lizzyispink
Joined Apr 2021
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews11
lizzyispink's rating
Not a single actor delivered dialogue naturally. Every character spoke in an oddly stiff and wooden manner. They all sounded like non-Americans, often non English speakers, trying (without any real desire) to sound American. It was like a bad SNL skit poking fun at the rigid, stodgy formality of the Victorian era. Utterly unwatchable. Not sure if it was the actors, the direction or the dialog, probably a combination of all. It was as if there was absolutely no direction and the first take was used- no editing or reshoots art all. Two stars for the attention to detail in the costumes, sets and hair/makeup.
There should be a warning alerting viewers this is a Steven Moffat affair at the top of the screen along with the rating. Anyone familiar with his contribution to the downfall of Doctor Who would know to avoid this dreck.
Tucci, who is usually brilliant, is unable to shine due to the dire plot and dialogue. Tenant (who is usually brilliant as well), in the role of Harry the vicar, looks like he just popped into the studio to do his scenes, after being holed up at home for several months unable/unwilling to shave or see a barber. Harry continually makes unbelievable, extremely foolish, rash and pretty insane decisions. It's preposterous and would be laughable if this wasn't meant to be serious. In every scene Harry acts ludicrously and irrationally and the viewer will get a headache from all the eye rolling.
How is the freelance journalist able to travel to the US-who is funding her trip and why? To find a missing acquaintance when there is no police investigation? How did she find out about Grieff and his very implausible help in people's personal lives? Why would he agree to speak with a journalist who is upset over being ghosted? And what's up with the Sherlock/Watson death row duo? Why are they allowed to do visitations together? The plot holes bring up endless questions.
There are millions of ways to better spend four hours. Do something, anything, else.
Tucci, who is usually brilliant, is unable to shine due to the dire plot and dialogue. Tenant (who is usually brilliant as well), in the role of Harry the vicar, looks like he just popped into the studio to do his scenes, after being holed up at home for several months unable/unwilling to shave or see a barber. Harry continually makes unbelievable, extremely foolish, rash and pretty insane decisions. It's preposterous and would be laughable if this wasn't meant to be serious. In every scene Harry acts ludicrously and irrationally and the viewer will get a headache from all the eye rolling.
How is the freelance journalist able to travel to the US-who is funding her trip and why? To find a missing acquaintance when there is no police investigation? How did she find out about Grieff and his very implausible help in people's personal lives? Why would he agree to speak with a journalist who is upset over being ghosted? And what's up with the Sherlock/Watson death row duo? Why are they allowed to do visitations together? The plot holes bring up endless questions.
There are millions of ways to better spend four hours. Do something, anything, else.