Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews3
aikan-40957's rating
Helpful•311
Overall I found it to be of interest, what I cant figure out is why there ground detection team in episode 3 "Ben Hall" were using small coils on there metal detectors. They were detecting in a lupin field the farmer had cleared for them, yet they used small coils meaning the depth was minimal for detection. I fell the plowing of fields for possibly 100 years might have driven the artifacts deeper, using larger coils would have allowed deeper penetration taking that into account and making a better search.
Still very interesting show, each episode im learning new things I never knew about bushrangers I grew up knowing.
Still very interesting show, each episode im learning new things I never knew about bushrangers I grew up knowing.
Helpful•00
Honestly, you can take your critique on acting ability, how authentic the set looks, whether they were all drunk or on drugs and stuff it.
The only most important thing is whether it was entertaining. I'm not from that time, I'm not a professional critic (unlike some who seem to think they are) and don't put stock in 90% of what a critic says anyway.
I found this show to fill the most important criteria, "Was it entertaining" and for me yes it was very entertaining. I honestly couldn't give 2 farts for how they acted (looked OK to me) neither could I care less at how authentic the set looked (it was made in 2015 for gods sake), But did it fill the most important criteria, and for me that was a yes.
But then again I found gate of thrones, ash vs evil, the bastard executioner, castle, bones, scorpion, Vikings, Dr Who, elementary, the big bang theory, daredevil, dark matter, blue stone 42, defiance, from dusk till dawn, the bridge, black sails (to name a few) entertaining.
Don't care how bad the acting is (well up to a point), couldn't care less if the sets aren't 150% accurate to reality (it's only there to add background for the setting) and seriously couldn't give a hoot what other award winning programs they made before.
Rant over...
The only most important thing is whether it was entertaining. I'm not from that time, I'm not a professional critic (unlike some who seem to think they are) and don't put stock in 90% of what a critic says anyway.
I found this show to fill the most important criteria, "Was it entertaining" and for me yes it was very entertaining. I honestly couldn't give 2 farts for how they acted (looked OK to me) neither could I care less at how authentic the set looked (it was made in 2015 for gods sake), But did it fill the most important criteria, and for me that was a yes.
But then again I found gate of thrones, ash vs evil, the bastard executioner, castle, bones, scorpion, Vikings, Dr Who, elementary, the big bang theory, daredevil, dark matter, blue stone 42, defiance, from dusk till dawn, the bridge, black sails (to name a few) entertaining.
Don't care how bad the acting is (well up to a point), couldn't care less if the sets aren't 150% accurate to reality (it's only there to add background for the setting) and seriously couldn't give a hoot what other award winning programs they made before.
Rant over...
Helpful•45