or setting, it becomes evident that the characters play a pivotal role in shaping the narrative landscape. Their likeability serves as a key component, creating an emotional investment for the audience. The modification of their powers, while not groundbreaking, introduces an element of unpredictability, challenging the audience's expectations.

    In conclusion, if your watchlist faces a shortage of alternatives, exploring this particular option might offer a unique perspective. The absence of explicit horror or mystery elements does not preclude the potential enjoyment derived from the characters' likeability and the nuanced modifications in their powers. As memory falters in recalling action sequences, the narrative's reliance on this element remains uncertain. Nevertheless, the characters and their modified abilities contribute to the story's allure, presenting an opportunity for a distinctive viewing experience.

    Recently taken polls

    15 total polls taken
    Superheroes Alternative Names
    Taken 1 week ago
    Ben Affleck in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)
    Favorite Sci-Fi/Fantasy TV Villain
    Taken 1 week ago
    Richard Brake in Game of Thrones (2011)
    Best Dragon Moment in ''Game of Thrones''
    Taken 1 week ago
    Emilia Clarke in Game of Thrones (2011)
    Face-Off: Thor vs. Shazam
    Taken 1 week ago
    Chris Hemsworth in Thor: The Dark World (2013)
    Characters Who Fly
    Taken 1 week ago
    Christopher Reeve in Superman (1978)

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.