martinrandall-36706
Joined Jul 2021
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings59
martinrandall-36706's rating
Reviews42
martinrandall-36706's rating
This is nothing more than a sad attempt at emptying the pockets of Beetlejuice fans. This updated sequel suffers from gross inconsistencies in story and creativity. Why are weird add-on characters (Delores, Wolf) given so much screen and story time? You have one of the funniest and best written films ever made in the original Beetlejuice from 1988 and there is no need to re-engineer it. I literally turned it off during the wedding scene, only to go back and re-watch the entire film the next day. The wedding represents this film in a nutshell: pointless, tone deaf, overly long and stupid. Of the original cast that showed up, I did enjoy Keaton and O'Hara and found them as funny as ever although Winona Ryder was off her game.
Call it what you will, a reboot, a re-imagining, or a sequel, I call it a plain old-fashioned bad idea from the start. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice has no soul and it's not funny.
Call it what you will, a reboot, a re-imagining, or a sequel, I call it a plain old-fashioned bad idea from the start. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice has no soul and it's not funny.
