provita-11142
Joined Feb 2021
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews43
provita-11142's rating
I was looking forward to this movie but was so disappointed because nothing went well. The stories were force and superficial at best. The four main characters had little chemistry with each other especially between Noah and Ricky. Everything felt so last minute and thrown in and I have a bad feeling that Patrick did a Tyler Perry and shot everything in four days. Yeah, a D-
I was looking forward to this movie but was so disappointed because nothing went well. The stories were force and superficial at best. The four main characters had little chemistry with each other especially between Noah and Ricky. Everything felt so last minute and thrown in and I have a bad feeling that Patrick did a Tyler Perry and shot everything in four days. Yeah, a D-
I was looking forward to this movie but was so disappointed because nothing went well. The stories were force and superficial at best. The four main characters had little chemistry with each other especially between Noah and Ricky. Everything felt so last minute and thrown in and I have a bad feeling that Patrick did a Tyler Perry and shot everything in four days. Yeah, a D-
The movie was stunning without a question of doubt but sweet Marian, Joseph, Jesus the singing!
I will be honest, I hate musicals, always have and always will. The problem I have with musicals is can we get to the point, please? It drags on and on.
Another issue I have is there's very little magic. Despite the appearance, there's not a lot of magic. This movie reminds me of Pleasantville meets Carrie but with the added spice of oppression against Earth animals.
Do I consider the movie as a predecessor? No. It's its own film that has no connection to the Wizard of OZ because none of it lines up or makes sense. I don't know where the Earth animals came from, I mean I know there are lions, tigers, and bears but there are other creatures too like gnomes, fairies, munchkins aka dwarfs, etc. Etc. There's a huge deficiency of different beings (I know, I know the budget).
In all honesty I prefer Once Upon A Time Wicked Witch over this.
I will be honest, I hate musicals, always have and always will. The problem I have with musicals is can we get to the point, please? It drags on and on.
Another issue I have is there's very little magic. Despite the appearance, there's not a lot of magic. This movie reminds me of Pleasantville meets Carrie but with the added spice of oppression against Earth animals.
Do I consider the movie as a predecessor? No. It's its own film that has no connection to the Wizard of OZ because none of it lines up or makes sense. I don't know where the Earth animals came from, I mean I know there are lions, tigers, and bears but there are other creatures too like gnomes, fairies, munchkins aka dwarfs, etc. Etc. There's a huge deficiency of different beings (I know, I know the budget).
In all honesty I prefer Once Upon A Time Wicked Witch over this.
This Leopard is definitely the opposite from both the film and book.
It is true that series take a deeper dive into the political world, but Don Fabrizio in the book and film doesn't really get involves because he accepts that he's an old man whose world is dying therefore accept the changes but worries for the future of his children.
Unlike the film/book, Don Fabrizio doesn't like his nephew at all.
Concetta is more emotional than the wallflower Concetta.
The Father or priest is timid compared to the more cynical Father who seen both sides of Don Fabrizio.
Despite the name, I don't consider this mini series to be the actual The Leopard because Lampedusa and Visconti who were actual Italian noblemen who knows the world through and through while this was produced by a middle-class Brit.
Let me tell you no one would ever speak back to Don Fabrizio since he is the head of the family, the aristocracy is very patriarchal and religious. Second, where are all the bonnets? Ladies, especially noblewomen, would never have their hair loose like that nor uncovered. Third, despite Concetta being a woman, she have to have an escort regardless because women in those times were considered children who need a permanent guardian, so there's no way Concetta will be walking around like that and doing what she wants without her father's permission.
Unlike the book/film, Tancredi and Angelica meet by "chance" or should I say cunning scheme by her father.
Don't get me wrong, I know Richard Warlow is trying to add some personalities because truth be told, Italian nobles have so little of it.
However I am just a little annoyed with the reviews who are trying to bash the original film to uplift this one which is quite sad.
It is true that series take a deeper dive into the political world, but Don Fabrizio in the book and film doesn't really get involves because he accepts that he's an old man whose world is dying therefore accept the changes but worries for the future of his children.
Unlike the film/book, Don Fabrizio doesn't like his nephew at all.
Concetta is more emotional than the wallflower Concetta.
The Father or priest is timid compared to the more cynical Father who seen both sides of Don Fabrizio.
Despite the name, I don't consider this mini series to be the actual The Leopard because Lampedusa and Visconti who were actual Italian noblemen who knows the world through and through while this was produced by a middle-class Brit.
Let me tell you no one would ever speak back to Don Fabrizio since he is the head of the family, the aristocracy is very patriarchal and religious. Second, where are all the bonnets? Ladies, especially noblewomen, would never have their hair loose like that nor uncovered. Third, despite Concetta being a woman, she have to have an escort regardless because women in those times were considered children who need a permanent guardian, so there's no way Concetta will be walking around like that and doing what she wants without her father's permission.
Unlike the book/film, Tancredi and Angelica meet by "chance" or should I say cunning scheme by her father.
Don't get me wrong, I know Richard Warlow is trying to add some personalities because truth be told, Italian nobles have so little of it.
However I am just a little annoyed with the reviews who are trying to bash the original film to uplift this one which is quite sad.