Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Mister-GTA's profile image

Mister-GTA

Joined Sep 2024
I am a huge movie buff (every room has at least 1 TV - including my bathrooms lol) and I always look to IMDb for a summary, cast/crew details, viewing the trailer, and reading what others think of the film - although lately I'm getting fed up with IMDb's lack of transparency in allowing so many bogus/paid high reviews, and deleting the honest low reviews.

Nothing is worse than clicking on a review, only to see a plot summary. A film review should emphasize the positive and negative attributes of a film - there are separate sections for summary and plot outlines. I know some top pro film critics usually give a summary, and some of those don't even rate their viewing experience, and I question why they are a "critic". You won't get that with me - I'm all about the entertainment value and viewing experience.

What I aim to critique are the key factors that make a film: directing, writing, cinematography, editing, casting, S/VFX, length/pace, sound/score, entertainment value, etc.

I also take into account the production budget and experience of the filmmakers. You cannot equally compare a big-budget Hollywood blockbuster production with A-list actors to a low-budget indie production with B-list actors. I have much respect for new/up and coming filmmakers, and I rate them fair based on what they have to work with. You may see a B low budget film that you may not like get an 8/10, and a big A-film Hollywood blockbuster get a 6/10, only because the A film had everything it needed to be great, and the B film worked with very little (experience, budget, etc.) yet was impressive - all factors considered.

Thus it will be very rare any movie will get a 1 (unless it's riddled with fake reviews from cast, crew and friends) or a 10 (unless it is perfection in every category above) from me, but instead will range between that scale - also taking into account the filmmakers experience, budget, etc. As a rule, anything I rate either a 7 or 8, I liked enough that I will watch it again and still highly recommend. The lower numbers will be more of a critique for the filmmaker in areas they need to improve, as well as details for the potential audience to evaluate if that film is still worth seeing (e.g. loud constant annoying score - maybe you don't mind that) and will satisfy their expectations.

Additionally, those who give a film a 1/10 annoy me. Every film should have some good qualities, and it's a "scale" between 1-10, not 1 "or" 10. I've seen some reviewers give a 1 because the film isn't out yet so they think it's a fake review; Films do have early screenings at film festivals, early releases at various countries or distributors, and "award consideration" pre-releases to certain viewers and critics.

But what burns me the most, is when filmmakers spam and shill their IMDb account with ridiculous comments and clearly fake 9 & 10/10's. IMDb is a transparent opinion-based forum that relies on honest reviews from its members. Spamming a movie with many fake high reviews only tells me that the filmmakers don't even have faith in their own production, and thus have to lie to their potential audience into watching their movie. That's just pathetic, and an embarrassment to the industry and the real filmmakers out there trying their best and being honest.

The best way to see if a review is fake, click on the username; if one or a few reviews (usually the same date/s), a new account, or an account with many IMDb film criteria entries (plot, photos, summaries, film specs, etc.), that's usually a filmmaker or crew upvoting their own film - although I have myself entered/contributed missing relevant details/plot summaries etc. that I found elsewhere (Wiki, RT, etc) and I'm not a filmmaker. So, do every IMDb member a favor and report that fake review, and if that film has many 10/10, down-vote them all (and report) and up-vote the real honest reviews. It may not stop the filmmaker and his crew from posting more fake reviews, but at least all the up and down votes from members like you may help them from not wasting their time to see a flagrantly upvoted film.

Also if you see many shill fake high reviews, chances are your honest low review will get reported and deleted by all the new fake accounts. Simply keep reposting and reporting/downvoting the phony reviews. And do what I and most of the users who notice their honest review got deleted... repost and lower your rating to a 1/10. If you see lots of those along with many high reviews, it's just the honest members being angry and lowering their score in hopes of offsetting the falsely high ratings that IMDb overlooked as spam.

And if you're that filmmaker, cast/crew creating the fake upvotes, you are doing more harm than good for your own film; Members will give you the 1 for every 10/10 you post, when they may have given you a 6 or 7, as I would and have.

Finally, none of my reviews will ever by biased or paid for. Every rating and review will be based on my personal opinion using factors that professional critics use (and in considering everything I've said above) - instead of a film summary, and my exact rating and review can also be found on Rotten Tomatoes, and many other entertainment review outlets.
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.

Badges2

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Watchlist12

The Engineer
7.5
The Engineer
The Chronicles of Riddick
6.6
The Chronicles of Riddick
The Shawshank Redemption
9.3
The Shawshank Redemption
Mad Max: Fury Road
8.1
Mad Max: Fury Road
The Martian
8.0
The Martian
Alien: Covenant
6.4
Alien: Covenant
Prometheus
7.0
Prometheus
Snowpiercer
7.1
Snowpiercer
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
7.6
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
John Wick
7.5
John Wick
Interstellar
8.7
Interstellar
Shot Caller
7.3
Shot Caller

Reviews36

Mister-GTA's rating
Sharp Corner

Sharp Corner

5.9
5
  • Aug 6, 2025
  • Paint drying is more exciting.

    This was waaayyyy too long. It would've been better as a short film, not the 110 min runtime that felt like four hours. It just dragged on and on with the same exact premise and predictable outcomes. When you're a salesman but was born a first responder. Ya, we get it.

    And as a fan of Ben Foster, not sure why all the critics are praising his performance (or the film for that matter)... it was flaccid and any actor - even inexperienced, could've pulled off his character and stale demeanor.

    It's a generous 5/10, mostly all going to the smoking hot Cobie Smulders for her excellent and convincing performance.
    Sovereign

    Sovereign

    6.5
    5
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • Ignore the bogus high reviews

    The directing, screenplay and editing is what failed the outstanding cast performances. I get that the director and writer is a newb, but basic filmmaking 101 - what they teach in fifth grade drama class could've really made this movie shine. Instead, there's random nonsensical dialogue and scene cuts that'll make you rewind numerous times thinking you missed something, when it's just bad filmmaking, Example: the conversation trying to book a motel made no sense - he signed something and had cash, so what was the problem that the motel clerk ignored him and walked away? There's lots of simple fixable issues like this that are annoying, and even worse, no effort to edit in post. The bogus high reviews have more clarity and cohesion than the movie that was a huge missed opportunity in the right filmmakers hands. It's a generous 5/10 all going to the cast and their great performances.
    Ballerina

    Ballerina

    7.0
    6
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • Ana de Armas needs to stop doing action movies

    Seriously, Ana de Armas needs to stop doing action movies. Nothing against the actress, but in action films, she is the farthest from being believable in any action sequences, especially when she looks like a spoiled pretty teenager that should be cast only in rom-coms.

    Some actors just have that "action hero it-factor" - de Armas doesn't.

    So Ballerina just ends up feeling mildly exhilarating, albeit well-produced, choreographed and visually stylish, but tedious, dull and uninspired.

    I mean seriously, as if a 100 pound soaking wet teen-looking gal can take out an entire town.

    It's almost embarrassing and an insult to the entire Wick franchise.

    It's a generous 6/10 from me, all going to Mr. Wick and the flame-throwers.
    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.