Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsHoliday Watch GuideGotham AwardsSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Mister-GTA's profile image

Mister-GTA

Joined Sep 2024
I am a huge movie buff (every room has at least 1 TV - including my bathrooms lol) and I always look to IMDb for a summary, cast/crew details, viewing the trailer, and reading what others think of the film - although lately I'm getting fed up with IMDb's lack of transparency in allowing so many bogus/paid high reviews, and deleting the honest low reviews.

Nothing is worse than clicking on a review, only to see a plot summary. A film review should emphasize the positive and negative attributes of a film - there are separate sections for summary and plot outlines. I know some top pro film critics usually give a summary, and some of those don't even rate their viewing experience, and I question why they are a "critic". You won't get that with me - I'm all about the entertainment value and viewing experience.

What I aim to critique are the key factors that make a film: directing, writing, cinematography, editing, casting, S/VFX, length/pace, sound/score, entertainment value, etc.

I also take into account the production budget and experience of the filmmakers. You cannot equally compare a big-budget Hollywood blockbuster production with A-list actors to a low-budget indie production with B-list actors. I have much respect for new/up and coming filmmakers, and I rate them fair based on what they have to work with. You may see a B low budget film that you may not like get an 8/10, and a big A-film Hollywood blockbuster get a 6/10, only because the A film had everything it needed to be great, and the B film worked with very little (experience, budget, etc.) yet was impressive - all factors considered.

Thus it will be very rare any movie will get a 1 (unless it's riddled with fake reviews from cast, crew and friends) or a 10 (unless it is perfection in every category above) from me, but instead will range between that scale - also taking into account the filmmakers experience, budget, etc. As a rule, anything I rate either a 7 or 8, I liked enough that I will watch it again and still highly recommend. The lower numbers will be more of a critique for the filmmaker in areas they need to improve, as well as details for the potential audience to evaluate if that film is still worth seeing (e.g. loud constant annoying score - maybe you don't mind that) and will satisfy their expectations.

Additionally, those who give a film a 1/10 annoy me. Every film should have some good qualities, and it's a "scale" between 1-10, not 1 "or" 10. I've seen some reviewers give a 1 because the film isn't out yet so they think it's a fake review; Films do have early screenings at film festivals, early releases at various countries or distributors, and "award consideration" pre-releases to certain viewers and critics.

But what burns me the most, is when filmmakers spam and shill their IMDb account with ridiculous comments and clearly fake 9 & 10/10's. IMDb is a transparent opinion-based forum that relies on honest reviews from its members. Spamming a movie with many fake high reviews only tells me that the filmmakers don't even have faith in their own production, and thus have to lie to their potential audience into watching their movie. That's just pathetic, and an embarrassment to the industry and the real filmmakers out there trying their best and being honest.

The best way to see if a review is fake, click on the username; if one or a few reviews (usually the same date/s), a new account, or an account with many IMDb film criteria entries (plot, photos, summaries, film specs, etc.), that's usually a filmmaker or crew upvoting their own film - although I have myself entered/contributed missing relevant details/plot summaries etc. that I found elsewhere (Wiki, RT, etc) and I'm not a filmmaker. So, do every IMDb member a favor and report that fake review, and if that film has many 10/10, down-vote them all (and report) and up-vote the real honest reviews. It may not stop the filmmaker and his crew from posting more fake reviews, but at least all the up and down votes from members like you may help them from not wasting their time to see a flagrantly upvoted film.

Also if you see many shill fake high reviews, chances are your honest low review will get reported and deleted by all the new fake accounts. Simply keep reposting and reporting/downvoting the phony reviews. And do what I and most of the users who notice their honest review got deleted... repost and lower your rating to a 1/10. If you see lots of those along with many high reviews, it's just the honest members being angry and lowering their score in hopes of offsetting the falsely high ratings that IMDb overlooked as spam.

And if you're that filmmaker, cast/crew creating the fake upvotes, you are doing more harm than good for your own film; Members will give you the 1 for every 10/10 you post, when they may have given you a 6 or 7, as I would and have.

Finally, none of my reviews will ever by biased or paid for. Every rating and review will be based on my personal opinion using factors that professional critics use (and in considering everything I've said above) - instead of a film summary, and my exact rating and review can also be found on Rotten Tomatoes, and many other entertainment review outlets.

Badges2

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Watchlist12

The Engineer
7.5
The Engineer
The Chronicles of Riddick
6.6
The Chronicles of Riddick
The Shawshank Redemption
9.3
The Shawshank Redemption
Mad Max: Fury Road
8.1
Mad Max: Fury Road
The Martian
8.0
The Martian
Alien: Covenant
6.4
Alien: Covenant
Prometheus
7.0
Prometheus
Snowpiercer
7.1
Snowpiercer
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
7.6
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
John Wick
7.5
John Wick
Interstellar
8.7
Interstellar
Shot Caller
7.3
Shot Caller

Reviews53

Mister-GTA's rating
Wildcat

Wildcat

3.9
5
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • ytho?

    Wow that was so painfully pedestrian, predictable and boring. It's every film we've seen in this genre, but with all the cliched overused boring parts. Even with fairly decent pacing, the normally quick runtime of 99 mins felt like I was watching this for almost 3 hours. Just a bunch of blah blah nonsense dialogue and long dragged out extended scenes thrown in with the occasional decent action choreography. I'm a big fan of KB but she deserves much better than this, as do mostly all the other cast, who tried their best with the horrible screenplay they had to work with. Both the writer and director need to find new hobbies, as filmmaking is not one of them. A very generous 5/10 for decent cast performances and what little action there was.
    Violent Ends

    Violent Ends

    5.9
    5
  • Nov 21, 2025
  • Great acting, horrible filmmaking.

    Great acting, horrible filmmaking. I mean what a convoluted mess with so many plot and technical issues. My big complaint is who's related to who in what way and how and what business side are they on?

    Writer and director John-Michael Powell had good intentions, and was only sucessfull in directing his cast properly, as all actors performances were excellent. But telling the story via screenplay and directing was a huge failure. It was overly frustrating trying to keep up with who's who and what role do they play. Such a missed opportunity had a little more effort gone into the filmmaking.

    It's a generous 5/10 all going to the cast.
    Exit Protocol

    Exit Protocol

    3.6
    3
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • Ugggh this was painfully bad

    Even going into this I was expecting a B-grade movie, and as a fan of Lundgren and M. J. White, I figured it'd still be somewhat watchable, but man I was wrong.

    Yes, Lundgren and M. J. White pulled their own weight as they usually do, but Scott Martin was just cringe to watch and listen to with such horrible acting and even worse dialogue. And no way he was even a littler bit convincing as a hitman let alone and kind of action guy.

    But even worse was the horrible directing by Shane Dax Taylor, who clearly also failed to direct his cast effectively, but even more worse than the directing, was the ridiculous nonsense writer Chad Law put together in this screenplay. Every terrible cliche was in this movie. And a 5th grader can come up with better dialogue for the actors than most of the cringe eyeroll verbal diarrha that was said. I mean how does any writer with 27+ writing credits come up with such boring, cliched and convoluted nonsense? Even the very short 84 min runtime felt endless with the long dragged out and mostly pointless scenes, slow pacing and choppy editing.

    Law, Taylor and Martin need to find new hobbies, as filmmaking/acting is not one of them.

    It's a very generous 3/10 only out of symathy for Lundgren and M. J. White having to work with such nonsense they were given.
    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.