aachmanshekhar
Joined Apr 2024
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings34
aachmanshekhar's rating
Reviews29
aachmanshekhar's rating
A solid film that compellingly portrays the perils of a ruthless, "dog-eat-dog" mindset, capturing the intense, cutthroat ethos of figures like Roy Cohn and Donald Trump without resorting to oversimplified villainy.
Sebastian Stan and Jeremy Strong deliver standout performances that steer clear of parody or excess. Their nuanced portrayals of characters often depicted as exaggerated or one-dimensional bring depth and believability to the narrative. Stan's decision to avoid mimicking Trump's typical portrayal, as seen in comedic skits, is particularly effective and lends weight to the film's story.
The direction and acting are strong throughout, but the film would have benefitted from better editing. As it stands, key details and moments of character development are glossed over, leaving gaps that force viewers to infer pivotal elements of the story. This can disrupt engagement, as abrupt narrative jumps detract from the scene's impact and weaken the overall flow.
One notable misstep is the inclusion of the sexual harassment scene, which feels unnecessary and out of sync with the established character arcs and narrative. Without clear verification or context, it adds little to the story and disrupts the film's coherence.
Despite these minor issues, the film is an insightful look at the psyche of some of the most influential figures in recent history. It's a gripping watch that balances drama and real-world complexity, offering food for thought long after the credits roll.
Sebastian Stan and Jeremy Strong deliver standout performances that steer clear of parody or excess. Their nuanced portrayals of characters often depicted as exaggerated or one-dimensional bring depth and believability to the narrative. Stan's decision to avoid mimicking Trump's typical portrayal, as seen in comedic skits, is particularly effective and lends weight to the film's story.
The direction and acting are strong throughout, but the film would have benefitted from better editing. As it stands, key details and moments of character development are glossed over, leaving gaps that force viewers to infer pivotal elements of the story. This can disrupt engagement, as abrupt narrative jumps detract from the scene's impact and weaken the overall flow.
One notable misstep is the inclusion of the sexual harassment scene, which feels unnecessary and out of sync with the established character arcs and narrative. Without clear verification or context, it adds little to the story and disrupts the film's coherence.
Despite these minor issues, the film is an insightful look at the psyche of some of the most influential figures in recent history. It's a gripping watch that balances drama and real-world complexity, offering food for thought long after the credits roll.
Speak No Evil is a gripping thriller that hits all the right notes of the genre, delivering a well-paced and tension-filled experience. The characters are well-developed without any unnecessary exposition, allowing the plot to build intensity from the very first scene and sustain it until the end.
One of the standout aspects is the logical decision-making of the characters-something that often falters in thrillers. Every action feels organic and driven by the narrative rather than contrived for the sake of the plot. This natural flow keeps the movie moving at a brisk pace while clearly establishing key plot points.
The action sequences could have been slightly more polished, though this isn't a major issue. My only minor critique is the portrayal of the male protagonist, who seems to exhibit traces of emasculation throughout the film. I expected a climactic moment that would offer him some form of redemption or personal growth, but this was instead given to the female lead. While this choice subverted expectations and added an element of unpredictability, it left a small gap in the male character's arc.
James McAvoy is, as expected, in top form, delivering a standout performance. The supporting cast also does justice to their roles. The crisp screenplay and sharp editing significantly elevate the film, making it more engaging than it otherwise might have been.
One of the standout aspects is the logical decision-making of the characters-something that often falters in thrillers. Every action feels organic and driven by the narrative rather than contrived for the sake of the plot. This natural flow keeps the movie moving at a brisk pace while clearly establishing key plot points.
The action sequences could have been slightly more polished, though this isn't a major issue. My only minor critique is the portrayal of the male protagonist, who seems to exhibit traces of emasculation throughout the film. I expected a climactic moment that would offer him some form of redemption or personal growth, but this was instead given to the female lead. While this choice subverted expectations and added an element of unpredictability, it left a small gap in the male character's arc.
James McAvoy is, as expected, in top form, delivering a standout performance. The supporting cast also does justice to their roles. The crisp screenplay and sharp editing significantly elevate the film, making it more engaging than it otherwise might have been.
This movie struggles to find its identity, failing to be a comedy, a thriller, or even a character study. It's simply all over the place.
As a comedy, it falls flat, delivering hardly any laughs. The jokes are juvenile, and the humor is almost non-existent. The plot is painfully predictable-if I asked ChatGPT to write a script based on the trailer, it would likely produce something just as unoriginal and unfunny.
Akshay Kumar and Ammy Virk manage to squeeze out a few laughs in the 2+ hour runtime, but the rest of the cast seems lost. They fail to grasp the comedic tone, playing their roles without any real flair. Fardeen Khan, in particular, is out of his depth, exposing his limited acting range and feeling out of place throughout the film.
The movie also suffers from a lack of internal consistency. For example, Fardeen Khan's character is supposedly a School PT teacher, yet he shows up to a wedding in Jaipur driving an open Jeep Wrangler. It's details like this that further disconnect the audience from the story.
In the end, this film fails to deliver on any front, leaving viewers questioning what it was even trying to achieve.
As a comedy, it falls flat, delivering hardly any laughs. The jokes are juvenile, and the humor is almost non-existent. The plot is painfully predictable-if I asked ChatGPT to write a script based on the trailer, it would likely produce something just as unoriginal and unfunny.
Akshay Kumar and Ammy Virk manage to squeeze out a few laughs in the 2+ hour runtime, but the rest of the cast seems lost. They fail to grasp the comedic tone, playing their roles without any real flair. Fardeen Khan, in particular, is out of his depth, exposing his limited acting range and feeling out of place throughout the film.
The movie also suffers from a lack of internal consistency. For example, Fardeen Khan's character is supposedly a School PT teacher, yet he shows up to a wedding in Jaipur driving an open Jeep Wrangler. It's details like this that further disconnect the audience from the story.
In the end, this film fails to deliver on any front, leaving viewers questioning what it was even trying to achieve.