cahimdb

The original plot is enough reason to see this movie. The central ethical issue has been done before but not like this. The acting is consistently good and the cinematography makes both urban and rural Japan a visual marvel.

"Rental Family" deals with truthfulness in relationships (an overworked subject) but puts it in a context that gives it a fresh perspective, without simplistic answers. While Frasier's character is critical of faked relationships, he's actively doing it in his own life, in a way that seems positive. Maybe some faking is kind.

Brendan Frasier's acting is excellent and the supporting cast is so consistently good, it's hard to name a standout. Akira Emoto is excellent as the old man who has a life of regrets. Takehiro Hira is great as the sympathetic "villain". Mari Yamamoto is just so dang charming. Shannon Gorman is strong and vulnerable as the daughter but never cloying.

If I had any criticism - the story was a little sleepy. It dragged about ¾ of the way through. More suspense or a few more plot elements would have helped. But it's not enough to spoil the movie. Rental Family is obviously made for both American and Japanese audiences and pacing is surely cultural.

Congratulations to Hikari and the whole team that made "Rental Family"

The plot is about a strong, smart, beautiful, competent, loving, hard-working woman failing. But, the commentary is that even the most capable woman can be set-up for failure by the impossible demands on women.

I think only a woman could make this movie because, from a male director, it would be criticism of the protagonist. But from a female director, it's a criticism of the expectations.

Rose Byrne does an excellent job and is the unwavering center of the story. She is mostly unlikeable but, considering her circumstances, one can't blame her. (even if society does anyway) I had not seen A$AP Rocky before and he was a highlight in a supporting role, adding some needed lightness. But his character didn't really add to the plot development. Conan O'Brien did a credible job of acting but was a bit of a distraction. People in the theater laughed out-loud at inappropriate times just because of who he is.

The mystical side of the movie kind of lost me - something to do with the universe and eyeballs and vaginal canals. (I think) Was the final scene a birth metaphor?

The technique of not showing some characters seemed more gimmicky than effective. I'm not even sure what was the point.

In summary, this critique of societal expectations on women is a worthy effort. Rose Byrne's acting is enough reason to watch it.

This is a very good move. It's also an awful movie. Jennifer Lawrence acts the heck out of it - seriously good work. It's a huge rule that could have been cartoonish but she gives it nuance and depth. Robert Pattinson isn't quite as good but he holds his own.

Postpartum depression is not a topic I've seen done before, surely because it makes us confront uncomfortable things about mothers, who we'd rather idealize. So I give the producers a lot of credit for tackling the subject.

But it's about an unlikable woman going through miserable times, causing havoc in her wake. Of course people aren't going to like that.

My only possible criticism is that the portrayal of mental illness didn't seem fully authentic to me. But I say "possible" because I'm not a mental health professional and obviously I have not had postpartum depression.

But, the protagonists problems weren't only postpartum depression but that pushes her over the edge. I'll guess that's how it usually works.