Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings404
dinaraaa's rating
Reviews19
dinaraaa's rating
I liked Julia Louis-Dreyfus from Saindfield and was curious to see her and also it was interesting how this is becoming relevant with current situation in the US, so I watched this show recently. This show is hilarious and witty! If you want to watch good quality shows, HBO is your answer. Comparing to Netflix with tons of average shows which are OK, but average, I really missed good quality TV shows and Veep is one of them. All dialogues are written so well, you just enjoy and laugh at the same time. Characters are also so well played, loved Selina, Amy, Dan and others, all of them are just perfect, so many well known actors portray different characters so well, it's on the edge of stupidity and reality that just makes it so funny. I would recommend it for sure!
I don't understand how this movie got so many awards? It's not even close to being worth nomination, and I have to say - Barbi was much better!
As a lover of films centered around scientific discoveries and the lives of great minds, I was really looking forward to watch Oppenheimer hoping for a cinematic experience like the Imitation Game or the Theory of everything. Unfortunately, Oppenheimer fell short of expectations, failing to deliver a compelling narrative or engage with its themes effectively.
One of the biggest issues with this movies is its lack of a clear purpose or thematic direction. While Barbi raised thought-provoking points about women's equality (I loved the speech of America Ferrera, even Ken's song raised some good points), Oppenheimer struggles to find its footing, feeling more like a documentary reciting cold facts. There is no central theme or purpose so I still don'tget it - why did Nolan make this movie? What is the message?
Pacing is another big issue, especially the first half of the movie - it's boooring, i had to force myself to watch till the end. The simultaneous presentation of different events like two court hearings +discussions on hydrogen bomb and the actual story of making the bomb without proper context only confused me, detracting from the overall narrative flow.
All those hearings and discussions in the beginning lost its meaning because of zero context provided on the purpose of those hearings until the end of the movie. That 1st was actually security clearance hearing - so what? What is the importance of that hearing I couldn't get it. He didn't go to jail, just got his access revoked. Why was it so important for this movie to waste viewer's time?
There are too many characters all men dressed in grey with zero added value leaving audiences struggling to connect with or even distinguish between them.
His relationships with women also suffer from a lack of emotional depth or meaningful interaction. Zero dialogue or expressions of affection only leave me wondering if he loved them or not? Was it his character that he has no emotions or was it just the fault of the movie script?
One of the biggest missed opportunities and disappointment is its failure to address the ethical implications of the atomic bomb. With no meaningful exploration of the moral dilemmas surrounding its creation or the devastation wrought by its use, the film feels shallow and devoid of substance. The absence of any critique of the US government's decision to drop the bomb on Japan or the absence of actual horrifying videos of the explosion or it's impact on people not even saying the impact of radiation after the explosion is particularly disappointing, leaving a significant thematic void in the narrative.
Despite these shortcomings, the acting performances are fine. However, even stellar performances cannot compensate for the lack of character development or meaningful engagement with the film's themes.
In conclusion, it is just a huge disappointment. In comparison Barbi, which effectively tackle important social issues, Oppenheimer falls short. I bet if Barbi was about men, it could have won all the awards.
As a lover of films centered around scientific discoveries and the lives of great minds, I was really looking forward to watch Oppenheimer hoping for a cinematic experience like the Imitation Game or the Theory of everything. Unfortunately, Oppenheimer fell short of expectations, failing to deliver a compelling narrative or engage with its themes effectively.
One of the biggest issues with this movies is its lack of a clear purpose or thematic direction. While Barbi raised thought-provoking points about women's equality (I loved the speech of America Ferrera, even Ken's song raised some good points), Oppenheimer struggles to find its footing, feeling more like a documentary reciting cold facts. There is no central theme or purpose so I still don'tget it - why did Nolan make this movie? What is the message?
Pacing is another big issue, especially the first half of the movie - it's boooring, i had to force myself to watch till the end. The simultaneous presentation of different events like two court hearings +discussions on hydrogen bomb and the actual story of making the bomb without proper context only confused me, detracting from the overall narrative flow.
All those hearings and discussions in the beginning lost its meaning because of zero context provided on the purpose of those hearings until the end of the movie. That 1st was actually security clearance hearing - so what? What is the importance of that hearing I couldn't get it. He didn't go to jail, just got his access revoked. Why was it so important for this movie to waste viewer's time?
There are too many characters all men dressed in grey with zero added value leaving audiences struggling to connect with or even distinguish between them.
His relationships with women also suffer from a lack of emotional depth or meaningful interaction. Zero dialogue or expressions of affection only leave me wondering if he loved them or not? Was it his character that he has no emotions or was it just the fault of the movie script?
One of the biggest missed opportunities and disappointment is its failure to address the ethical implications of the atomic bomb. With no meaningful exploration of the moral dilemmas surrounding its creation or the devastation wrought by its use, the film feels shallow and devoid of substance. The absence of any critique of the US government's decision to drop the bomb on Japan or the absence of actual horrifying videos of the explosion or it's impact on people not even saying the impact of radiation after the explosion is particularly disappointing, leaving a significant thematic void in the narrative.
Despite these shortcomings, the acting performances are fine. However, even stellar performances cannot compensate for the lack of character development or meaningful engagement with the film's themes.
In conclusion, it is just a huge disappointment. In comparison Barbi, which effectively tackle important social issues, Oppenheimer falls short. I bet if Barbi was about men, it could have won all the awards.
It's not a brilliant movie with genius acting thar would win Oscars but it's a movie that will make you feel good, will guarantee you have a good time and not think about serious stuff, just relax after a long, busy and stressful week, so the only thing you need is too relax and get some fun and motivation to go on with your routine. Yes, it's silly, not the best chemistry and some inconsistencies in the plot, but we need these type of movies. I don't know when we became so clinical and stopped producing RomComs as we used to. Sometimes you just need a silly movie that doesn't need you think, that you can watch and feel better and see Brad Pitt, beautiful nature and other nice actors. I wish we had more new movies like this.