How would you navigate conflicting feedback from stakeholders on an AR design project?

Besides understanding stakeholder needs, consider how each piece of feedback might impact the final AR experience. Evaluate if proposed suggestions can enhance usability and user satisfaction, and be open to testing and adjusting recommendations. This flexible approach helps in creating a more robust solution aligned with everyone's expectations.

To navigate conflicting feedback from stakeholders on an AR design project, first gather and understand the feedback from all parties. Identify common goals and assess the impact of each piece of feedback on user experience and project objectives. Facilitate discussions to reconcile differences, prototype and test various solutions, and communicate transparently about how feedback is being addressed. Be flexible and ready to make iterative changes based on stakeholder input and testing results.

From experience, common conflicting feedback on AR designs often centers around suggestions that reduce or eliminate the enjoyable aspects of the experience. However, by taking the time to break down and explain the importance of each element in driving consumer engagement, we can help clients understand the value of a well-designed AR experience and strike a balance between fun and functionality.

In my experiences dealing with the complexities and intricacies of an AR project in the context of an emergent practices it's important to focus on Linking rather than Ranking when evaluating conflicting opinions/feedback. To resolve conflict and find alignment each stakeholder must look for the Linking of ideas not their ranking. Ranking will lead to reduction of engagement and limit the flux of unexpected ideas to emerge. Linking will bring people to adopt a more dialogic approach and integrate all types of feedback in a way that invites more collaboration rather than more competition.

Empathizing with their perspectives Identifying their business goals and target audience Recognizing the role AR plays in their vision By doing so, you can: Find common ground among stakeholders Prioritize feedback that aligns with the project's core objectives Create an AR experience that satisfies both stakeholders and end-users

In my experience, it's crucial to start by deeply understanding each stakeholder's needs and motivations. This helps to identify the root of their concerns, ensuring you address the underlying issues rather than just surface-level disagreements.

Before diving into user testing, ensure a clear understanding of the AR technology's value. By aligning stakeholder expectations with the project's core objectives, we can prioritize feedback that directly impacts the user experience. This proactive approach will save time and resources, while ensuring that the AR solution effectively meets both business and user needs. Clarify AR's role: Define how AR will enhance the user experience and contribute to business goals. Gather stakeholder input: Conduct interviews to understand individual perspectives and motivations. Identify common ground: Find overlapping areas of agreement among stakeholders. Prioritize feedback: Focus on feedback that aligns with the project's core objectives.

First, set your goals like you’re picking toppings for a pizza—clear and delicious! Then, prioritize them like you're deciding which Netflix series to binge-watch first. Next, lay out a timeline that even a tortoise could follow! And remember, keep the chatter going throughout the entire process; communication is key, just like reminding your friends where the snacks are!

Augmented Reality (AR) is transforming online shopping by enabling customers to visualize products in their environment, boosting confidence and reducing returns. My work in 3D modeling for e-commerce has shown that AR enhances product presentations by showcasing scale, texture, and functionality better than traditional images. As AR becomes more integrated into mobile commerce, it will become essential for retailers aiming to offer personalized and immersive shopping experiences.

No existen, o no se conciben contradicciones en estas situaciones. Si llegase a haber un malentendido sería exclusivamente por falta de conocimiento entre las partes. Nuestro trabajo como programadores es enseñar que no todo es posible para el código, cada empresa cuenta con limitaciones, estás son las que causan dicho tema. Ya que sin limitaciones no existirían contradicciones, simplemente se aplica ambas ideas. En caso tal que el cliente luche por una opinión sobre lo imposible, pelear no resuelve nada, puedes mostrar diversas opciones Posibles que se asemejen a la idea. Pero no discutas, tu dignidad vale demasiado.

One of the basic checklist items before kickstarting the actual project is setting expectations and cadences with all relevant stakeholders. Not only does it help in collaboration from Day 1, but it also reduces friction which is generally involved with trying to get ad-hoc time on multiple calendars. A structured communication plan helps move things smoothly and is definitely worth the initial time investment.

Facilitate Dialogue: • Organize meetings/workshops for open discussion • Encourage stakeholders to share concerns and suggestions • Clarify project goals and align feedback with objectives Foster active listening among stakeholders to: Reach compromises Generate new Ideas

An approach I have used before involves organising workshops where stakeholders can openly discuss their perspectives. This encourages collaboration, allowing them to see where their views align or diverge, which often helps in finding common ground.

To foster productive collaboration and resolve conflicts, consider employing professional facilitation and UX expertise. A skilled facilitator can guide stakeholders through open discussions, ensuring everyone feels heard and valued. Additionally, a UX expert can provide valuable insights into user needs and preferences, helping to bridge the gap between stakeholder visions and the end-user experience.

Visual and interaction prototypes are powerful tools to simplify dialogs, especially in AR projects. They help stakeholders better understand, transport and discuss ideas. Instead of just describing concepts or ideas, prototypes let stakeholders see and interact with the AR elements. Prototypes can reveal design flaws or usability problems early, focusing discussions on real concerns. They give everyone a shared reference point, reducing misunderstandings about the project's direction. Quick adjustments to prototypes can address concerns immediately, showing stakeholders how their input shapes the project.

Este comentario está de más. Si no vas a dialogar con los clientes, para que rayos buscas clientes?... La pregunta adecuada sería "Prepara los diálogos" Es decir, tu cliente puede decir lo que quiera, eso no quiere decir que sea factible para el. Muchas veces la libertad del cliente de imaginar es la peor atadura que retiene el progreso en proyectos. Así que prepara una videoguia, límites, posibles objetivos, y limita el diálogo a lo esencial para ti. Aunque la población o opinión cualitativa es útil, no siempre es acertiva.

One issue I've seen with larger projects specifically the tendency of teams to work in silos which creates a lot of redundant work. Effective feedback involving all necessary stakeholders from Day 0 helps ensure we cut down time on rework. Managers might feel it's difficult to get coordination of cross-functional teams so early on and at regular basis, but the time lost in rework is much worse.

I've found that prioritising feedback based on the project's goals and user needs is essential. This can involve aligning feedback with business objectives, technical feasibility, and user experience, ensuring that the most impactful suggestions take precedence.

Prioritize feedback based on user experience, technical feasibility, and alignment with project goals. This focused approach ensures that changes have a maximum positive impact on the AR project.

Prioritization should be an ongoing process. As the project develops and new information comes to light, teams should be prepared to reevaluate and adjust their priorities, which can help ensure that the AR project remains responsive to changing requirements and upcoming opportunities throughout its development lifecycle.

Sería absurdo tener que pensar que nadie se nutre del Feedback. No pierdas tiempo esperando opiniones de clientes, pide permiso y sube el proyecto a Itch.io y pide opinión crítica de personas más adecuadas. Crece por tu cuenta y se autocrítico, no andes dependiendo de un papel para saber que lo arruinaste o no haz mejorado.

I would also suggest to give an experience to the stakeholders after each feature is built so that they would feel included in the process and would also know what is the current status of the product

Use an agile design and development loop which can incorporate feedback to fine-tune the MVP and can be leveraged later to enhance it as well. The loop should start off with a define and design stage, followed by development, testing and showcase. Assimilate the feedback, filter whatever's relevant, feasible and have a product-market fit. Go back to the define and design stage and add it to development sprints to move forward in the loop. Once MVP is achieved and the feedback can be added to a future roadmap, you can get out of the loop and enter an enhancement journey after the MVP go-live.

When dealing with conflicting feedback, I often use iterative prototyping. By creating low-fidelity prototypes quickly, you can test different ideas, gather additional input, and demonstrate how certain approaches better meet the project’s objectives.

Iterative prototyping is essential for resolving conflicts and refining the AR design. By visualizing suggestions within the AR environment, stakeholders can better understand the potential impact of their feedback. This hands-on approach promotes collaboration and helps to achieve a unified vision that aligns with both user needs and business goals.

Nunca, jamás, en un proyecto AR hagas modelado, iluminación o animación sin tener el molde de script prototipado. Si eres de Meta Spark y no sabes programar, no pasa nada, aún quedan muchos como Lens Studio que te permiten mover tus "filtros" a nuevos entornos. Para lo programadores, esto es el día a día, no creo que deba repetirlo aunque hagan AR

In my experience, establishing a decision-making framework early in the project is invaluable. This framework should be based on pre-agreed criteria such as user impact, cost, and time, helping to objectively resolve conflicts when they arise.

A decision-making framework is crucial for resolving conflicts and ensuring a successful AR project. By establishing clear criteria, such as user impact, innovation potential, and resource requirements, you can make informed decisions that align with the project's goals. This transparent approach fosters trust and collaboration among stakeholders, keeping the project on track.

BASADO PRINCIPALMENTE EN EL BENEFICIO AL CLIENTE O USUARIO CON ESTRATEGIAS DE ANALISIS DE DATOS Y PREGUNTA: LLEGA AL INDIVIDUO PARA SU USO ADECUADO? LA RA. ES UN PROCESO DE ADAPTACOÓN AL NUEVO MUNDO VIRTUAL

An AR project can get pretty complicated unless a specific short-term and long-term roadmap is set. With the technology so interesting, stakeholders can have expectations which might cause scope creep or budget creep. Similar to any typical project/product, it needs to be agile and started with an MVP. You can get buy-in from the business for say, 60% of the product, deliver, test, and then do 10% incrementally over the next few timelines. That ensures agility - which is extremely important with emerging technologies - it can help you pivot quickly if needed, without a lot of impact. And needless to say, keep stakeholders involved throughout as communication is key.

I've learned that managing expectations from the outset is key. Regularly updating stakeholders on progress and the rationale behind decisions ensures transparency, reducing the potential for conflicts to escalate as the project evolves.

Prototypes give everyone a shared reference point, reducing misunderstandings about the project's direction and they can show what's possible within technical constraints, guiding realistic expectations.