Scuffers
Joined Oct 2021
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
Scuffers's rating
The real story of Lamborghini is the stuff of legends, and sadly, this film is NONE of that.
Terrible script, poor acting, tradjically bad set-pieces, laughable 'racing' and almost zero adherance to history.
I get that to make the film work, some stuff has to be massaged for the story, but this is just laughbly poor, I can only imagine the script writter was an intern given only a week to come up with somthing?
Compare this with Ford vs. Ferrari where they had the story not only close to acurate, but the charicters cast well, their intations realistic, the film-sets looked the part, the cars were the part, etc etc. - and that film grossed $225m
Lamborghini should sue for deformation.
Terrible script, poor acting, tradjically bad set-pieces, laughable 'racing' and almost zero adherance to history.
I get that to make the film work, some stuff has to be massaged for the story, but this is just laughbly poor, I can only imagine the script writter was an intern given only a week to come up with somthing?
Compare this with Ford vs. Ferrari where they had the story not only close to acurate, but the charicters cast well, their intations realistic, the film-sets looked the part, the cars were the part, etc etc. - and that film grossed $225m
Lamborghini should sue for deformation.
Not going to tell you this is a femail version of John Wick, but it's entertaining.
The weak point for me is they needed more time to fleash out the back story and the dialougue was hard to hear over the ambient sounds.
The way its ended is obvoiulsy crying out for a follow-on.
The weak point for me is they needed more time to fleash out the back story and the dialougue was hard to hear over the ambient sounds.
The way its ended is obvoiulsy crying out for a follow-on.
OK, the good points:
1) great camera work 2) good music 3) some great actors
the bad points:
A) shockingly poor story B) totally unbelievable characters C) WAY too slow D) simply nothing to get invested in.
How on earth did something this bad every raise the budget to get made?
1) great camera work 2) good music 3) some great actors
the bad points:
A) shockingly poor story B) totally unbelievable characters C) WAY too slow D) simply nothing to get invested in.
How on earth did something this bad every raise the budget to get made?