pleasework-59014
Joined Jan 2021
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews2
pleasework-59014's rating
First read the quote of another user and mine is after speech marks. According to hari-3128720
"Kinda sad how they defend hassan sabbah and act like he was a good person in real life 😂 don't believe everything you read on wiki lmao"
So this hari says you shouldn't believe anything on wiki who can say with gaurantee that what the show is portraying is accurate, you can't can you, were you there in that time? No, that is why for accuracy you need to take history from both sides which was done in ertugrul ghazi. Thry actually considered the view of the chrisitians and even showed how some of them were brave and even they used journals from the christian Papaizam for accuracy but Uyanis; complete opposite, they only wrote about goodness of celjuks and showed not a single person form Hassan Sabah's side as capable of any goodness which is completely inaccurate. The simple fact that one side is shown pure evil is a lie, a fsntasy it can not be a historically just depiction. Hopefully, some if not all of you would agree.
So this hari says you shouldn't believe anything on wiki who can say with gaurantee that what the show is portraying is accurate, you can't can you, were you there in that time? No, that is why for accuracy you need to take history from both sides which was done in ertugrul ghazi. Thry actually considered the view of the chrisitians and even showed how some of them were brave and even they used journals from the christian Papaizam for accuracy but Uyanis; complete opposite, they only wrote about goodness of celjuks and showed not a single person form Hassan Sabah's side as capable of any goodness which is completely inaccurate. The simple fact that one side is shown pure evil is a lie, a fsntasy it can not be a historically just depiction. Hopefully, some if not all of you would agree.
