Demand Curve’s cover photo
Demand Curve

Demand Curve

E-Learning Providers

San Francisco, CA 8,047 followers

A step-by-step guide to get traction and grow your startup. Growth Program 2.0 is LIVE! 🚀

About us

Demand Curve helps early-stage operators build scalable, predictable growth engines, without hiring expensive agencies or full-time teams. 🚀 Growth Program 2.0: The lowest risk, fastest path to getting traction/growing. A membership designed for startup operators who want to learn and execute growth without hiring a full team yet. Powered by premium curriculum, AI growth co-pilot, and expert coaching. Trusted by 3,000+ startups. 📬 Growth Newsletter: Reaches 100,000+ founders and marketers every week with tactical, step-by-step growth frameworks. One of the most-read startup growth newsletters (40-50% open rates). 🎯 Growth Agency: Full-service execution across growth strategy, paid acquisition, and funnel optimization for companies ready to scale. We've helped grow Framer, Pilot, Ancestry, and dozens of startups. 📢 Newsletter Sponsorships: Get your brand in front of 100,000+ founders and growth operators. Learn more at demandcurve.com Backed by Y Combinator (S19)

Website
https://www.demandcurve.com
Industry
E-Learning Providers
Company size
11-50 employees
Headquarters
San Francisco, CA
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2018
Specialties
Marketing, Marketing Training, Digital Marketing, Startup Growth, and Growth Marketing

Locations

Employees at Demand Curve

Updates

  • Demand Curve reposted this

    View profile for Kevin DePopas

    Chief Growth Officer @ Demand Curve | Techstars Alum

    My post last week struck a raw nerve w/ founders. 130k imps, 308 cmmts, 56 reposts, countless DMs. ...a lot of founders are bleeding in silence. 🤐 If you missed it... I posted about my 7.5yr startup journey where: → My avg. annual salary was $54.7k. → The total opportunity cost was between $1.65M and $2.4M. The response was overwhelming. Thank you for all the DMs, the comments, and the support. (And all the love for my wife, Ashleigh DePopas 😂). A lot of you rightly pointed out that you can't put a price tag on life experience. And I 100% agree. I'm certainly not trying to discount the journey. ("journey before destination"...Sanderson readers ✊) Just trying to have the honest conversation about the financial hit most founders take in silence. The most common question I got was,  "What would you do differently?"  I'm working on a full post with my honest answers to that soon. But the short answer is:  I'd do everything I could to get to an ANSWER faster. Is this product/company viable/scalable? Which brings me back to today... It's the LAST DAY of the early-bird sale for the Demand Curve Growth Program 2.0. We built it to help founders avoid wasting time. The deal ends tonight at 11:59pm EST.  If my story resonated, check it out before the price goes back up. Appreciate you all for being part of this conversation. P.S. Hope you enjoy the launch vid! Had a ton of fun making it using ElevenLabs and Artlist. I think AI is crossing the uncanny valley.

  • Demand Curve reposted this

    View profile for Kevin DePopas

    Chief Growth Officer @ Demand Curve | Techstars Alum

    What's the ROI on a failed Techstars startup? My avg. annual salary over 7.5yrs = $54.7k 🫠 My opportunity cost, north of $1.2M. The video below is a time-lapse of that journey.  Don't get me wrong, some of those years were the best of my life. I got to work on something I was passionate about with people I loved. But I want to talk about the economic reality of betting YEARS of your life on a startup. (for most founders) To help you baseline... → We got admitted to Techstars. → We raised $2.4M over the 7.5yrs. → Revenue peaked at approx. $50k MRR Over that 7.5 year period, here's what I actually paid myself: → Years 1-2: $0 → Years 3-4: ~$50k/year → Years 5-6: ~$80k/year → Year 7-7.5: ~$100k/year  (before dropping back to zero at the end) = Total earnings: ~$410,000. Now, let's say I'd stuck with a corporate path (say, product management after my stint at Deloitte)... A conservative estimate: → Base Salary (7.5yrs): ~$1,150,000 → Stock/RSUs: ~$400,000 → 401k Match: ~$60,000 = Total Comp: ~$1.61 Million An aggressive (but still realistic) estimate: → Base Salary (7.5yrs): ~$1,400,000 → Stock/RSUs: ~$700,000 → 401k Match: ~$70,000 = Total Comp: ~$2.17 Million When you subtract my actual startup earnings (~$410k), the direct compensation gap lands between $1.2M and $1.8M. But sadly for me, that's not the full economic cost. Looking at the S&P's returns from that period, the missed compound interest on that unearned cash adds another $450k to $600k to the total. That brings the full economic cost of my 7.5-year journey to somewhere between $1.65M and $2.4M. Looking at these numbers, I honestly feel bad for my wife, Ash. 🫤 She supported us through it. This isn't meant to be a sob story. It's just the statistical reality of entrepreneurship. Studies show around 90% of startups fail. Far fewer actually have life-changing financial outcomes. (Remember, just because a startup doesn't "fail" doesn't mean it's allowing you to retire at 40.) If you're a founder reading this *hate to say it* you're likely making a similar financial sacrifice, whether you've run the numbers or not. The takeaway here isn't "don't do startups." It's that your grit and determination isn't an infinite resource. The goal isn't to bleed for a decade (or 75% of one) to prove a point. It's to get to an answer ("Is this working or not?") as QUICKLY as possible. Or GTFO! Anyway, I bring up this story b/c we just launched our Growth Program 2.0 at Demand Curve. It's built to help founding teams get traction and grow as fast as possible. I wish I had it back in 2016. If any of this resonated with you, if you're feeling stuck or feel like you've been at it for too long, check it out. Or better yet, let's have a real conversation. Connect with me. Send me a DM. Write about your experience in the comments. Hell, email me. Because this is your life, and I think we can help.

  • View organization page for Demand Curve

    8,047 followers

    We launched Growth Program 2.0 yesterday! $51.2k sold in the first hour. 240 memberships by EOD. The early numbers are exciting. But they aren't surprising. We had thousands of founders on the waitlist, b/c startup operators are struggling with the same problem... When a solo founder or small team can vibe code a SaaS MVP in a few weeks, building/launching a product isn't the bottleneck anymore. Finding a reproducible way to affordably acquire customers IS. We've lived it. Without a growth engine, you substitute sheer volume of activity for experience. You'll convince yourself you have product-market fit before you actually do. And you'll potentially waste months/YEARS pivoting without data, hoping to land on something that works. "just one more pivot!" But how LONG will it take to find real traction? What's the opportunity cost of staying stuck? There's a playbook to get unstuck. Seasoned teams are executing it. They just have systems in place. The same ones we've taught 3,000+ startups. They treat their startup like a game. A series of hypotheses that need to be proven or disproven. We rebuilt Growth Program 2.0 to help non-experts think like experts. So you can de-risk your journey and move UP or move ON and stop wasting your time. The early-bird launch is officially live through Sep 17th at 11:59 PM Eastern. And spots at the current price are limited. If you're ready to take traction & growth seriously, see the details and grab a spot at the link in the comments before the next price jump.

  • View organization page for Demand Curve

    8,047 followers

    QUALITY is your destination. QUANTITY is how you get there. A 1960s experiment demonstrates why. In the 1960s, a University of Florida photography professor, Jerry Uelsmann, divided his class into two groups: Group A: Take as many photos as possible (graded by quantity - 100 photos = A) Group B: Take one perfect photo (graded by quality) At the end of the semester, guess which group produced the BEST photos? Group A. Every single one. While Group B sat theorizing about perfection, Group A was learning from hundreds of failed attempts and iterations. Sound familiar? → Your internal strategy meetings < Their 50 customer conversations → Your perfect product roadmap < Their 10 failed feature tests → Your perfect launch strategy < Their 5 scrappy growth experiments Which group are you?

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Demand Curve reposted this

    View profile for Kevin DePopas

    Chief Growth Officer @ Demand Curve | Techstars Alum

    "You should give this to every startup founder or marketer you meet." That's what I told Gil Templeton after reading his Startup Positioning Framework. It breaks down how to structure value prop messaging that actually relates to your end users - not just for your website, but across every piece of marketing/sales messaging you produce. We've condensed 8 years of experience teaching growth to 3,000+ startups at Y-Combinator, Techstars, and other top accelerators - and we've identified a pattern... Most founders fall into what we call "The What Trap." They obsess over explaining WHAT they do. → Their features. → Their process. → Their "innovation." But your customers only care about "What's in it for me?" And if you can't answer that in 5 seconds, you've lost them. Here's what happens when you're stuck in The What Trap: → Your messaging is technically accurate but emotionally vacant → People read your landing page and still don't get it (or aren't compelled to convert) → Your CAC remains high because no one understands your value → It "seems" like paid media doesn't work for your business No amount of growth hacks or AI tools will fix this. ✍️ The B.A.D. to B.E.S.T. Framework: Instead of B.A.D. copy → Boastful → Abstract → Dry Create B.E.S.T. copy: → Benefit-Led: What they get, not what you made → Empathetic: Show you understand their problem → Story-Driven: Anchor to a relatable moment → Transformational: Focus on how their life improves Some transformations from the framework: ❌ "24/7 motion-activated cameras" ✅ "Feel safe at home, even when it's just you and a creaky floorboard" ❌ "Advanced AI-powered analytics" ✅ "Stop guessing which ads actually make money" ❌ "Science-based sleep optimization technology" ✅ "Wake up feeling human, not hungover" The first describes "what." The second answers "What's in it for me?" I'm sharing Gil's complete 13-page guide that includes: → The full B.A.D. to B.E.S.T. methodology → Step-by-step exercises for B2B, services, and consumer products → Real before/after examples from actual companies → The "So What?" test to validate every line of copy → Tips for making the pivot from feature-focused to benefit-led This is core curriculum from the Demand Curve Growth Program. Your company's messaging and positioning is the underpinning for all other growth efforts. Fix your messaging first, everything else second. Just leave a reaction, comment anything, and I'll send it over 👇

  • $30M gone. In 60 days. All because they removed an orange from a box. We've been digging into rebranding disasters lately, and one crucial pattern jumps out…every failed rebrand ignores the customers who already love them. Here's what we mean. 🍊 Tropicana: → Swapped their iconic orange-with-straw for minimalist design. → Customers couldn't find it on shelves. → New packaging looked like a generic store brand. → Lost $30M in 2 months. 🥪 Quiznos: → Thought shrieking rodents would go viral. → Turns out it just looked gross and unappetizing. → Competitor Subway kept it simple and fresh (and crushed them). 🚗 Jaguar: → Ditched 90 years of heritage for a car-less EV ad. → "Copy Nothing" confused everyone. → Jury still out on sales (car hasn't launched). → Public reception was categorically negative. 📺 HBO Max → Max: → Dropped HBO from their brand. → Threw away the most premium brand in TV. → App downloads tanked. → Had to walk it back to HBO Max. 🔥 JCPenney: → Eliminated sales and coupons. → Loyal customers felt betrayed. → $4B revenue loss in one year. The common thread in these failures… They rebranded for customers they WISH they had, alienating the loyal customers who were already buying. 📋 So, when does a rebrand actually work? → Your positioning has genuinely shifted → You're being confused with competitors → You're targeting new segments (without alienating current ones!) → You've outgrown your early brand → You're entering a growth phase (often tied to financing) Rebrands are dangerous when they aren't built on deep customer insight. Don't let founder insecurity, an "outdated" logo, or other vanity metrics drive your rebrand. Focus on your strengths and don't make the mistake of erasing them, or you might find yourself ranking among the top rebrand fails. What horrible rebrands did we miss? *cough cough* UBER

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Demand Curve reposted this

    View profile for Kevin DePopas

    Chief Growth Officer @ Demand Curve | Techstars Alum

    Champagne and poker? Nah. ChatGPT x Gmail x Attio. How I 1.75x'd revenue in 30 days. In June, Justin (our CEO) and I had a realization: Our newsletter sponsorship revenue stream was basically running itself. → 100% inbound inquiries. → Very little "selling" via email. → No sales calls, no outbound. I decided to run a quick sprint. Could I 2x our sponsor revenue in 30 days? ...with minimal effort. Here's what happened: 📊 The starting point: → Basic Notion database as our "CRM" → No unified inbox → Comms scattered across email threads → No systematic follow-up process → No outbound (as mentioned) 🧭 My 80/20 plan: Instead of chasing new leads, I decided to focus on closing brands that already know us: A. Previous sponsors B. Warm inquiries that never converted To reach these people, I'd need to do a couple things: 1. Get organized (select a real CRM to track comms) 2. Set up outbound campaigns 3. Personalize at scale 4. Actually follow up (novel concept, lol) 🛠️ Executing the plan: First, I selected Attio as our CRM. The AI-native features caught my eye. Plus it feels like Notion (which our team uses). Second, I started building my two campaigns. Drafting email copy can take longer than it needs to. I decided to try my hand at vibe-coding a solution. Built a Gmail scraper in 20 mins. Pulled 2 weeks of my REAL sales convos. Fed them to Claude to write campaigns that sound like me. Third, I launched the campaigns. Every email had a custom P.S. line based on the company's actual product. (Research from 💜 🔮 Will Allred at Lavender AI shows this can boost replies by 35%) 📈 Results (as of today, 7/15): → 32% reply rate → 24 deals initiated from outreach → 4 package deals closed so far → 9 deals in active conversation → July/August revenue up 1.75x vs May/June (tracking towards 2x revenue) 💡Some things I learned: → Tools like Attio can consolidate your sales stack We went from Notion + spreadsheets + 3 other tools to just Attio. Meeting recordings, enrichment, sequences all in one place. → Email scrapers are really powerful And everyone can do it. You don't need to be technical. ChatGPT will literally write the code for you. → We need to ramp an "always on" outbound motion This experiment proved we're leaving cash on the table. Setting up recurring campaigns now. → Your "perfectly fine" systems might be broken We thought our sponsorship process was solid. Turns out we were operating at 50% capacity. So the old adage, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" Actually seems like pretty terrible advice. With minimal effort, we nearly 2x'd our sponsor revenue. This same approach can work for any revenue stream you've been ignoring. So, what'd you do last night? Party or dig for revenue? Want the full case study + my Gmail scraper code? 💬 Drop a comment or shoot me a DM. --- Full transparency: Attio sponsored this post, but this was a real project we'd already set out to tackle. We still use Attio as our CRM.

  • Demand Curve reposted this

    View profile for Kevin DePopas

    Chief Growth Officer @ Demand Curve | Techstars Alum

    The Fastest Way to Kill Your Startup? (It's Not What You Think) A lot of founders think... More channels = More growth It feels intuitive. "Someone will see us on LinkedIn ...then Instagram, ...then they'll get an email, ...then a mailer, ...they can't help but BUY!" But here's what you realize once you're running the play. Every time you add a new marketing channel: - you split your budget. - And your time. - And your focus. (You might actually split your sanity too. Been there 😅) You end up digging a bunch of shallow holes. None of them deep enough to strike water. The worst part: You potentially come away with false negatives on channels that WOULD have worked. If you gave them a little more focus and cash. The smarter move: → Test quickly. → Find your 1-2 channels that work. → Squeeze out all you can. Even if your incremental CAC grows as you saturate a channel, so long as ROAS is profitable, keep rinsing and repeating. Growth isn't about doing more of EVERYTHING. It's about doing more of the RIGHT thing. Who else has come to this realization? 💬 Tag a founder who needs this 👉 Follow for more growth insights 🔔 Join the Demand Curve Newsletter for deeper analysis & breakdowns

  • Demand Curve reposted this

    Your video ads aren't converting because of weak hooks.   Most brands make the mistake of leading with boring product shots or "Hi, I'm..." openings. But the first 3 seconds determine everything. In this video I break down 5 of the most effective hook types (and I actually use each one while explaining them). Here’s what actually stops the scroll: 🧠 Pattern Interrupt → Break viewers out of their doom scroll → When everyone's polished, something raw wins → Human brain notices what's different 🔍 Curiosity Gap → Create an open loop that demands closure → "The one hook most brands never use..." → Tease without giving everything away ⚡ Problem-Agitate → Your ads aren't converting (problem) → Customers slip through cracks while competitors win them (agitate) → Make inaction feel costly ✅ Social Proof → "I've used these to grow hundreds of clients" → Lead with credibility markers upfront → People trust what others have validated 🔥 Contrarian → "Everything you know about X has been a lie" → Challenge conventional wisdom boldly → Just make sure you can back it up The difference between a scroll and a conversion often comes down to those first 3 seconds. Next week I’ll share the 5 more effective hook types that you should try out. 💬 Comment below and let me know which hook type was your favorite. 👉 Follow for more ad insights that actually work.

Similar pages

Browse jobs

Funding

Demand Curve 1 total round

Last Round

Seed
See more info on crunchbase