davidlohr

Don't bother. She complains about the media attention the case brought and the fact that some people made a profit from telling the story. But it all reeks of jealousy considering she wrote a book about it herself and is now in a Netflix series about it. This had nothing to do with privacy and was, in my opinion, all about getting herself some attention.

I wonder how much advertising executives paid for all the positive reviews for this flick? Some are so blatantly fake it's laughable. This is one of the most boring "horror" films I've seen in years. It wasn't scary and it didn't have me on the edge of my seat. I gave it 3 stars because, despite it being such a terrible flick, the actors did a good job with what they had.

I watched this until the first laugh track and turned it off. It's nearly 2025. There is no need to treat your audience like sheep. If you're material isn't funny enough on its own than the issue is with the writer and not the audience. Anyone in production who feels a laugh track is necessary is about 20+ years past the date that they should've retired. What's equally annoying is IMBD now requiring us to write a book before we can submit our review. I have 139 characters left... 118 characters left... 97 characters left... 77 characters left... 57 characters left... 37 characters left. 17 characters left. Done. Phew...