0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 633 views3 pagesCritical Thinking
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF or read online on Scribd
7
AN INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING
by
Steven D. Schafersman
January, 1991 pe coe
http://www. freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking, html Reevmrge .
yn"
Definition of Critical Thinking
Critical thinking means correct thinking in the pursuit of relevant and reliable knowledge about quer Wee,
the world. Another way to describe it is reasonable, reflective, responsible, and skillful thinking
that is focused on deciding what to believe or do. A person who thinks critically can ask ehh only
appropriate questions, gather relevant information, efficiently and creatively sort through this ©#¢>*"
information, reason logically from this information, and come to reliable and trustworthy
conclusions about the world that enable one to live and act suecessfully in it. Critical thinking is
not being able to process information well enough to know to stop for red lights or whether you
received the correct change at the supermarket. Such low-order thinking, critical and useful
though it may be, is sufficient only for personal survival; most individuals master this. True
critical thinking is higher-order thinking, enabling a person to, for example, responsibly judge igher -@/
between political candidates, serve on a murdgs trial jury, evaluate society's need for nuclear y wink
power plants, and assess the consequences of global warming. Critical thinking enables an
individual to be a responsible citizen who contributes to society, and not be merely a consumer
of society's distractions.
¥ children are not bom with the power to think critically, nor do they develop this ability naturally 4
beyond survival-level thinking. Critical thinking is a learned ability that must be taught. Most \eared ",
individuals never leam it. Critical thinking cannot be taught reliably to students by peers or by
most parents. Trained and knowledgeable instructors are necessary to impart the proper
information and skills. Math and science instructors have precisely this information and these
skills. Why? eae
Critical thinking can be described as the scientific method applied by ordinary people to the Sele mained,
ordinary world. This is true because critical thinking mimics the well-known method of scientific
investigation: a question is identified, an hypothesis formulated, relevant data sought and
gathered, the hypothesis is logically tested and evaluated, and reliable conclusions are drawn
from the result. All of the skills of scientific investigation are matched by critical thinking, which
is therefore nothing more than scientific method used in everyday life rather than in specifically Selenite 0hd
scientific disciplines or endeavors. Critical thinking is scientific thinking. Many books and M eveysoy We,
papers describing critical thinking present it's goalsand metiodsos enical or similar to the
goals and methods of science. A scientifically-literate person, such as a math or science
instructor, has learned to think critically to achieve that level of scientific awareness. But any
individual with an advanced degree in any university discipline has almost certainly leamed the
techniques of critical thinking.Critical thinking is the ability to think for one's self and reliably and responsibly make those
laveohgat,
decisions that affect one’s life. Critical thinking is also critical inquiry, so such critical thinkers
investigate problems, ask questions, pose new answers that challenge the status quo, discover 09% ¢verhwrs,
new information that can be used for good or ill, question authorities and traditional beliefs, Chafeage,
challenge received dogmas and doctrines, and often end up possessing power in society greater
than their numbers. It may be that a workable society or culture can tolerate only a small number
of critical thinkers, that learning, internalizing, and practicing scientific and critical thinking is
discouraged. Most people are followers of authority: most do not question, are not curious, and
do not challenge authority figures who claim special knowledge or insight. Most people,
therefore, do not think for themselves, but rely on others to think for them. Most people indulge pink Fer
in wishful, hopeful, and emotional thinking, believing that what they believe is true because they yuvrself) |
wish it, hope it, or feel it o be trae: Most people, therefore, do not think critically. 2
Critical thinking has many components. Life can be described as a sequence of problems that
each individual must solve for one's self. Critical thinking skills are nothing more than problem
solving skills that result in reliable knowledge. Humans constantly process information. Critical
thinking is the practice of processing this! {erormanen MALTON} the most skillful, accurate, and rigorous
manner possible; in such a way that it leads to the most reliable, logical, and trustworthy .
conclusions, upon which one can make responsible decisions about one's life, Behavior, anid
actions with full knowledge of assumptions and consequences of those decisions.
Raymond S. Nickerson (1987), an authority on critical thinking, characterizes a good critical
thinker in terms of knowledge, abilities, attitudes, and habitual ways of behaving. Here are some
of the characteristics of such a thinker:
* uses evidence skillfully and impartially
© organizes thoughts and articulates them concisely and coherently
distinguishers between logically valid and invalid inferences
suspends judgment in the absence of sufficient evidence to support a decision
understands the difference between reasoning and rationalizing
attempts to anticipate the probable consequences of alternative actions
* understands the idea of degrees of belief
sees similarities and analogies that are not superficially apparent
can leam independently and has an abiding interest in doing so
applies problem-solving techniques in domains other than those in which learned
* can structure informally represented problems in such a way that formal techniques, such
‘as mathematics, can be used to solve them
D cai stripa verbal argument of irrelevancies and phrase it in its essential terms nak 19 eastatel,
* habitually questions one's own views and attempts to understand both the assumptions
that are critical to those views and the implications of the views© js sensitive to the difference between the validity of a belief and the intensity with which
itisheld
* is aware of the fact that one's understanding is always limited, often much more so than
would be apparent to one with a noninguiring attitude
© recognizes the falliblity of one's own opinions, the probability of bias in those opinions,
and the danger of weighting evidence according to personal preferences
This list is, of course, incomplete, but it serves to indicate the type of thinking and approach to
life that critical thinking is supposed to be. Similar descriptions of critical thinking attributes are
available in the very extensive literature of critical thinking. See, for example, Teaching Thinking
‘Skills, 1987, edited by J. B. Baron and R. J. Steinberg; Developing Minds: A Resource Book for
Teaching Thinking, 1985, edited by A. L. Costa; The Teaching of Thinking, 1985, edited by R. S.
Nickerson and others; Critical Thinking, Fifth Edition, 1998, by B.N. Moore and Richard
Parker, and Critical Thinking, Second edition, 1990, by John Chaffe. These books are
representative of the genre.