Performance
Appraisal
Performance Appraisal :
Performance Appraisal (PA) refers to all
those procedures that are used to
evaluate the personality, performance,
potential, of its group members
Relationship between jab analysis
and performance appraisal:
Job analysis      performance        performance
                  standards          appraisal
                  Translate job
Describes work    Into levels of    Describes the
& Personnel       To acceptable     Job relevant
Requirement       Or unacceptable   strengths and
                  performance       weakness of
Of a particular                     Each individual
job
     Question arises?
   Why do we measure performance?
   Effective performance appraisal
    systems
   How do we measure performance?
Characteristics
   It is a step by step process
   It examine the employee strengths and
    weaknesses
   Scientific and objective study
   Ongoing and continuous process
   Secure information for making correct
    decisions on employees
Needs and Objectives:
   Provide feedback about employees
   Provide database
   Diagnose the S & W of individuals
   Provide coaching, counseling, career
    planning to subordinates
   Develop positive relation and reduce
    grievance
   Facilitates research in personnel management
Appraisal Benefits (cont.)
    Appraisals offer
     employees:
      Direction
      Feedback
      Input
      Motivation
Appraisal Benefits
   Appraisals offer the company:
     Documentation
     Employee   Development
     Feedback
     Legalprotection
     Motivation system
Why Appraisals Are Important
•Recognize
accomplishments
•Guide progress
•Improve performance
Why Important (cont.)
   Review performance
   Set goals
   Identify problems
   Discuss career advancement
Steps in performance appraisal
      Establishing job standards
   Designing an appraisal programme
        Appraise performance
        Performance interview
          Use appraisal data
       For appropriate purpose
Process of PA
                      Setting
                    performance
Taking corrective
                     standards    Communicating
   standards                        standards
  Discussing                       Measuring
   results                         standards
                    Comparing
                     standards
 Issues in appraisal system
                 Formal and informal
     What methods?                    Whose performance?
When to evaluate? Appraisal Design?     Who are the raters?
  What to evaluate?                   What problems?
                      How to solve?
  What to evaluate? (Philip Model)
      H         Problem
                                         stars
                children
Potential                            Social
                Planned
                separation           citizen
      L
            L              Performance           H
    How PA contribute to firm’s
    competitive advantages
                       Improving
                       performance
                                      Making correct
    Values and behavior               decision
                        Competitive
                        advantage
Minimizing dissatisfaction             Ensuring legal
And turnover                           competence
Problems in performance appraisal
  1.   Errors In rating
        Halo effects
        Stereotyping
        Central tendency
        Constant error
        Personal bias
        Spill over effect
Problems in performance appraisal
(Cont’d)
1.   Incompetence
2.   Negative approach
3.   Multiple objectives
4.   Resistance
5.   Lack of knowledge
Essentials of an effective appraisal system
     Mutual trust
     Clear objectives
     Standardizations
     Training
     Job relatedness
     Documentation
     Feedback and participation
     Individual differences
     Post appraisal review
     Review and appeal
Appraisals and Discrimination
   Title VII
   ADA
   Other fair employment
   Laws
Discrimination (cont.)
    Failure to communicate standards
    Failure to give timely feedback
    Failure to allow employees to correct
     performance
    Inconsistency in measuring
     performance
    Failure to document performance
     objectively
Appraisal Forms
   Define performance expectations
   Describe measurement tools
   Use a rating system
   Cover specific examples
   Set measurable goals
Measure Performance
   Measurement systems need to be:
   Specific
   Fair
   Consistent
   Clear
   Useful
Measure Performance (cont.)
Systems can be:
 Numerical
 Textual
 Management by Objective (MBO)
 Behavior oriented
Document Performance
   Make sure documentation is objective
   Document performance of all
    employees
   Provide complete and accurate
    information
   Document performance on a regular
    basis
Set Goals….
   Based on job requirements
   Realistic
   Measurable
   Observable
   Challenging
   Prioritized
Employee Input
   Employees take an active role:
       Setting goals
       Designing action plans
       Identifying strengths and weaknesses
       Employees participate in the PA meeting
  Preparation
Employees:
 Review performance
 Think about new goals
Preparation (cont.)
Supervisors:
   Review performance
   Complete written appraisal
   Think about new goals
   Schedule time and place
Start the Meeting
   Lay out agenda
   Talk about money
   Encourage input
   Give good news first
During the Meeting
 Review performance:
  Based on previous goals
  Noting strengths and accomplishments
  Identifying areas for improvement
Presentation Tips
    Focus on the professional
    Give objective examples
    Invite response
    Listen actively
    Create “we” mentality
During the Meeting (cont.)
   Set goals: Based on company goals
   Building on areas that need
    improvement
End the Meeting
   Encourage good performance
   Lay out action plan
   Communicate outcome of goals not
    met
   Confirm understanding
Continuous Feedback
    Formal appraisals
    Informal appraisals
    Open communication
Recognize Good Performance
   Verbal
   Public
   Tangible
   Monetary
Identify Poor Performance
   Act early
   Take the right approach
   Deal with employee reaction
   Handle continued poor performance
Discipline Poor Performance
   Recognize problems
   Talk with employee
   Follow company policy
    Handle Hard Cases
   Reviewing highly emotional employees
   Rating former peers
    Key Points to Remember
   You must conduct objective appraisals on a
    scheduled basis.
   Appraisals tell employees how they’re doing and
    how they can improve.
   Appraisals help create a system of motivation
    and rewards based on performance.
Performance Appraisal Methods
   Individual Evaluation Methods
      Confidential report
      Essay evaluation
      Critical incidents
      Checklists
      Graphic rating scale
      Behaviorally anchored rating scale
      MBO
    Critical Incident method
Ex: A fire, sudden breakdown, accident
Workers       reaction                              scale
A             informed the supervisor immediately    5
B             Become anxious on loss of output       4
C             tried to repair the machine            3
D             Complained for poor maintenance        2
E             was happy to forced test               1
Checklist method
   •Simple checklist method
   •Weighted checklist method
   •Forced choice method
Simple checklist method:
Is employee regular                    Y/N
Is employee respected by subordinate   Y/N
Is employee helpful                    Y/N
Does he follow instruction             Y/N
Does he keep the equipment in order    Y/N
Weighted checklist method
                  weights   performance rating
                            (scale 1 to 5 )
Regularity        0.5
Loyalty           1.5
Willing to help   1.5
Quality of work   1.5
Relationship      2.0
Forced choice method
Criteria                                   Rating
1.Regularity on the job             Most            Least
   •Always regular
   •Inform in advance for delay
   •Never regular
   •Remain absent
   •Neither regular nor irregular
Graphic Rating Scale
•   Continuous Rating Scale
•   Discontinuous Rating Scale
Employee name_________                                Deptt_______
Rater’s name ___________                              Date________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Exc. Good Acceptable                Fair Poor
                   5         4           3             2         1 _
Dependability
Initiative
Overall output
Attendance
Attitude
Cooperation
Total score                 Continuous Rating Scale
                      Indifferent                Enthusiastic
Attitude
           No                       Interested                  Very
           Interest                                             enthusiastic
                        Discontinuous Rating Scale
BARS( behaviorally Anchored rating scale)
  Step 1.   Identify critical incidents
  Step 2.   Select performance dimension
  Step 3.   Retranslate the incidents
  Step 4.   Assign scales to incidents
  Step 5.   Develop final instrument
MBO Process
   Set organizational goals
   Defining performance target
   Performance review
   feedback
Performance Appraisal Methods
    Group Appraisal
        Ranking
        Paired comparison
        Forced distribution
        Performance tests Field review
         technique
Ranking method
 Employee   Rank
 A          2
 B          1
 C          3
 D          5
 E          4
Paired comparison method
     A       B       C        D       E Final Rank
 A   -       -       -        +       +     3
 B   +       -       -        +       +        2
 C   +       +       -        +       +        1
 D   -       -       -        -       +        4
 E   -       -       -        -       -        5
     No of Positive evaluation
     Total no. of evaluation * 100 = employee superior evaluation
   Forced Distribution method
No.
of
employees
            10% 20%      40%       20%     10%
            poor Below average good        Excellent
                 average
                Force distribution curve
 Field review method
Performance            subordinate peers   superior   customer
Dimension
Leadership                ^                             ^
Communication             ^        ^
Interpersonal skills     ^         ^
Decision making                    ^         ^          ^
Technical skills                   ^         ^          ^
Motivation                         ^         ^          ^
Performance criteria for executives
   For top managers
       Return on capital employed
       Contribution to community development
       Degree of upward communication from
        middle-level executives
       Degree of growth and expansion of
        enterprise.
For middle level managers
   Departmental performance
   Coordination among employees
   Degree of upward communication from
    supervisors
   Degree of clarity about corporate goals and
    policies
For supervisors
   Quality and quantity of output in a given period
   Labor cost per unit of output in a given period
   Material cost per unit in a given period
   Rate of absenteeism and turnover of employees
   No of accidents in a given period