Recruitment & HR

LinkedIn asks you to post today to celebrate "a woman who's made an impact on your career." But these kinds of posts, even earnestly written, tend to leave us feeling hollow. If we're looking for real progress towards fairness and equality at work, here's what to do instead: 🪴 Did you know that if there's only one woman on a shortlist of qualified candidates, she has a whopping 0% chance of being hired? Simply expanding shortlists to include more than one woman (and for that matter, people from historically marginalized communities) helps counter biased decision-making. 📋 Standardized process can be a surprisingly easy way to mitigate bias. Structured interviewing, standardized skill-based assessments directly related to job tasks, and standardized scoring rubrics can make comparisons across candidates more fair and substantially reduce subtle gender discrimination. 🌻 Incentivize flexibility for ALL workers, not just women. In a vacuum, harmful norms may arise that imply these arrangements are only utilized by those who "don't value their careers as much," penalizing workers of all genders. Celebrate senior leaders, especially men, who model greater flexibility and wellbeing so that all workers are licensed to do the same. 🔍 Conduct a pay equity audit, seeking to examine not only outcomes like total compensation, but also distribution of candidates across roles. If men and women in the same role are getting paid similarly, but women are dramatically overclustered in low-paying roles, you've still got a problem. ❤️🩹 Create an anonymous and/or informal process to report and addressing discrimination and harassment. A lower-stakes way to address harm, in addition to training bystander intervention and modelling respectful communication, accountability, and timely feedback from the top, can mitigate daily harms for all workers. Some folks hesitate to push for these practices because they feel more committing than just posting on social media. They're right — because with more effort comes more impact. So reach out to a few of your colleagues and advocates within your workplace to work together on pushing for these changes. Ten posts in isolation pale in comparison to the impact ten peoples' collective organizing might have on your workplace and everyone in it! Remember: International Women's Day is a chance for us not just to celebrate women, but to sharpen our advocacy alongside women, to build a future that's better, brighter, and more fair for all of us.

LinkedIn just responded to the bias claims. They think they refuted my research. I believe they just confirmed it. Following the recent discussions on whether the algorithm suppresses women's voices, LinkedIn's Head of Responsible AI and AI Governance, Sakshi Jain, posted a new Engineering Blog post to "clarify" how the feed works (link in comments). I’ve analysed the post. Far from debunking the issue, it inadvertently confirms the exact mechanism of Proxy Bias I identified in my report (link in comments). Here is the breakdown: 1. The blog spends most of its time denying that the algorithm uses "gender" as a variable. And I agree. My report never claimed the code contained if gender == female. That would be Direct Discrimination. I have always argued this is about Indirect Discrimination via proxies. 2. Crucially, the blog explicitly lists the signals they do optimise for: "position," "industry," and "activity." These are the exact proxies my report flagged. -> Industry/Position: Men are historically overrepresented in high-visibility industries (Tech/Finance) and senior roles. Optimising for these signals without a fairness constraint systematically amplifies men. -> Activity: The (now-viral) trend of women rewriting profiles in "male-coded" language (and seeing 3-figure percentage lift) proves that the algorithm’s "activity" signal favours male linguistic patterns ("agentic" vs. "communal"). 3. The blog confirms the algorithm is neutral in intent (it doesn't see gender) but discriminatory in outcome (because it optimises for biased proxies). In the UK, this is the textbook definition of Indirect Discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. In the EU, this is a Systemic Risk under the Digital Services Act (DSA). LinkedIn has proven that they can fix this. Their Recruiter product uses "fairness-aware ranking" to mitigate these exact proxies (likely for AI Act compliance). The question remains: Why is that same fairness framework not being applied to the public feed? 👉 What We Are Doing About It Analysis is important, but action is essential. I am proud to support the new petition, "Calling for Fair Visibility for All on LinkedIn". This isn't just a complaint; it’s a demand for transparency. We are calling for an independent equity audit of the algorithm and a clear mechanism to report unexplained visibility collapse. If you are tired of guessing which "proxy" you tripped over today, join us and sign the petition (link in the comments).

The European Parliament has officially passed Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation that fundamentally shifts the responsibility for textile waste management to fashion brands and retailers – with far-reaching global implications. This new law requires all producers, including e-commerce platforms, to cover the full cost of collecting, sorting, and recycling textiles, regardless of whether they are based within or outside the EU. The financial burden of Europe's textile waste now falls squarely on the brands that create it. What are the critical business implications? UNIVERSAL SCOPE: The legislation applies to all producers selling in the EU market, including those of clothing, accessories, footwear, home textiles, and curtains. No company is exempt based on location. FAST FASHION PENALTY: Member states must specifically address ultra-fast and fast fashion practices when determining EPR financial contributions, creating cost penalties for unsustainable business models. GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTION: As the world's largest textile importer, the EU's new rules will ripple across global supply chains, particularly impacting exporters from Bangladesh, Vietnam, China, and India who supply much of Europe's fast fashion. TIMELINE PRESSURE: Officially adopted September 2025, this creates immediate operational and financial planning requirements. COMPETITIVE RESHAPING: Brands and retailers will inevitably pass increased costs down their supply chains, fundamentally altering supplier relationships and pricing structures globally. What are the implications for various stakeholders? For CEOs and board members: This represents more than regulatory compliance – it's a complete business model transformation. Companies must now integrate end-of-life costs into product pricing, rethink supplier partnerships, and accelerate circular design strategies. For sustainability and decarbonisation executives: This creates unprecedented opportunities for circular economy solutions, sustainable material innovation, and traceability system development across global supply chains. Link: https://lnkd.in/dTyHtHuD #sustainablefashion #circulareconomy #textilwaste #epr #fashionindustry #sustainability #supplychainmanagement #fastfashion #environmentalregulation #businessstrategy #decarbonisation #textilerecycling #fashionceos #boardgovernance #climateaction #wastemanagement #producerresponsibility #fashionsustainability #textileindustry #greenbusiness

The fact that 81% of young people set to inherit large wealth are planning to fire dad's financial advisor is not a surprise. The surprise is how few legacy wealth management firms and private banks have any plan to address this whatsoever. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure they have meetings about it and pay consultants to "produce educational content" for the household offspring. But then they also have million-dollar minimums or payout grids disincentivizing FAs from taking sub-$5 million accounts. And that's why they're going to lose and you're going to win. They don't want it badly enough. They're not willing to put time, effort or capital on the line. Here are three actions you can take right now: INVEST in hiring and training younger advisors. Feed them now so they'll be ready for this opportunity when the time comes. It's a leap of faith to put new prospective clients in front of less experienced CFPs. Have faith in your next-gen advisors. Take the risk. SEGMENT your service tiers so that there is a grown-up, beyond-robo solution in place for HENRY (High Earner Not Rich Yet) households that doesn't infantilize them. Treat young adults like they're important to the firm, not a side business or a farm team. Educate them about what you're doing to the point they can repeat it back to you. CREATE so you can get in front of the inheritor generation, winning hearts and minds on the platforms they use. Communicate in an authentic way. Under 40's will not be marketed to by brands, they want to believe in you and your people. Do you believe? If not, they won't either. Read Robert Frank for CNBC https://lnkd.in/ewdUzVTk

Louder for the people at the back 🎤 Many organisations today seem to have shifted from being institutions that develop great talent to those that primarily seek ready-made talent. This trend overlooks the immense value of individuals who, despite lacking experience, possess a great attitude, commitment, and a team-oriented mindset. These qualities often outweigh the drawbacks of hiring experienced individuals with a fixed and toxic mindset. The best organisations attract talent with their best years ahead of them, focusing on potential rather than past achievements. Let’s be clear this is more about mindset and willingness to learn and unlearn as apposed to age. To realise the incredible potential return, organisations must commit to creating an environment where continuous development is possible. This requires a multi-faceted approach: 1. Robust Training Programmes: Employers should invest in comprehensive training programmes that equip employees with the necessary skills for their roles. This includes on-the-job training, mentorship programmes, online courses, and workshops. 2. Redefining Hiring Criteria: Organisations should revise their hiring criteria to focus more on candidates’ potential and willingness to learn rather than solely on prior experience or formal qualifications. Behavioural interviews, aptitude tests, and probationary periods can help assess a candidate's ability to learn and adapt. 3. Partnerships with Educational Institutions: Companies can collaborate with educational institutions to design curricula that align with industry needs. Apprenticeship programmes, internships, and cooperative education can bridge the gap between academic learning and practical job skills. 4. Lifelong Learning Culture: Encouraging a culture of lifelong learning within organisations is crucial. Employers should provide ongoing education opportunities and support for professional development. This includes continuous skills assessment and access to resources for upskilling and reskilling. 5. Inclusive Recruitment Practices: Employers should implement inclusive recruitment practices that remove biases and barriers. Blind recruitment, diversity quotas, and targeted outreach programmes can help ensure that diverse candidates are given a fair chance. By implementing these measures, organisations can develop a workforce that is adaptable, innovative, and resilient, ensuring sustainable success and growth.

It shouldn’t be dangerous to speak your mind in any meeting or in any conversation at work. But employers know that it is dangerous, and that’s why they send out confidential employee engagement surveys. 68% of respondents to my poll on LinkedIn last week said that these surveys are not really confidential. If you know it is not safe for employees to speak their minds at work, that’s what you should focus on – solving that problem! It’s like there is a wall of goo between you and your employees, toxic goo, and rather than get rid of the wall of toxic goo you simply send a little paper airplane over the goo wall and tell employees to read what you wrote on the paper airplane, write something on it yourself and find a safe way to get the paper airplane back to you. That is both foolish and unethical. If you know it is not safe to speak your mind at work and you just send out a survey instead of tackling the real issue, you have failed at leadership.

Most people get Reference Checks wrong! Here's how to get them right 👉🏻 Throughout my journey, I've had to make 1000s of hires and often struggled with evaluation through the standard interviewing processes. I read somewhere that ~60% senior hires go wrong even after the most meticulous processes so I wondered how to improve the odds. 🤔 What I discovered is that there's no substitute for spending time with the candidates and conducting ‘unnamed’ ref checks through your own network. But what I also learnt is that not every ref check is the same and you can end up with very different outcomes depending on how it’s done. So, through reading and experience, I came with the best practices that I christened with the acronym "PEARL", and here it is for the FIRST time🔥 P - Promise Reciprocity Busy professionals don't dole out intel freely. So, you must offer to return the favor – something as simple as “If ever you need my help for a ref check or otherwise, I'd be happy to help". A senior leader will immediately see its value & perhaps become more ‘available’ on the call. E - Ensure Confidentiality This is critical, especially in India. Candor is not part of our culture, so assure the referrer that you understand the sensitivity of this call and will keep it 100% confidential. Also that you'd expect the same if they ever choose to call you for a reference. If you still sense some hesitancy, maybe throw an ‘offer’ of a good-faith NDA. Don’t worry, nobody ever takes it up but it makes them less guarded. A - Ask questions that force specificity (close-ended & open-ended) Broad questions like – "How was their work ethic?" “Does she work hard?” - are a complete waste of time. You need to ask 2nd order questions that make it comfortable for the referrer to answer without feeling like they're maligning the candidate. For eg - “How do you think we can help the candidate grow?" is better than "Can you tell me about their weaknesses?” R - Retrieve critical insights Actively listen and probe for specifics. Did the candidate consistently meet deadlines? Why or why not? How did they handle pressure? Did they run towards solving problems or look for directions to carry out? These details paint a picture beyond the resume. L - Learn rehire potential And finally, the golden question – "Are you willing to re-hire or work with the candidate again? Why or why not?" Regardless of what the referrer may have said up to this point, most senior folks will have a hard-time giving you a false or misleading response to this one. This is the true gauge of the candidate’s potential and one I put a lot of weight in. To conclude, thank the referrer for their time, assure confidentiality again and commit to a quid pro quo. This leaves the door open for other ref checks you might wish to do in the future 😏 So, there you have it - A PEARL from my collection🙌🏻 Do comment with something that’s worked for you that I may have missed :) #hiring #startups #leadership

Why rely solely on surveys when you can uncover the true state of DEI through concrete metrics? This is a question that echoes in my mind each time I embark on a new journey with a client. Surveys can provide valuable opinions, but they often fall short of capturing real facts and the nuanced realities of individuals within an organization. 🔎 Here are 6 key DEI metrics that truly matter: 📍 Attrition Rates: Take a closer look at why employees are leaving, especially among different groups. This will help you understand if there are specific challenges or issues that need to be addressed to improve retention. 📍 Leadership Pipeline Diversity: Evaluate the diversity within your leadership team. Are there opportunities for underrepresented individuals to rise into leadership roles? Are they equally represented on all levels of leadership? 📍 Promotion and Advancement Rates: Assess if all employees, regardless of background, are getting equal opportunities to advance in their careers. By monitoring promotion and advancement rates, you can identify any biases and work towards creating a level playing field. 📍 Pay Equity: Ensure that everyone is paid fairly and equally for their work. Address any discrepancies in pay based on not only gender, but also race, age, ethnicity or other intersectional factors. 📍 Hiring Pipeline Diversity: Examine the diversity of candidates in your hiring process. Are you attracting a wide range of talent from different backgrounds? Tracking this metric helps you gauge the effectiveness of your recruitment efforts in creating a diverse workforce. 📍 Employee Engagement by Demographic: Measure the level of engagement and satisfaction among employees from various groups. Are there any disparities in engagement levels? Run the crossings of identity diversity and organizational one. By focusing on these 6 concrete metrics, you can gain real insights into your organization's DEI progress based on actionable data that drives progress. ________________________________________ Are you looking for more HR tips and DEI content like this?  📨 Join my free DEI Newsletter: https://lnkd.in/dtgdB6XX

ESOPs don’t always work, but when they do its magical 5000 Swiggy employees made around 9000 crores in the IPO Some would have made 100 cr plus Many many more would have made 10 cr plus Life changing money for most people and will enable risk taking and another 100 plus startups from this set If you are evaluating offers from startups with significant ESOP component, this is how you should evaluate it For an employee to make meaningful money through ESOPs, 2 things must happen: - Growth in company value - Employee friendly ESOP policies that ensures employees make money when company grows a) Growth in Company Value This is where employees need to think like investors Just like investors are particularly wary of what valuation they are coming in, entry valuations should matter for employees too ESOPs are allotted basis the current valuation The likelihood of a 10x growth in your ESOPs if you are joining a startup valued at 100 million $ is much higher compared to joining a startup already valued at 5 billion $ A 75 lakh ESOP allotment in a 1000 cr valued org with chances of a 10x growth could be a better offer than 2 cr ESOP allotment at a 20000 cr valued org with lower chances of future growth The second thing to judge is the business model and the likelihood of the business to grow( very important for Seed/Series A/B startups) b) ESOP Policies The startup ecosystem is full of stories where employees didn’t make money despite the company growing and having multiple liquidity events. Swiggy, Zomato are examples of great ESOP policy. Many companies have extremely shitty ones Here are the things that should matter most while evaluating policies: 1. Vesting Schedule: The standard is 25% vesting after every year. Any schedule which has higher vesting towards the later years is a red flag Vesting should never be performance linked If performance is bad, it is management’s responsibility to fire 2. Vesting on Leaving/Startups Exit: If you exit, you should retain all options that has vested If a startup gets acquired before all your options vest, there should be accelerated vesting 3. ESOP Communication: There should always be written communication( preferably through ESOP portal) Verbal communication for ESOPs is a huge red flag 4. Strike Price: Strike Price should be as low as possible( Re 1 ideally). This maximizes the value creation for the employee 5. Holding/Exercise Period: Converting options to shares is a major tax liability exercise. With limited exercise period, it becomes impossible for employees to exercise as it means paying up to 40% real taxes on notional capital gains in an asset class that is not liquid Ideally, holding period should be infinite for vested options, even after exit This enables employees to wait for liquidity events without incurring upfront taxation to be paid out of own pocket

Essential Cybersecurity Knowledge for IT Professionals As technology becomes increasingly integral to business operations, a solid understanding of cybersecurity fundamentals is crucial for all IT professionals. This knowledge is key to effectively safeguarding our organizations against evolving threats. Key cybersecurity concepts every IT professional should understand: 1. Phishing: Recognizing and preventing email-based attacks that can lead to data breaches. 2. Ransomware: Understanding encryption-based extortion tactics to ensure business continuity. 3. Denial-of-Service (DoS): Identifying and mitigating attacks that disrupt service availability. 4. Man-in-the-Middle (MitM): Protecting the integrity and confidentiality of data in transit. 5. SQL Injection: Safeguarding databases against unauthorized access and manipulation. 6. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Securing web applications against client-side code injection. 7. Zero-Day Exploits: Developing strategies to defend against previously unknown vulnerabilities. 8. DNS Spoofing: Preventing the redirection of traffic to malicious destinations. Proficiency in these areas enables IT professionals to identify risks, implement effective countermeasures, and contribute to a robust security posture. Continuous learning in cybersecurity is not just beneficial—it's imperative for the protection of our digital assets and the trust of our stakeholders. What cybersecurity topics do you think deserve more attention in IT professional development?