Testimonials

The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review, and publishers must find a way to properly value it. My experience in this regard with MDPI publications is very positive.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team is responsive and supportive. This facilitates a smooth and rewarding review experience, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to the scientific community.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of MDPI.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for major revisions, which was very good; it provides deadlines similar to other journals for minor revisions. After acceptance, it was published online within 3 to 5 days, which is quite amazing.

Article in Energies: The Degradation Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance Based on a Transformer Model

Less

Publishing in Antioxidants has been a very positive experience. The editors were professional and helpful, and the reviewers were knowledgeable. In addition, the whole process was smooth and rapid, resulting in a noticeable improvement to the paper. I would recommend this journal to anyone considering publishing in this area.

Article in Antioxidants: Oxidative Stress in Genetic Cataract Formation

Less

The entire process of submission, peer review and editing the article ran very smoothly and professionally. The Editors were quick and efficient and the peer reviewers noticed areas of weakness that I had missed in the article and which certainly improved the published version.

Article in Multimodal Technologies and Interaction: Multisensory Technologies for Inclusive Exhibition Spaces: Disability Access Meets Artistic and Curatorial Research

Less

The publishing in Algorithms was really joyful, mostly because of editing assistance. All of the mismatches with the Journal format in draft versions of my paper were clearly highlighted, which made a correcting process smooth and fast. Also all of the reviews of the paper were thoughtful and allowed me to improve its quality.

Article in Algorithms: Not So Robust after All: Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks to Unseen Adversarial Attacks

Less

I'll state it in short words: I like reviewing for MDPI because they care about me as a reviewer, offering a reward for my job and giving it value. They care that the review is appropriate, fast, and reliable. They recognise its importance and demonstrate it.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

I am glad to participate in the review process; I review interesting research papers and many of them are outstanding.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

I would like to commend the MDPI Energies editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency and understanding throughout the process of handling our article submission. All our queries and requests were handled promptly and professionally, and this greatly contributed to a very satisfactory publishing experience for us as the authors. I highly recommend the journal to any authors wishing to publish open access.

Article in Energies: Demand-Side Management as a Network Planning Tool: Review of Drivers, Benefits and Opportunities for South Africa

Less

The process for publishing in MDPI is clear, with a high-quality reviewing process and instructions easy to follow.

Article in Energies: A Polynomial Synthesis Approach to Design and Control an LCL-Filter-Based PWM Rectifier with Extended Functions Validated by SIL Simulations

Less

I started posting on MDPI about 5 years ago. I immediately saw the huge difference with other publishing houses–fast and clear deadlines, criteria for accepting manuscripts and a good professional team. In addition, there is a very good and stimulating system of vouchers and bonuses. For this reason, I no longer use other publishers for magazine publications. Very fast manuscript processing and review process. Maximum service and support from the technical team.

Article in Energies: Short-Term Hydro-Thermal-Solar Scheduling with CCGT Based on Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm

Less

Fast process with great and easy communication with the editorial team. We do not feel lost and abandoned like in other major publishers, where it takes so much effort and time to contact anyone.

Article in Energies: Forecasting East and West Coast Gasoline Prices with Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms

Less

The provided assistance by the responsible personnel of MDPI in the development of a Special Issue has been very efficient.

Special Issue in Energies: Development of Electrical Machines: Latest Studies and Future Prospects

Less

Algorithms handled my manuscript efficiently, enlisted excellent reviews, performed meticulous copy-editing and published it speedily. I have adopted it as a preferred outlet for my research.

Article in Algorithms: Three-Way Alignment Improves Multiple Sequence Alignment of Highly Diverged Sequences

Less

Publishing our research with Algorithms was a rewarding experience. The peer-review process was quick and thorough, providing us with constructive feedback that significantly improved our paper. We are grateful to the reviewers and the editorial team for their professionalism and support. We greatly appreciate the clear and efficient handling of our publication.

Article in Algorithms: Advancing Pulmonary Nodule Diagnosis by Integrating Engineered and Deep Features Extracted from CT Scans

Less

Publishing with the journal Algorithms from MDPI has been an excellent experience. The review process offered us valuable and insightful feedback, allowing us to significantly improve the quality of our paper. The editorial team was responsive and provided all necessary information, while the proofreading and publishing process was managed efficiently and supportively. Based on this positive experience, I highly recommend Algorithms to any colleague seeking a journal that offers a rigorous and constructive publishing journey.

Article in Algorithms: Numbers Do Not Lie: A Bibliometric Examination of Machine Learning Techniques in Fake News Research

Less

My experience of publishing with the journal Algorithms from MDPI has been exceptional, starting from the review process through which we have received a series of constructive and insightful feedback - which has significantly improved the quality of our paper; continuing with the editorial team - which has responded prompt and clear to our needs; and ending with the proofreading and publishing process - which has been done in a supportive and efficient manner. Given this positive experience with the journal, I highly recommend Algorithms to any colleague seeking a constructive yet rigorous publishing experience.

Article in Algorithms: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Agent-Based Modeling Applications: A Bibliometric Study

Less

Publishing our article in Gels (MDPI) was a pleasant and constructive experience, given the fast and fair peer review process, which helped us bring our manuscript up to a high quality. We would like to express our appreciation and gratitude to both the professional and kind reviewers who supported our efforts and to the very efficient editorial team.

Article in Gels: Innovative Protein Gel Treatments to Improve the Quality of Tomato Fruit

Less

During the peer-review process, the reviewers made many comments to help us improve the manuscript. Responding to questions raised by professional reviewers invited by the journal can greatly improve the quality of the article, and the editor helped us improve the manuscript conscientiously and responsibly. We thank the editors and the reviewers very much for the reliable peer-review process.

Article in Gels: Novel Environmentally Responsive Polyvinyl Polyamine Hydrogels Capable of Phase Transformation with Temperature for Applications in Reservoir Profile Control

Less