Scribd
Upload
496 views1 page

Common Trial Objections - 0

The document lists common objections that may be made during different stages of a trial, including voir dire, opening statements, witness testimony, cross-examination, documents, closing arguments, and jury instructions. Objections include issues like leading questions, hearsay, relevance, personal knowledge, scope, and improper legal arguments. The document provides a comprehensive reference for attorneys on the various objection types available to oppose improper or inadmissible information presented before a jury.

Uploaded by

larrybirdy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
496 views1 page

Common Trial Objections - 0

The document lists common objections that may be made during different stages of a trial, including voir dire, opening statements, witness testimony, cross-examination, documents, closing arguments, and jury instructions. Objections include issues like leading questions, hearsay, relevance, personal knowledge, scope, and improper legal arguments. The document provides a comprehensive reference for attorneys on the various objection types available to oppose improper or inadmissible information presented before a jury.

Uploaded by

larrybirdy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

COMMON TRIAL OBJECTIONS

A.

1.
2.
3.
4.
B.

Leading
Not relevant
Hearsay
Calls for Speculation
Calls for a narrative answer
Asked and answered
Cumulative
Prejudicial effect outweighs probative value
Assumes facts not in evidence
Lack of personal knowledge (no foundation)
Misstatement of the record (misquoting the witness)
No proper foundation (specify missing elements)

OBJECTIONS DURING CROSS-EXAMINATION


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

F.

Competency to Testify (prior to swearing in witness)


Privilege
Non-qualified expert

Beyond the scope of direct


Hearsay
Asked and answered
Assumes facts not in evidence
Compound question
Misstatement of the record (misquoting the witness)
Argumentative
Improper impeachment
No good faith basis for the question

DOCUMENTS

7.
H.

Identification
Authentication
Relevancy
Best Evidence
Hearsay
Privilege

CLOSING ARGUMENT
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Arguing the law


Discussing inadmissible facts
Misstatements of the law
Expressing personal belief on the merits

OBJECTIONS DURING DIRECT EXAMINATION


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

E.

G.

WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS
1.
2.
3.

D.

Attempting to commit jurors to a specific verdict


Asking about votes in prior cases
Unnecessary probing in jurors background
Questions not going to ascertaining juror qualifications

OPENING STATEMENT
1.
2.
3.
4.

C.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

VOIR DIRE

Improper argument facts not in evidence


Improper argument - Misstatement of the facts
Improper argument - Misstatement of the law
Stating personal belief in the merits of the case
Asking jurors to place themselves in the partys position
Deals with improper subject matter settlement discussions,
insurance, right to remain silent, etc.
Unduly prejudicial/inflammatory

JURY INSTRUCTIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Misstating the facts of the case


Misstatement of the law
Unduly placing weight on certain legal issues or evidence
Failing to give instructions consistent with theory of the case
Failing to give requested instructions
Confusing/ambiguous

You might also like