MrDeWinter

Loren's son again on the search for prestigious parts for his mother to 'shine' no matter how inappropriate. This isn't right for her. She is far too old for this part. Watch Ingrid Bergman's performance from 1967 and you will see the difference.

Loren's son again on the search for prestigious parts for his mother to 'shine' no matter how inappropriate. This isn't right for her. She is far too old for this part. Watch Ingrid Bergman's performance from 1967 and you will see the difference.

Loren's son again on the search for prestigious parts for his mother to 'shine' no matter how inappropriate. This isn't right for her. She is far too old for this part. Watch Ingrid Bergman's performance from 1967 and you will see the difference.

Jim Parsons blank face makes it very difficult to engage in his character. He is not a character actor. The love scenes are unconvincing. They say opposites attract but here you cant help but wonder what do they see in each other. Especially someone as gorgeous as Ben Aldridge, we dont get to understand what he sees in Jim Parson. Jim Parsons is strangly lit and covered in make up in order to hide the 12 year gap between him and Ben Aldridge. Also the relationship with his parents was never explained. One moment they appear to be conservative and the next moment we hear from his dad they are super liberal. Overall better than expected but could have been a much better movie with a better character development and without Jim Parsons.

Who's-done-it movies usually have big names, thats one of their appeal, next to an interesting story line. Unfurtunately most of the actors here are b-actors with no charisma. You don't really care about any of them. All of them are awful human beings, loud and toxic. The script is thin and the performances just mediocre. It becomes clear who the vilain is from the beginning, thats proof the story hasnt been executed correctly. Daniel should drop that annoying accent. Its not funny nor querky, he is no Peter Ustinov. Also, hinting that he is gay is not relevant nor necessary. A souless product.