andiarrhonds
Joined Nov 2020
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings25
andiarrhonds's rating
Reviews12
andiarrhonds's rating
Just kidding, of course.
I am also the only single person remaining who remembers this film.
Why do I remember it, you may ask?
Because back in the 90s you had to connect to the internet with a dial-up modem, and this prevented the entire phone line inside your home from being used. This was also before people had cell phones, so the phone in your home was especially important.
So to make a long story short. I was cyber chatting with a bunch of hot ladies. And nobody was able to call my home. This has absolutely nothing to do with the film though.
Maybe I just really like chatting on the internet.
I am also the only single person remaining who remembers this film.
Why do I remember it, you may ask?
Because back in the 90s you had to connect to the internet with a dial-up modem, and this prevented the entire phone line inside your home from being used. This was also before people had cell phones, so the phone in your home was especially important.
So to make a long story short. I was cyber chatting with a bunch of hot ladies. And nobody was able to call my home. This has absolutely nothing to do with the film though.
Maybe I just really like chatting on the internet.
Despite this movie featuring Dick Powell, I still managed to enjoy it. Dont get me wrong, Powell is a pretty decent actor, but his character is always rather two dimensional and predictable to me. I suppose this would be a personal opinion of mine. But anyway, the rest of the cast seem to pick up the slack. Jane Greer is especially pleasant, an underrated female actress. Highly attractive but also likeable. I suppose nobody considers what type of audience which Greer would captivate.
Both her and this movie are entirely underrated.
Both her and this movie are entirely underrated.
Movie was worth it for Terence Hill and Eli Wallach alone.
Not sure why anyone would rate this so low. Yes, its obviously not a big budget film, but the actors and the setting are some of the best. People like this just dont exist anymore. Its such a unique style of film from a period of time never coming back. Young Terence Hill is perhaps one of the most stone cold hombres I've ever seen. Its such a perfect casting. And Wallach... Wallach is always pleasant to behold. The film is not bad at all despite the use of dubbed voices. True, the acting is perhaps not the most vibrant, but I dont look at this as a shortcoming at all. I think it only adds the overall character of the film.
I'm so disappointed in the current user rating being under 7.0. I just cant understand why this would be. Doesn't feel right.
My personal and realistic rating as a fan of westerns from the early 1930s, and all the way up into 1979, would be a score of 8.5.
However I'm giving it a full 10 score here in hopes it might someday elevate this current and low user rating. It deserves it.
Not sure why anyone would rate this so low. Yes, its obviously not a big budget film, but the actors and the setting are some of the best. People like this just dont exist anymore. Its such a unique style of film from a period of time never coming back. Young Terence Hill is perhaps one of the most stone cold hombres I've ever seen. Its such a perfect casting. And Wallach... Wallach is always pleasant to behold. The film is not bad at all despite the use of dubbed voices. True, the acting is perhaps not the most vibrant, but I dont look at this as a shortcoming at all. I think it only adds the overall character of the film.
I'm so disappointed in the current user rating being under 7.0. I just cant understand why this would be. Doesn't feel right.
My personal and realistic rating as a fan of westerns from the early 1930s, and all the way up into 1979, would be a score of 8.5.
However I'm giving it a full 10 score here in hopes it might someday elevate this current and low user rating. It deserves it.