helfriedberger
Joined Nov 2024
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges7
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings28
helfriedberger's rating
Reviews1
helfriedberger's rating
What this TV-series pretends to be, namely an objective review of the Catrine da Costa case, is not fulfilled at all by the creators Dan Josefsson and Johannes Hallbom. Instead, we receive a very biased submission that excludes all persons, events and facts that do not match the authors' product. Just another personal opinion. I do not claim that it is easy to try to clarify what is actually facts in this case and what is not. A 40-year old tragedy where, in this min-series, the victim itself ended up in the background. Like so many times before. With regard to the accused and partly acquitted Teet Härm, it is possible to find out this person's actions during the first years of the 1980s, and thereby distinguish the slander from facts.