Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings213
chukoloco's rating
Reviews9
chukoloco's rating
Here's my review for Our Drawings.
This movie may be one hour long, but it has multiple negative qualities, such as that the pacing of the film can either go at a breakneck speed and all of a sudden get slow and boring, and the story/world-building is also confusing and incoherent at the same time. Also it doesn't take the time to introduce some of the other characters, and rather introduces the same character we already met (Paige) multiple times. I'm curious, who's the name of the furry blue guy with bunny ears or the floating rock guy with sunglasses?
It does have potential, but the execution made it hard to tell what's going on even less than 10 minutes into the movie, and things mostly just happen or even repeat (like Paige's backstory), and some of the characters can be annoying and sometimes obnoxious.
The afterimage effect for the animation also made it harder to watch (especially scenes where characters or the camera move fast). But the animation/visuals itself isn't the worst and can sometimes be passable, but it's not amazing.
The editing is also all over the place too (for example, a scene will fade out even in the middle of a conversation, and it happens often.)
However there are some positives, the parts that I found the most positive and somewhat funny include the Wizard and Beatboxing Puppy characters.
I don't really think this movie's great, and there are definitely multiple flaws that needs to be fixed with the pacing, characters, animation (the afterimage effect), editing, and story/world-building for it to be good, and it's better to watch something else. I'll give it a 2-3/10 for the effort (and Beatboxing Puppy)
This movie may be one hour long, but it has multiple negative qualities, such as that the pacing of the film can either go at a breakneck speed and all of a sudden get slow and boring, and the story/world-building is also confusing and incoherent at the same time. Also it doesn't take the time to introduce some of the other characters, and rather introduces the same character we already met (Paige) multiple times. I'm curious, who's the name of the furry blue guy with bunny ears or the floating rock guy with sunglasses?
It does have potential, but the execution made it hard to tell what's going on even less than 10 minutes into the movie, and things mostly just happen or even repeat (like Paige's backstory), and some of the characters can be annoying and sometimes obnoxious.
The afterimage effect for the animation also made it harder to watch (especially scenes where characters or the camera move fast). But the animation/visuals itself isn't the worst and can sometimes be passable, but it's not amazing.
The editing is also all over the place too (for example, a scene will fade out even in the middle of a conversation, and it happens often.)
However there are some positives, the parts that I found the most positive and somewhat funny include the Wizard and Beatboxing Puppy characters.
I don't really think this movie's great, and there are definitely multiple flaws that needs to be fixed with the pacing, characters, animation (the afterimage effect), editing, and story/world-building for it to be good, and it's better to watch something else. I'll give it a 2-3/10 for the effort (and Beatboxing Puppy)
Ratatoing, which we all know is obviously some MockBuster to ride off the coattails of a more original and superior movie, which is Disney and Pixar's Ratatouille.
I don't understand the concept of MockBusters, as all it does is make the MockBuster movie be a laughing stock and make the studio close down and be defunct after a few years. As it struck to multiple studios who did stuff like that such as Video Brinquedo, Dingo Pictures, and more.
Plus MockBusters like Ratatoing, they are poorly made pieces of garbage which somehow gets money, probably from those easily tricked or those who find really bad movies amusing.
The animation's quality perishes like cheese, to the point where the mouths of the mice jerk like crazy when they talk, and a cat that runs on twos.
The characters barely have thought processing (or a sense of intelligence).
And the story lags so hard that most scenes drag out for long periods of time even when they aren't supposed to be like that for a movie like this which is apparently less than a whole hour.
I just hope that there would be no more MockBusters being made in the future, as nobody should have to suffer through these non-entity "films" which copy better movies for attention and of course, money.
I don't understand the concept of MockBusters, as all it does is make the MockBuster movie be a laughing stock and make the studio close down and be defunct after a few years. As it struck to multiple studios who did stuff like that such as Video Brinquedo, Dingo Pictures, and more.
Plus MockBusters like Ratatoing, they are poorly made pieces of garbage which somehow gets money, probably from those easily tricked or those who find really bad movies amusing.
The animation's quality perishes like cheese, to the point where the mouths of the mice jerk like crazy when they talk, and a cat that runs on twos.
The characters barely have thought processing (or a sense of intelligence).
And the story lags so hard that most scenes drag out for long periods of time even when they aren't supposed to be like that for a movie like this which is apparently less than a whole hour.
I just hope that there would be no more MockBusters being made in the future, as nobody should have to suffer through these non-entity "films" which copy better movies for attention and of course, money.
Groundhog Dave 2 is not just a abysmal movie, it feels like it doesn't even count as one.
It clearly gives you signs that it isn't going to be any good in the beginning, which the title appears for the movie, and it has a typo in it saying "Grounghog Dave 2".
There is pretty much no effort or care that was put into the movie. The groundhog character looks so dead eyed and ugly to look at.
And the characters pretty much just stand there and monotonously talk for long periods of time with nothing going on, possibly to make it qualified as a feature film.
There is also no action or something to keep someone entertained, even though they probably wouldn't with the long talking and standing.
WOWNow Entertainment really needs to step up and make better movies, as they shouldn't be allowed to make and distribute so many trashy movies that are made in less than a month. So their reputation as a competent movie studio would increase, but I doubt it would happen with their recent movies.
I am only happy that I didn't pay money to see it, but rather watch a smidge of the movie for free on the Peacock streaming service, I didn't feel like watching all of it as most of the movie is mind numbing and dumb.
It clearly gives you signs that it isn't going to be any good in the beginning, which the title appears for the movie, and it has a typo in it saying "Grounghog Dave 2".
There is pretty much no effort or care that was put into the movie. The groundhog character looks so dead eyed and ugly to look at.
And the characters pretty much just stand there and monotonously talk for long periods of time with nothing going on, possibly to make it qualified as a feature film.
There is also no action or something to keep someone entertained, even though they probably wouldn't with the long talking and standing.
WOWNow Entertainment really needs to step up and make better movies, as they shouldn't be allowed to make and distribute so many trashy movies that are made in less than a month. So their reputation as a competent movie studio would increase, but I doubt it would happen with their recent movies.
I am only happy that I didn't pay money to see it, but rather watch a smidge of the movie for free on the Peacock streaming service, I didn't feel like watching all of it as most of the movie is mind numbing and dumb.