Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app

mossgrymk

Joined Sep 2020
Thanks for reading my stuff!

Favorite genres: noirs, westerns, war films, family dramas, black comedies, chick flics, workplace dramas, social satire

Least Favorite genres: silent films, musicals, sci fi, horror (Lewton excepted), inspirational stuff

Included is my directorial aesthetic:

Great director...a person who over a long period has a strong visual sense, good pacing, and a deep understanding of human behavior. (i.e. Sofia Coppola)

Good director...Has two of the three or has all three but has not had a long enough career (i.e. Claudia Weill)

Ok director...Has one of the three or has none of them but is consistently entertaining (i.e. Nancy Myers)

Bad director...Has one or none of the three and is usually a bore (i.e. Dorothy Arzner )
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.

Badges2

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Reviews1.6K

mossgrymk's rating
Lifeguard

Lifeguard

6.6
8
  • Aug 8, 2025
  • lifeguard

    I fondly recall this forgotten 70s look at So Cal beach culture. Scenarist Ron Koslow and director Daniel Petrie tackle the question a lot of us face in our early to mid 30s, namely, What am I gonna do with the rest of my damn life? And they do it with a notable lack of pretension and/or speechifying that is most refreshing, especially when you contrast it with heavy handed treatments of the same theme emanating from the Stirling Silliphant/Steve Shagan types who were popular back then. Also aiding this film immensely is a fine performance in the lead/title role from Sam Elliot who with his combination of eternal bemusement and wry humor could be Jeff Labowski's slightly less bright younger sib. And Kathleen Quinlan, an actor I've always liked who, for whatever reason, never quite made it, is also good as a neurotic beach chick. Give it a B plus.
    Mansfield Park

    Mansfield Park

    7.0
    7
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • mansfield park

    I see where the film makers have considerably sexed and jazzed up Austen's most somber novel. It is undoubtedly more entertaining and a whole lot less stodgy but as an admirer of the 1814 work I confess to a feeling of dismay (an emotion often felt by Austen women) that things that in the novel were left beneath the surface, such as the heroine Fanny Price's feelings about slavery and the sexual ambiguity of Mary Crawford are, in Patricia Rozema's film, shoved rather rudely in the viewer's face. I also did not like altering characters to fit turn of the 21st century Me Too tropes such as making Sir Thomas a leering, incestuous old man rather than the interestingly ambivalent person he is in the book with half of him in sympathy with Fanny for her travails and the other half in opposition to her desire not to marry the sleazy Henry Crawford because of Sir Thomas' conventional, paternalistic views on submissive womanhood.

    So, have a good time watching but after you're done might I suggest picking up the original work and doing a little cost/benefit analysis? B minus.
    Household Saints

    Household Saints

    6.9
    5
  • Apr 3, 2025
  • household saints

    It's sweet as all get out with great affection for its characters and for those reasons I REALLY wanted to like it but I just could not shake off the cloak of boredom that enveloped me from the film's first scene. The characters, while occasionally touching and even at times charming, are just not very interesting and director/co writer Nancy Savoca doesn't give them much to do beyond being generically Italian. There is also in the dialogue and cinematography an annoying ersatz Fellini by way of "Marty" vibe that makes you wish you were watching the real thing rather than this second hand stuff. After about an hour I pulled the plug. Solid C.
    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.