Kaykiwis
Joined Oct 2019
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges4
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
Kaykiwis's rating
Another biased and slanted documentary about the OJ Simpson case filled with lies and misrepresentations. Court TV's OJ25 docuseries remains the only one that tells the truth about the OJ Simpson trial, not the overrated OJ: Made in America or The People v. OJ Simpson.
It's funny how the rumor about OJ not taking his arthritis medicine so the gloves wouldn't fit was debunked during the trial but still gets repeated as a fact.
Kim Goldman denied Trayvon Martin's murder was racially motivated (so did Fred) and defended George Zimmerman's acquittal. Her father Fred also went after Sydney and Justin Simpson for money several years ago.
I'll leave this review with a 2016 Vulture interview from juror Sheila Woods:
I guess maybe black people cheering was less about O. J. and more about the politics of the LAPD at the time, police brutality. A lot of their catharsis was bigger than O. J. I can understand that. But at the end of the day, two people were murdered.
I think most people thought we based our decision on race. Race never came up in the topic of our deliberation, or even how the LAPD treated black people.
Like, regarding Fuhrman, none of his comments really ...
The thing with Fuhrman was once his credibility was shot, you really could discount anything he said. He was definitely a liar - he lied on the stand - and when he came back to the court, he took the fifth on everything. Why would you trust anything he said? He was the detective that found all this evidence: the blood on the Bronco, on the back fence, on the glove ... all of that created reasonable doubt.
Was there a moment in particular during the trial that really swayed your decision towards reasonable doubt?
Yeah, when they started talking about the blood evidence. There was, like, a milliliter of blood they couldn't account for. And they found blood on the back fence of Nicole's condo, and that particular blood also had the additive in there. That additive is only found in a test tube of blood, so why would the blood sample on that back fence contain that additive unless somebody took the blood from the test tube and placed it there?
Do you think O. J. was framed?
I don't know if he was necessarily framed. I think O. J. may know something about what happened, but I just don't think he did it. I think it was more than one person, just because of the way she was killed. I don't know how he could have just left that bloody scene - because it was bloody - and got back into his Bronco and not have it filled with blood. And then go back home and go in the front door, up the stairs to his bedroom ... That carpet was snow white in his house. He should have blood all over him or bruises because Ron Goldman was definitely fighting for his life. He had defensive cuts on his shoes and on his hands.
O. J. Only had that little cut on his finger. If Goldman was kicking to death, you would think that the killer would have gotten some bruises on his body. They showed us photos of O. J. with just his underwear just two days after, and he had no bruises or anything on his body.
It's funny how the rumor about OJ not taking his arthritis medicine so the gloves wouldn't fit was debunked during the trial but still gets repeated as a fact.
Kim Goldman denied Trayvon Martin's murder was racially motivated (so did Fred) and defended George Zimmerman's acquittal. Her father Fred also went after Sydney and Justin Simpson for money several years ago.
I'll leave this review with a 2016 Vulture interview from juror Sheila Woods:
I guess maybe black people cheering was less about O. J. and more about the politics of the LAPD at the time, police brutality. A lot of their catharsis was bigger than O. J. I can understand that. But at the end of the day, two people were murdered.
I think most people thought we based our decision on race. Race never came up in the topic of our deliberation, or even how the LAPD treated black people.
Like, regarding Fuhrman, none of his comments really ...
The thing with Fuhrman was once his credibility was shot, you really could discount anything he said. He was definitely a liar - he lied on the stand - and when he came back to the court, he took the fifth on everything. Why would you trust anything he said? He was the detective that found all this evidence: the blood on the Bronco, on the back fence, on the glove ... all of that created reasonable doubt.
Was there a moment in particular during the trial that really swayed your decision towards reasonable doubt?
Yeah, when they started talking about the blood evidence. There was, like, a milliliter of blood they couldn't account for. And they found blood on the back fence of Nicole's condo, and that particular blood also had the additive in there. That additive is only found in a test tube of blood, so why would the blood sample on that back fence contain that additive unless somebody took the blood from the test tube and placed it there?
Do you think O. J. was framed?
I don't know if he was necessarily framed. I think O. J. may know something about what happened, but I just don't think he did it. I think it was more than one person, just because of the way she was killed. I don't know how he could have just left that bloody scene - because it was bloody - and got back into his Bronco and not have it filled with blood. And then go back home and go in the front door, up the stairs to his bedroom ... That carpet was snow white in his house. He should have blood all over him or bruises because Ron Goldman was definitely fighting for his life. He had defensive cuts on his shoes and on his hands.
O. J. Only had that little cut on his finger. If Goldman was kicking to death, you would think that the killer would have gotten some bruises on his body. They showed us photos of O. J. with just his underwear just two days after, and he had no bruises or anything on his body.
There was just 1/8th of one drop of blood found in the Bronco. It was proven at the trial how the blood on the socks and the blood on the back gate were planted, and both also had EDTA in them. Everyone who interacted with OJ at the airport and on the flight to Chicago including those who shook hands with him, observed his hands, and got autographs from him testified to seeing no cuts or bandages on his hands. A broken glass and towel with blood on it were found in his hotel room in Chicago. Douglas Deedrick said under oath that there was no hair consistent with Nicole's found in the Bronco when he was questioned by F. Lee Bailey. There was no blood found in OJ's plumbing, washing machine, or drain traps. The stains supposedly found in his shower were so small that Dennis Fung was never able to confirm it was human blood. If someone left that crime scene they would've been covered in blood. Ron Goldman fought ferociously for his life and had defensive wounds on his hands and shoes indicating he landed blows on his killer, yet OJ had no bruises on his body. Watch Court TV's OJ25 docuseries instead of this biased, one sided documentary.
