100%(2)100% found this document useful (2 votes) 661 views40 pages Packing
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Compressor
Packing
PET TCL
WEEE
Lubrication
TTT
tT)
. [RESOURCES COMPANTTables of Content
Literature
Mechanical Packing
‘Compressor Packing
Breaker Rings.
Packing Ring BT.
Packing Ring BD.
Ring Materials
Lubricated, Semilubricated,
Nonlubricated Packings
Packing Ring TU.
‘Thermal Effects
Garter Spring Breakage
Undersize and Oversize Rods
Tapered Rods
Dirt or Foreign Matter.
Rate of Leakage.
Break-in Procedure
Nonlubricated Packing
il Wiper Packing
Material Selection for
Compression Packing
Lubrication
‘Type of Lubricant
Packing Leakage Control
Problems Associated with
Low Suction Pressure
Problems Associated with
Low Leakage Requirements
Affect of Ring Type on Leakage
Leakage Control with
Distance Piece Pressure
Static Compressor Packing
Compressor Barrier Fluid System
for Fugitive Emmision Control
Barrier Systems,
Cooling Reciprocating
Compressor Packing
Applying Packings to Liquids (Pumps)
High Pressure Packings
Packing Ring Arrangements
ee eee oe
12
12
12
44
15
16
7
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
27
28
35
36
36
Illustration
Packing Nomenclature
Pressure Drop Across Rings
Packing Ring Type P & PA
Packing Ring Type BT.
Packing Ring Type BD.
Packing Ring Type BTR
Packing Ring Type TR.
Packing Ring Type C
Packing Ring ‘Type CR
Packing Ring Type TU
Packing Ring Type TUU.
Packing Ring Type WB.
Packing Ring Type E.
‘Typical Compressor Cycle
Effect of Backflow.
Misfit Rings
Effect of Rod Taper.
Causes of Ring Leakage
‘Typical Oll Wiper Packing
Material Selection Chart
Rod Specifications
Friction Force on Ring
‘Axially Loaded Rings.
Venting
Buffered Packings
Rings Used at Low Pressure
Distance Piece Buffering
Static Pac
Barrier System Seals
Nomenclature
‘Typical Cooling Methods
Pressure on Ring Faces.
Friction Loads.
Coefficient of Friction
Friction Foree—BTU/Min.
Cooling Requirement Examples
Pump Packings
High Pressure Packings
Packing Ring Arrangements
Seemmyioonneenne
u
14
14
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
27
27
28
29
29
30
31
32
35
35
36Mechanical Packing
Over a century ago, Charles
Lee Cook designed the first
packing to restrict the leakage of
‘steam around the rods in steam
locomotives. Today, Cook sealing
devices are used in compressors,
engines, pumps, valves—almost
any device with a rotating or
reciprocating shaft that has
the potential to leak liquid
or gas.
A “mechanical” packing is a
seal around a shaft passing
‘through a cylinder or pressure
vessel head. It consists of one
or more rings contained within
a case that is typically bolted
to that head. Packing rings may
be used for a variety of purposes,
from simply wiping oll off a
shaff, to sealing an aggressive
fluid at high pressure. Packing
may be as basic as one ring in
‘a case, or it may be an assembly
consisting of a number of
different type rings in a case
that might have provision for
lubrication, venting, purging,
cooling or heating.
How well a packing seals is
determined by how closely its
shape conforms to the rod. and
the dimensional accuracy of
rings and sealing surfaces of
the packing case. Packing life
fs primarily a function of the
materials with which it is
produced, all other factors
being equal.
Cook packing is precision
manufactured with surface
characteristics measured
in millionths of an inch.
Materials are evaluated in
Cook's in-house testing facility
‘Mechanical Packi
for their ability to resist wear
and corrosion under the most
severe conditions. Only those
with a demonstrated superiority
are offered as Cook materials
and many formulations are
proprietary, having been
developed for specific
applications,
‘The Cook Advantage is essen-
tially the ability to design and
manufacture packing compo-
nents to meet modern seal
requirements, and to provide
materials for optimum packing
life. With over a century of
experience, C. Lee Cook is the
recognized leader for engineered
sealing devices, and countless
customers have learned to...
“Count on Cook When the
Pressure’s On!”
Figure 1
Packing NomenclatureCompressor Packing
Compressor Packing
A typical compressor packing
consists of a series of seal rings
in which each ring is meant to
stop or restrict the flow of gas
Into the distance piece. The rings
are held in separate grooves,
or cups within a packing case.
Each ring seals against the
piston rod and also against
the face of the packing cup at a
right angle to the rod axis. The
rings are free to move radially,
Iterally “floating” within the
grooves.
A basic packing arrangement
consists of:
1) a pressure breaker that
functions as a flow restricter
(rather than a true sealing
ring),
2) several seal rings that
are meant to stop flow
or leakage into the vent
or distance piece, and
3) a vent control ring that
prevents gas from leaking
into the distance piece
from the vent.
Even though seal rings do
not provide a direct leak path,
‘a vent to carry incidental leak-
‘age away from the packing is
necessary in most applications
since misalignment of the ring
with the case or rod, or slight
imperfections in the materials in
the mating components, may
allow some small volume of gas
to blow-by,
Gas flow through a restriction
creates a pressure drop. When
there is a series of restrictions,
the resultant total pressure
drop can be significant. This is
called the “labyrinth” effect.
Gas flow past a series of rings
also creates a pressure differ-
ential, but because of the rapid
rise and fall of pressure within
the compressor cylinder, and
because of low leakage past the
rings, the “labyrinth” effect is
usually negligible.
‘Typical pressure levels in a
5 ring case are illustrated in
Figure 2. The curves represent
calculated values for a new
packing (which should have very
small leak paths) compared to a
“used” packing set. The number
on each curve represents the
pressure upstream of that
particular ring.
‘The two sets of curves illustrate
how the pressure drop is highest
across rings nearest the pressure
when the set is new. As the
packing wears, the downstream
rings see more and more pres-
sure drop as the leak paths of
the rings increase with age.
Figure 2
Pressure Drop Across Rings
1000
New Rings:
Pressure Breakers
QE
Zero End Clearance
End Clearance‘The “used” packing curves are
also typical of the pressure drop
across a leaky new packing set.
It is apparent that a “rev-
erse” drop exists across some
rings during the suction stroke:
that is, gas will flow back out
of the case toward the cylinder
during that portion of the stroke.
The pressure drop through a
series of rings is highest across
the one ring that forms the
best seal. In packing sets con-
taining well-made rings which fit
the rod and grooves properly,
the ring nearest the cylinder
will, initially, carry almost the
full pressure drop. As this ring
wears, or changes for any
reason, the load will shift to
one of the other rings, usually
the next ring in line. The
pressure drop may distribute
across a series of rings in almost
Individual rings in a packing set
wear one-at-a-time, so the num-
ber of rings in the set influences
packing life but has little effect
on leakage.
In a comparison of piston
rings and packing rings, it
should be noted that piston
rings in a compressor cylinder
are usually not true seal rings;
that is, they have definite “open”
Jeak paths by design. This means
the pressure drop will be spread
over all of the rings (they act as.
a labyrinth). This division of the
oad, plus a lower total pressure
differential across the piston
ring set, results in a lighter
loading for piston rings when
compared to packing rings.
Breaker Ring
Breaker Rings
Breaker rings, the simplest form
of packing rings, are designed to
restrict or control flow rather than
effect a tight seal. In type P, the
flow controlling orifice is the gap
that is formed at the segment
ends. In a type PA Breaker, the
orifice is formed by clearance
between the ring bore and rod.
‘The performance of both rings
is very similar. However, a type
PA Breaker provides lower rod
loading than a P, at the expense
of a more difficult-to-control
orifice area.
‘The most important function
of Breakers is to retard rapid
expansion of gas from within
the packing case back into the
cylinder during the suction
stroke. On the intake portion
of the stroke, gas contained
Figure &
Packing Ring Type BT
Side Clearance
Pressure Side
Radial Cut
Packing Ring Type BD
\_Butertangent Cut
‘Butt/Tangent cutwithin the packing case tends
to reverse direction and flow
toward the cylinder where the
pressure is dropping rapidly
to suction pressure levels.
Without some restriction to
this flow an “exploding” action
of the rings may occur causing
premature ring failure and
damage (Refer to Figure 15)
Pressure Breakers are not
required in all packing. They
are generally not needed at
pressures below 300 psi and
are not required when the
seal rings themselves act
to restrict backflow.
Pressure Breakers may be
constructed with any currently
available material, but those
materials with a low thermal
coefficient of expansion and
high stiffness are preferable
for a stable orifice area. Metal
Js usually superior to TFE in
this respect: however, breakers
can be made satisfactorily
from some of the high
strength plastics.
Packing Ring Type BT
‘The BT packing ring is a true
sealing ring set which is made
up ofa radially cut ring (facing
the high pressure side) and a
second, butt/tangent cut ring.
‘The individual rings are doweled
together so that the inner butt
cuts of the butt/tangent cut
ring are offset, or staggered,
‘Common Packing Ring Features/Packing Ring “BT” & “BD”
to be between the radial cuts of
the first ring in the pair. In this
manner, gas passage by or
through the ring is prevented,
In order for these rings to
operate satisfactorily, it is
necessary that both fit the
rod perfectly (“X* in Fig. 4)
‘They must contact each other
at their mating faces and the
tangent ring must lie flat against
the groove surface (‘Y" in Fig, 4).
In addition to this, all sealing
edges must be sharp and square
(BY in Fig. 4). If these edges are
beveled or rounded, they form
a path for gas flow from the
radial cut in the first ring to
the radial portion of the cut
in the butt/tangent ring. If the
tangential edges are not square,
they form a passage from the
outside toward the radial cut at
the bore. All other edges (such
as point “A” in Fig. 4) are gen-
erally given small bevels to
assist lubrication between the
contact faces. Under ordinary
circumstances, lubrication
serves to help the seal function
because it fills up minute
crevices. This type of ring is
single acting, or directional,
{in that it seals pressure from
one side only.
Packing Ring Type BD
‘The BD packing ring set is
“double acting”, meaning it
will seal pressure from either
direction. It consists of two
butt/tangent cut rings doweled
so that the radial portion of the
cuts are staggered, blocking
any flow path for leakage. All of
the features that are important
for successful operation of the
“single acting” BT ring, such
as square sealing edges and
proper face contact between
rings, rod and cup, are also
important for successful
‘operation of the BD ring
Common Packing
Ring Features
‘The P, BT, and BD are the
three most common types
of packing rings in general use.
Numerous variations of these
three exist. but the principles
involved are generally the same
and conditions affecting proper
operation are common to all types.
Packing rings are made in
segments for two reasons:
1) for installation over the rod,
2) to allow free radial move-
ment down against the rod.
Free radial movement allows
for slight size variations and
also provides a means to acco-
modate ring wear. Both spring
and gas pressure loading cause
rings to contract, or move radial-
ly inward, toward the rod.All types of packing rings are
manufactured with an initial
“end clearance” of sufficient
size that no adjustment is
required throughout their
useful life. When they have
worn to a point where the ends
butt, they should be discarded.
In most rings end clearance
could be adjusted to maintain
the proper opening. However,
It is seldom practical to rework
such a ring after it has operated
in a butted condition. The bore
will be worn out of round, and
merely recreating end clearance
will not correct poor rod contact.
Ring Materials
Lubrication and gas pressure
are two of the factors that
influence selection of ring
material. With respect to lubri-
cation, packing may operate at
conditions that vary from full
or normal lubrication all the
way to dry or nonlube service.
‘Common materials used in
packing fall into two categories:
1) metallic - (typically bronze,
cast iron, or to a diminish-
ing extent, babbitt) which
require some lubrication
but may be used at very
high pressure,
2) nonmetallic - (typically
carbon-graphite, TFE,
or other plastics).
‘The important advantage
of nonmetallics is their ability
to run in poorly lubricated
applications.
Carbon-graphites and
‘TFE blends work well in
Ring Material
the complete absence of lubrica-
tion, but are somewhat limited
insofar as the pressure at which
they can be used, due to thelr low
strength (compared to metallies)
Filled TFE blends are good to
approximately 800 psi; but,
with the addition of a backup.
or anti-extrusion ring, can be
used at much higher pressures.
Carbon-graphites are moderate-
ly strong, but somewhat brittle,
and therefore limited to approx-
imately 1500 psi.
Plastic is the material of
choice for rings which require
a high degree of conformability.
All rings must conform at their
Joints and around the rod in
order to establish a good seal,
but some types will begin to
Jeak slightly as they wear or as,
they change
Figure 6
Packing Ring Type BTR
Figure 7
Packing Ring Tyne TR
‘Both Rings have Zero End Gapsize due to thermal expansion,
With regard to sealing, a good
ring material is one that is not
excessively stiff relative to the
pressure acting on it.
Nonmetallic materials, includ-
ing the new plastics and blends
with performance improving
fillers, are the most commonly
used materials in the manufac-
ture of modern packing rings.
Metallics are principally useful
at high pressure, or as anti-
extrusion rings, where strength
or rigidity is an important
requirement.
Lubricated,
Semilubricated
& Nonlubricated
Packing
Packing rings made with TFE
Lubricated, Semilubricated & Nonlubricated Packing
“filled” or blended with other
materials (including other plas-
tics) can now be used in many
applications including those
with less than full lubrication.
By definition, LUBRICATED
PACKING receives just the
amount of lubrication required
for long life. SEMILUBRICATED
PACKING is that which receives
either reduced lubrication
through a lubricator or, in the
event there is a short distance
plece, minimal lubricant carry-
over from the crankcase. Packing
installed under these conditions
Is sometimes operated initially
(the first 24 hours or so) with
normal “force feed” lubrication.
NONLUBRICATED PACKING is
packing installed in systems
where double distance pieces,
rod oil slingers, or some
other means is used to prevent
any lubrication from reaching
the rod rings.
‘TFE is the material used most
often for packing installed under
conditions where lubrication is
impaired or less than normal.
Generally, this would be in the
presence of corrosives, diluting
liquids, or high temperatures.
‘The sealing principles of all
‘TFE ring types are virtually the
same as those previously
described. Due to their
inherent flexibility, TFE rings
have the added advantage of
immediate sealing without
requiring break-in.
Ring types TR and BTR are
designs that include nonmetallic
rings plus a rigid back-up ring
Figure 8
Packing Ring Type C
End Gap
Zero End
‘Clearance
Packing Ring Type CR
RSS
Zero End Gap‘The back-up ring is made
slightly larger than the rod
It has butted ends and does
not grip (or grips lightly) the
rod under pressure loading
Its function is to prevent,
extrusion of the softer nonmetal-
lic ring and also, when condi-
tions warrant, to conduct heat
away from the rod surface
through the light contact.
Usually back-up rings are
made of metal, but they can also
‘be manufactured from strong
plastics for some applications.
‘The pressure limitation of plastic
rings with metal back up has not
‘been determined. This configura-
tion has been used successfully
up to 50,000 pst.
At pressures above 800 psi,
type TR rings are the preferred
alternative to the standard BT
Lubricated, Semilubricated & Nonlubricated Packin:
sealing ring, To obtain a better
seal where there is insufficient
pressure to properly actuate
the TR ring, type BTR rings may
be used. The BTR is limited to
relatively low pressure
of about 2500 psi. Above this
pressure, deformation may
occur intruding into the gap
of the butt/tangent cut ring,
To overcome sealing problems
with the TR and deformation of
the BTR, a tangent cut may be
combined with a radial cut ring.
‘This is the type C, or when a
backup is added, the type CR.
‘These styles are most useful
when applied above 2500 psi.
‘The basic TFE ring set
for pressures below 800 psi
consists of BT rings to seal
cylinder pressure with a double-
acting BD ring downstream
of the vent. This arrangement
is the same for nonlubricated
or fully lubricated cases. When
pressure exceeds 800 psi and
the application fs lubricated
or semilubricated, the arrange-
ment should be as follows:
1) one breaker ring type P,
2) BIR or TR rings in
intermediate grooves,
3) a BD ring beyond the
atmospheric vent.
Unless some special condition
exists, the P and BD rings
should be metal, and the BTR
or TR rings a combination of
metal-TFE.
‘The type P ring in this case
will have an added function.
Along with preventing back-
flow, garter spring breakage,
Figure 10
Packing Ring Type TU
Figure 11
Packing Ring Tyne TUU
y
IRSPacking Ring Type TU
etc., the fact that it is in contact
with the rod around the entire
circumference (without heavy
pressure loading) allows it to
function as a means of dis-
sipating heat. BD rings may
be made of metal for this
Packing Ring Type TU
‘The TU ring set is essentially
the same as the TR ring set,
except the radially cut ring in
the TR has been replaced with
an uncut ring, which can be
either plastic or metal.
When the stiffness of the uncut
U ring is low compared to the
pressure acting against the ring,
it will collapse inwardly, main-
taining a seal even as it wears.
With the proper choice
of material, the TU ring set
will seal low pressure (suction),
with the tangentially cut ring
and high pressure (discharge)
with the uncut ring, The TR
ring set will function in the
same manner but lacks the
almost perfect seal charac-
teristics of the uncut ring
in the TU set.
‘An added benefit with an
uncut ring is reduced contact
pressure between the ring bore
and the rod. Compressive stress
in the ring acts counter to gas
pressure against the ring's
outside diameter, so there is
‘lower ring-to-rod loading than
there would be with the tangen-
tially cut ring,
To prevent extrusion of the
soft plastic sometimes used in
the U ring, an additional back-
up ring can be added to form
the TUU style. Typically the
second U ring would be metal,
or a very rigid plastic.
With proper choice of materials
for the three rings in the TUU,
each ring can be made to seal
only over a particular pressure
range. Thus wear and heat
generation can be divided over
individual rings to give better
performance and longer life.
‘The difficulty of installation
somewhat offsets the advantages,
lower leakage and reduced wear,
of the TU or TUU ring set. Uncut
rings can only be installed over
the rod end, and with a thread
protector that is no larger than
the rod diameter.
Packing Ring Type WB
Figure 13
Packing Ring Type E
TRISThermal Effects
When rings expand circumfer-
entially due to a temperature
increase, there are usually leak
paths created at the joints. The
effect is similar whether this
occurs in a true tangent-cut T
ring such as the TR, or in a
butt/tangent ring such as the
BT. As it expands, a T ring is
more likely to leak when the
Joint is not covered by another
upstream ring (as in the type
©). Contraction due to lower
temperature rarely occurs,
but if it does. it is much like
having an undersized ring
or oversized rod.
All these temperature effects
can be minimized by using
an upstream radially cut ring
to block leak paths through
the adjoining ring cut.
Thermal Effects and Garter Spring and /or Ring Breakag:
This addition is found in the
Cor CR ring arrangement. These
ring styles are free of unsup-
ported areas where extrusion
can occur, so they're also suitable
for higher pressures and temp-
erature than a BT or BTR.
One method to minimize the
tendency toward breakage and
lack of conformability of both
butt/tangent and true tangent,
or T rings, is to use “bridge”
Joints as illustrated in figures
12 and 13. The shorter, sturdier
segments make the WB style
suitable for service in situations
where elevated temperature and
pressure may cause other styles
of ring to leak or break. The
handling and installation
of the WB or E rings may
present problems due to the
greater number of segments
involved. As with other styles
of ring, the E and WB may be
used with back-up rings to
prevent extrusion along the rod.
Garter Spring and
Ring Breakage
‘Small, sometimes microscopic,
leak paths occur in packing
rings due to the nature of the
material itself. This is the cause
of the “labyrinth” effect across
the rings and the penetration of
gas into the space between ring
grooves.
Figure 14 shows a typical
‘compressor pressure curve
which illustrates the time
required to compress gas
from suction pressure to
discharge pressure
‘Figure 14
Typical Compressor Cycle
oeGarter Spring and/or Ring Breakage
is considerably longer than the
expansion time from discharge
to suction. It is during the
compression time that gas
pressure builds up within
the packing assembly.
At the start of suction the
time required for expansion
is considerably shorter than
that required for compression.
and gas trapped in the case
tends to reverse direction and
flow toward the cylinder where
pressure is dropping rapidly
toward suction level. This can
cause an “exploding” action,
particularly to tangent type
rings, sometimes to the extent
that they strike the inside of the
groove with considerable force
Garter spring damage and ring
breakage may result. Normally
the tangent lip will break at the
point indicated in Figure 15.
Garter spring breakage, and
ring damage due to backflow,
{is usually found in rings nearest
the pressure side of the packing
assembly. Proper application
of a breaker ring is an effective
preventive measure in that it's
built-in orifice slows down or
minimizes backflow from
the case.
Ring breakage may also occur
when ring LD. and rod size do
not match (Figure 16). Rings
will make contact with the rod
at the center of each segment
on an undersize rod. In this
circumstance, pressure tends
to force the rings inward at the
‘tangential point and the resultant
flexing may cause a fatigue break
from the corner where the
tangent and radial cuts meet.
If undersize rings are installed
ona standard rod or standard
rings are installed on an oversize
rod, the segments will contact
the rod first at the segment ends.
Pressure pulsations will then
flex the entire segment. A
fatigue break near the center
of the segment, as indicated
in Figure 16, may occur:
A tapered rod can combine the
stresses of both an undersize
and an oversize rod with the
ring constantly adjusting to the
variations. The stress conditions
discussed here are most impor-
tant for carbon and
other materials which have
low fatigue strength.
Figure 16
Misfit Rings
Proper Ft Ring
WQ
SS)
Undersize Rod or
Oversize RingUndersize Rods
Ifa rod is undersize, but true
in circularity and without taper,
the rings still form an effective
seal because bore contact will
be in the center of each segment
and at this point the cut in
each ring is overlapped by its
mate. This doesn't normally
cause a problem if the amount
of undersizing does not exceed
.002" per inch of rod diameter.
When a rod is undersize, some
additional time is required
for break-in before a packing
will give the best seal.
Oversize Rods
When packing rings have a
somewhat smaller bore than the
rod diameter, the segments touch
only at each end, leaving the
center away from the rod. This
is in line with the cut, or joint,
of the mating ring so that
direct passage for gas flow
occurs along this line. This
condition, if not severe, will
also be corrected by “wear in’,
One problem that may occur
with either an undersized or
‘oversized rod is that lubrication
may be blown off the rubbing
surfaces by the passage of gas.
‘The subsequent “dry contact”
may result in high friction, high
temperature or rapid wear.
Tapered Rods
In the presence of lubricating
films, which help fill (or block)
very small leak paths, a packing
can function adequately with
some slight rod taper. Generally,
taper is found at one, or both,
ends of the rod, the rest of which
is relatively straight. Excessive
Undersized, Oversized and Tapered Rods
amounts of taper will destroy
the seal as shown in Figure 17.
The effect of the rod passing
through the packing case from
the tapered to the straight por-
tion and back, is wear at the
ring’s edges. This is due to the
ring bearing directly on one edge
while over the tapered section of
rod and on the other while over
the straight section. This dual
edge wear leaves a gas passage
along the bore from one radial
cut to the other.
Tapered rods can also cause
cyclic flexing of garter springs
and ring segments. If this flexing
Is excessive, it can lead to spring
and segment breakage.
Figure 17
Effect of Rod Taper
"Dirt or Foreign Matter
Packing will not operate satis-
factorily when excessive dirt
or other foreign matter gets
between the faces. This is just
as destructive to packing as
it would be to a bearing, or any
similar rubbing surface under
high load.
An effective safeguard against
foreign material damaging the
rings is well-fitting packing that
insures low leakage. If packing
is not sealing properly, it will
act as a filter, catching particles
in the packing case where they
proceed to damage all of the
parts. Under operating condi-
tions where dirt cannot be
‘completely removed, hardened
rods. above Re 60, should be
used to minimize abrasive wear.
Special wear-resistant ring
materials will help reduce the
effect of dirt or foreign matter.
‘The selection of materials to use
depends on the nature of the
foreign matter and the
operating conditions,
When dirt is present, lubrication
at two or three times the normal
rate may help keep the packing
clean. Added oil will not only
lubricate and cool the packing
but assist by flushing dirt from
the rings.
Matter, Rate of Leakage and Break-in Procedure
Rate of Leakage
Passage, or flow, of gas through.
a packing set depends on:
1) the amount of “misfit” in
the rings and rod,
2) any disturbances in
the faces, which must
be in contact to properly
form seals.
Under the best of eircum-
stances, packing will weep
or bleed in small amounts
which cannot be detected by
ordinary means. Some of this
escape is caused by failure to
maintain the various contacts
as a result of wear or lubrica-
ton loss.
Some leakage may be due to
gas being forced into the rod
pores or into the lubrication
film by high pressure. This
small amount of gas would
then escape as the rod enters
a reduced pressure area. This
type of leakage is quite small,
almost negligible, in comparison
to that caused by large imper-
fections in the sealing surfaces.
Itis possible to manufacture
packing of extreme flatness and
‘smoothness with lapped, extra
true surfaces (at added cost).
‘This is only effective if perfect,
alignment and finish of the
mating components is achieved
and maintained. The rod surface
4s vital to packing performance
so it must be equally smooth
and true, as well.
If packing is allowed to leak
excessively for a long period
of time, the condition causing
leakage may be difficult to
correct. New rings cannot be
expected to perform satisfac-
torlly if the rod is tapered or
scratched, or if the case has
become damaged in like manner.
Under normal operating
conditions, a period of time is
required for all of the sealing
surfaces to “mate” or “wear-in",
after which the packing will be
virtually leak-tight and remain
0 until normal wear or some
outside influence disturbs
its condition.
Break-in Procedure
Because of the great variation
in operating conditions, i
difficult to outline a universal
procedure for break-in. The goal
is to allow the working parts to
adjust and to come to a satis-
factory seat without overheating
or overstressing contact faces.
Overheating and high temper-
ature can result in the failure of
both the packing rings and the
piston rod surface.Gas pressure tends to increase
the true area of contact between
mating faces. Accordingly. the
best possible break-in would
be at full load under the slowest,
speed available so that frictional
heat is not generated faster
than it can be dissipated.
‘The amount of time needed for
break-in will vary from packing
to packing, depending on the
pressure, speed, and lubrication
Normally, metal and other rigid
materials, require approximately
four hours. Some conditions.
such as fully lubricated, ultra
smooth surfaces may require
up to several days to completely
break in.
Where conditions do not permit
slow speeds
such as with elec-
tric motor drives, packing can
be effectively broken in by grad-
ual load increases. This can be
as little as 10-15 minute inter-
vals, with corresponding small
pressure increases, For instance,
i is better to increase the pres
sure through a 1000 psi range
using 250 psi increments at 15
minute intervals than to run a
full hour with a given load and
then increase a full 1000 pst
for an additional hour.
‘The amount of lubrication
applied during break-in is best
determined by considering the
specific operating conditions
and determining exactly how
the packing is reacting to the
lubrication and the operating
environment, Usual practice
is to lubricate at 2 to 3 times
the normal rate during break
in, The use of special, heavy
lubricants during this period
{is only advisable if some char-
acteristic of the service causes
a lowering of oil viscosity.
‘Typically this would be caused
by something in the gas stream,
or high temperatures.
It is sometimes effective to
direct a small stream of lubri-
cant on the rod immediately
outside of the packing case
during break-in, This not only
ensures better cooling and
lubrication, but also serves
to carry off wear particles
and other debris from the
working surfaces,
Some wear products or fines
are normal during break-in
since the idea is to “wear off”
the high spots or unevenness,
promoting a good, smooth con-
tact between mating surfaces.
Break-in Procedure
At no time should packing,
be allowed to heat to such an
extent that smoke, indicating
high temperature, forms
Packing, during break-in, may
exhibit alternate periods of low
and high leakage. although there
should be a gradual over-all
reduction in leakage. If packing
is allowed to leak excessively. it
if
not impossible, to maintain a
proper lubricating film.
becomes extremely difficult,
Whenever overheating or
other distress signals appear,
the unit should be shut down
and allowed to cool, after which
a restart may be undertaken.
‘Oceasionally several such
restarts are necessary. Time
spent in proper break-in,
however, usually results in
longer packing life.
‘TFE and similar plastics do
not require a lengthy break-in
due to their inherent flexibility,
Full pressure can be applied
after a 15-30 minute run to
make sure there are no mech-
anical problems. However,
some break-in time may still
be necessary for the rod surface
against which the plastic
Is running.Nonlubricated Packing
Nonlubricated
Packing
Nonlubricated packing usually
consists of TFE rings, or, if the
operating pressure is high, TFE
with back-up rings. The back-up
rings, pressure breaker, and vent
ring may be metal, but high
strength plastics are also applied
in many applications.
Most ring materials will act
as abrasives when no lubrication
is present, Therefore, harder
rod material and a finer rod
finish is required. Chrome-
plated, nitrided, or tungsten
carbide coated rods are the
most common materials used
with nonlubricated packing.
‘The choice of rod material. as
with packing case material, may
also be dictated by corrosive
elements in the gas stream.
Packing cases may be plated but water or water/anti-freeze
for corrosion resistance, but are mixtures are the most effective,
more commonly made of corro- Oil offers some advantage as
sion resistant cast iron, bronze, far as corrosion resistance or
or stainless steel. deposit prevention, but is much,
less capable of carrying away
One potential problem in
nonlubricated conditions is the
heat than water.
high frictional heat generated ‘Some compressors incorporate
by the packing at the ring bore. liquid or gas coolant circulated
This heat must be removed by directly against and around the
conduction through the case or_—_rod, When liquid is used, the
rod. Cases are normally cooled problem of effectively sealing
by circulating coolant through —_the coolant is offset by its
channels in the individual comparatively better heat
packing case cups. The channels _ transfer properties.
can be formed internally in the
Regardless of how it is
cups So no O-ring seals encir-
cling the rod are required. or
cups can be made two-piece for
easier disassembly and cleaning.
Almost any “heat transfer
fluid” can be used as coolant,
achieved, keeping friction
low and removing the heat
generated is crucial to long
life for nonlubricated packing
Figure 18
Causes of Ring Leakage
(WY
(oS / => KF
‘Opening Through Joints and Past Edges
A
Figure 19
Typical Oi! Wiper Packings
FN
() sa
Misalignment, Lack of Flatness, or Poor Surface Finish
“
OW! DrainGil Wiper Packing
‘The increase in nonlubricated
applications and the use of
incompatible oils in the same
machine have created the
need for greater effectiveness
in crankcase oil control packing.
‘This need has been met by
designs based on two important
principles which are somewhat
opposed to designs commonly
in use.
The first feature, shown in
Figure 19, is that the scraper
ring on the dry side of the wiper
groove has its drain notches
facing away from the oil source.
This reduces “valving” of oil into
the seal ring groove because
there is less surface contacting
the back side of the wiper groove.
During operation, the lower
part of the ring set is generally
covered with a significant
amount of oil which has been
scraped from the piston rod
surface. The oil collects on the
bottom of the rings before
dropping into the groove sump.
‘This “collecting of oil” on the
bottom of the rings, coupled
with the flat surface of the
back ring in some older styles
of packing, promotes “valving”
action over the division plate.
‘The residual oil can accumulate
in the normal ring side clearance
where it is squeezed out at each
stroke, with some of it being
pumped up and over the barrier,
and some of it being deposited
down into the sump.
‘The second design feature
affecting oll wiper packing is
the fact that the ring’s flat face
is installed toward the wet side
of the wiper groove. There are
no drain notches which would
allow the oll to enter the groove
in any great volume. In most old
style wiper packing, the first ring
is usually ventilated by notches
on the front face.
In new style packing, the rings
are radially cut with minimum
end clearance so that oil entering
the groove is reduced to that
which can enter the small
openings defined by the cut
and the radial clearance of the
case bore around the piston
rod. In this manner, the normal
oil return holes are not overly
taxed by oil pooling or build up,
Also, the oil level never reaches
point high enough to increase
the valving tendency between
the back ring and the
division plate.
‘The second groove on the
compressor side in the design
shown in Figure 19 contains a
double-acting seal ring which is
independent of the wiper group.
‘This rings function is to minimize
Oil Wiper Packi
passage of gas from the distance
piece to the crankcase and also
to block the slight “pumping”
action of the cross-head which
can push ofl past the wiper.
In all cases, the condition of
the piston rod is an extremely
important factor for oil control.
Rods which are scratched, out of
round, or otherwise damaged,
will not perform satisfactorily,
regardless of wiper ring design.
Wiper ring material needs to
be conformable in order to mate
to an imperfect rod, but also be
of sufficient strength to maintain
a sharp wiping edge. Using
nonmetallics with the right
combination of flexibility and
hardness has proven to be the
best approach toward solving
wiper problems.
There are several possible
variations of ring configuration
and design. The final selection
of rings is a question of the
specific task to be performed.
Some packing is intended to
repel or return oil while others
are intended to collect of! and
direct it to separate drains.
Compressors which use incom-
patible oils in the cylinder and
crankcase should have auxiliary
wiper assemblies built into
the main compressor pressure
packing. Regular distance plece
8Material Selection for Compressor Packing
wipers under this circumstance
will collect and drain only crank-
case oll back into the crankcase.
Extending the rod length to
prevent overtravel between
the crank packing and the
main compressor packing is
also desirable wherever maxi-
mum separation of two oils
is required.
Material Selection
for Compressor
Packing
‘Selection of the most suitable
‘material for compressor packing
rings depends on the varied
conditions in which they may
be installed. The parameters
are often interdependent, adding
a degree of complexity to the
decision. For instance, specific
pressure limits are partially
dependent on temperature,
which is influenced by
lubrication, which in turn,
is influenced by the physical
properties of the gas. The chart
{n Figure 20 can be used as a
general guideline, but some
Judgment must be exercised
regarding the over-all service
for which the rings are intended
and the suitability of the materi-
al selected.
In the Materials Selection
Chart, when a material is.
recommended for use with
@ particular gas, more than
Just the corrosive properties
of that gas are considered
In addition to any material
compatibility effect, the gas
may also influence lubrication.
It may dilute or degrade the oil
film, or products of corrosion
(formed elsewhere in the system)
may enter between the seal
surfaces. When either occurs,
the effect can be rapid abrasive
wear or a rise to destructive
temperatures because of high
friction. The proper choice of
material must be made consid-
ering its resistance to attack
from components of the gas
stream, and, more importantly,
its wear properties when there
is poor lubrication and possible
abrasive solids.
Rod materials are not consid-
cred in the chart. However, mat-
erial selection becomes impor-
tant when lubrication is poor
since the rod surface then has,
more influence on the wear of
the ring material.
Material Selection Chart
Bil ecommendes
Lubrication Required al le 3
Ring Material Ter Pressure | & $§/e2|ssiss| =
‘Norm Winimum | Non time | “time” ||, | €| £ |es|88)5
lube Lobe bebe cry | sy | 22/8 /8 6a/82| 5
[Cookroe Laminated Phenolic 350) 1500
Cook Graphite ron 700 | Not timed
Cookmet Bronze 500 | Not Limited
Carbon-Graphite 750 1500
Baboit 300, "1500
Filled Tie Pius Metal Back-up 500 | Not Limited
Filed We 500) 700,
Flled Polyimide 600 | Not Limite
8There are a few rod/ring
material combinations which
are incompatible. However,
hardness is generally the most
critical rod characteristic.
Hardness can be obtained
in the base material or it
may be achieved as a result
of a coating such as one of
the metal sprays, or electro-
plating. For most applications,
especially those at pressures
above 1000 psi, through
hardening or surface
hardening of the base
rod
{terial is preferred,
‘The table in Figure 21
outlines the optimum rod
specifications for several
different service conditions.
Lubrication
Without question, lubrication
has more influence on material
selection (and packing perforn
ance) than any other factor.
When full lubrication is supplied
to the packing, and nothing
in the gas stream affects its
operation, then any of the
available materials will operate
satisfactorily. All are capable
of operating with full lubrication.
When minimum lubrication is
present, the choices are nar
rowed: and with nonlubricated
service, there are even fewer
choices of material
Full lubrication, of course,
means that oil of the proper
viscosity is applied at the proper
flow rate. Generally. viscosity
for packing above 1000 psi
Lubrication
should be between 120 and
150 SSU at 210°F, while below
this pressure, viscosity down
to 60 SSU at 210°F will be
satisfactory,
‘There have been various
rules or equations developed
by compressor manufacturers
or oll suppliers which relate
the quantity of oil required
for packing to the operating
conditions. Contact your com-
pressor OEM representative for
specific recommendations.
Some packing, obviously, will
require more lubrication than
others because of poor operat
ing conditions, while others,
where the service is not severe,
can operate with less than this
amount
Not Recommended
Recommended only if ga is dry
w‘Lubrication
“Mini” or “minimum” lube
Is used to define a level of
compressor lubrication which
is approximately one-quarter
normal. This level may vary
slightly because it essentially
indicates a level below which
metal rings will not operate
satisfactorily. The lubrication
level then dictates the use of
plastic rings with some self:
lubricating properties: that is.
a material that can operate
almost without lubrication.
‘The small amount of of can be
supplied from several sources.
It can be “accidentally” carried
over from the crankcase, con-
tained in the gas stream, or it
may be due to controlled feed
directly to the packing case.
For pressures below 2500 psi
and a “normal” length packing,
‘one lube inlet per packing case
fs sufficient, Above this pressure,
with oils of recommended
viscosity, and with packing
which does not contain a
bushing, two lube points are
commonly used. Where very
light oils are necessary, addi-
tional lubrication points may be
provided. Ifa bushing is pres-
ent and the case is relatively
long, a separate inlet may be
provided for the bushing itself.
Fortunate
most large com-
pressor cylinders are horizontal.
ensuring that if oil is introduced
at the top of the rod or cylinder,
gravity will take care of distrib-
luting it around the circumfer-
ence. A point often overlooked
is that if the oil inlet is only a
few degrees off top center, the
upper portion of the rod may
receive no oll. Gas flow and the
motion of the rod distribute oil
in the axial direction.
‘The general method for lubri-
cating a rod ts to machine a
channel around the off outlet,
at the packing case bore to cause
oil to drop from the cup bore to
the rod. Even with this feature,
the oil may cling to, or creep
around, the inside of the cup
rather than drop onto the rod—
the bottom of the rod receiving
lubrication while the top remains
dry. To overcome this, a small
‘TFE quill may be inserted into
the oil passage. The quill is only
a few thousandths away from
the rod. Instead of forming a
drop, the quill provides an oil
wick to the rod surface so
there will be a continuous
Figure 21
Rod Specifications
Conditions Rod Materials
Lubricated, ‘carbon oF tow alloy steel,
Noneorrosive through or surface hardened—
‘Below 1000 ps! Re 25 min. 32 RMS
1000-6000 psi Re 40 min, 16 RMS,
[Above 6000 pst Re 55 min, 16 RMS,
Poorly Lubricated,
Noncorrosive Material as above—
‘Below 1000 psi Re 40 min, 16 RMS
11000-6000 pst Re $5 min,, 10 AMS
‘Above 6000 psi Hard coated Re 65 min. 4-6 FMS
Corrosive Hardness and finish as above
in corrosion resistant materiat“moving” film applied. This
ensures that oil will be deposited
directly to the top surface ina
reasonably steady flow.
In all lube lines leading to
packing cases, a check valve
should be installed as close to
the case as possible. Often gas
flow and compression in an
open oil passage will create
considerable heat. The check
valve serves to keep the volume
of the open line small and,
thus, minimize the heating
effect within the passage. Oil
channels within the packing
case should be kept as small
as practical, and with oll of the
proper viscosity, capillary action
will usually keep the lines down-
stream of the check valve full
of oll,
Type of Lubricant
For the most part, lubrication
of packing rings takes place in
the “boundary” region. This is
the area where an extremely
thin lubricant film separates
the ring bore surface from the
rod. The most important factor
affecting film thickness is oil
viscosity. However, other prop-
erties of the oil may also affect
film thickness. For example, low
refined oils or ones containing
oily agents or film strength
improvers are best for any
application where some condi-
tion of the intended service
may tend to reduce viscosity.
Straight mineral-based oils,
are adequate for dry gases at
low pressures; but for gases
containing liquids (water or
condensed gas), compounded
oils or oils with proper additives
‘Type of Lubricar
offer the best lubrication.
Nearly all high speed, high
pressure compressor packing
will benefit from an oil contain-
Ing an oxidation inhibitor and
a film strength improver.
‘There are a large number of
possible additives for modern
oils, and the necessity for using
an oil with any particular one
1s, In most cases, determined
from actual field tests. Usually
the choice of which oll to use is
based on its compatibility with
the gas stream or with other
process equipment, and only
rarely, if viscosity is adequate,
would the oil be unsuitable for
packing lubrication.
When mineral oils are unsuit-
able and it becomes necessary
to consider synthetics, the
Figure 22
Friction Force on Ring
Gas Pressure
‘Acting on Ring
Fiction Force
‘Acting to Push
Ring Off Cup FacePacking Leakage Control
effect on packing performance is
the same as with highly refined
oils. Some of the synthetics lack
the ability to lubricate well under
boundary conditions. Using high
viscosity oils becomes doubly
important; but even at that,
some synthetics will lubricate
so poorly with thin films that
it is necessary to consider
the degree of lubrication as
“minimum” and select a ring
material accordingly.
‘There are a large number
of synthetic oils and some
are more effective as packing
lubricants than others. Normally,
the synthetics are not chosen
because of their lubricating
properties but because of their
other advantages over mineral
oils, such as temperature resis-
tance or process compatibility.
‘Those which offer the least
friction and wear are the poly-
alkylene glycol oils, synthetic
esters, halogenated hydrocar-
bons, and fluorosilicones.
With these it is nearly always
necessary to depart from the
standard rate of application. It
{is necessary to increase oil feed
rate and, sometimes, number
of injection points in a packing
case to help offset poor lubricity
With very expensive synthetics
such as fluorosilicone, it is often
desirable to decrease feed rates
for economic reasons.
Packing Leakage
Control
Relative to the potential sealing
problems that may occur in high
pressure compressors, the
potential sealing problems
in low pressure (50 psi or less)
compressors may seem insignif-
icant. Wear and packing life may
not be major problems, however,
obtaining a good seal between
packing ring and rod, and espe-
cially between the ring and cup
face, may be difficult.
‘There are two reasons for
this. The first is because of the
relative stiffness of conventional
seal rings. As pressure differen-
tial increases across a ring,
some of the leak paths will
be decreased as the ring
deforms. Obviously, using
materials with low modulus
of elasticity, such as plastics,
will improve the seal. However,
even plastics are relatively rigid
when sealing against 1 or 2 psi.
Figure 23
Axially Loaded Rings
We AL oe at
SSSA, BAY
VRORE REE
Nae!
Side Loaded
‘ounat oo
a Toe XRBT
Sey
S zesuch as when suction pressure
4s close to atmospheric pressure.
‘The second reason for leakage
at low pressure is loss of ring
contact with the flat cup face.
Figure 22 illustrates the frictional
forces that may cause a rod to
hold a packing ring away from
the cup. The point at which this
occurs depends on ring size, the
coefficient of friction, and the
pressure level. For “normal” size
rings, approximately 50 psi
differential pressure is required
to hold a seal ring against
the cup.
In a compressor, pressure at
the packing vent is normally
well under 50 psi, so good
practice dictates the use of a
double-acting ring to minimize
leakage from the vent into the
distance piece. This ring func-
tions by forming a reasonable
seal regardless of which face it
rests against. However, there is,
an instant during stroke reversal
when even the double-acting ring
will leak, and in order to improve
on this it is necessary to use
rings which are spring loaded
axially, such as in Figure 23.
‘The advantage of Cook axially
loaded ring types such as the
the AT or WAT, is the almost
equal axial and radial load
provided by the spring. If
these loads are not equal, or
very nearly equal, the ring will
cither “hang” in the groove and
thus leak, or it will be pulled
from one face to the other by
the frictional force.
Problems Associated with Low Suction Pressu
Problems Associated
with Low Suction
Pressure
When compressor suction
pressure is below atmospheric
pressure (when pressure within
the cylinder falls to vacuum),
air may pass back through the
packing and into the cylinder.
Either double-acting rings or
those spring loaded against the
cup face will reduce leakage,
but neither will eliminate it
completely due to the minor
Inconsistencies in the ring
surfaces insufficient gas pres-
sure to make the ring conform.
One solution is to introduce
gas at low pressure at the vent,
as in Figure 24A. The gas that
enters the cylinder will be drawn
from this vent rather than from
atmosphere. The gas pressure
Figure 24
Venting
During Suction
a
Gas To cylinder
During Suction
Vent Gas Supply
‘at Pressure Above
‘Atmosphere
Vent Gas to
AtmosphereProblems Associated with Low Leakage Requirements,
in the vent need be only a few
psi above atmospheric pressure.
Loss of vent gas to the distance
piece can be minimized with
another lower pressure vent
to atmosphere, as in Figure
24B. This more conventional
arrangement will control gas
leakage into the distance piece
to at least the same degree as
with a single atmospheric vent.
When it is impractical to use
a source of gas slightly above
suction pressure, then gas at
full discharge pressure may be
used. This will increase leakage
both toward the cylinder as well
as out the atmospheric vent.
It also puts a higher pressure
load on the ring between the
vent and the distance piece,
or between the two vents, and
will cause more frictional heat.
‘This can mean that for part
of the stroke two rings will be
loaded at high pressure, when
normally only one ring will have
a high differential pressure
across tt.
Everything discussed to this
point assumes the gas used
to exclude air was the same
as the gas going through the
compressor cylinder. There are
circumstances where it is more
practical to use a gas other
than the process gas being
compressed. The usual choice
for this buffer gas is an inert
gas such as nitrogen. If nitrogen
is used and the pressure at
the vent is less than discharge
pressure, then the gas leaked
into the vent or the distance
piece will be a mixture of the
inert gas and process gas. Of
course, gas delivered from the
compressor cylinder will also
contain a small quantity of
the inert gas.
Problems Associated
with Low Leakage
Requirements
In addition to low suction
compressors, where entry of
air should be avoided, there
are a number of applications
where any loss of gas to the
atmosphere must be prevented.
This is true for toxic or danger-
ous gases, very expensive gases,
or in processes where it is
desirable to maintain a constant
‘quantity of gas in the system—
such as within a refrigeration
cycle, for example
Figure 25
Buffered Packings
Recovery Vent
I> (ix of Cylinder
Butfer Gas to
Gas Plus Butler Gas)‘There are several methods
that will accomplish the goal
of minimizing leakage. One way
fs to use a double-vented pack-
ing, figure 25B, with buffering
gas introduced at constant
pressure to the outer vent
instead of the inner vent. The
“buffering” gas is usually inert
or at least compatible with the
atmosphere. Leakage from the
main sealing rings flow out the
Inner vent in addition to some
flow of buffering gas. The loss
to atmosphere of the gas being
compressed is zero and the
mixture of the two gases from
the inner vent can be recovered.
Another way to prevent leakage
is much like the method used
to prevent air from entering the
cylinder during vacuum condi-
tions. As illustrated in Figure
25A, a buffering gas is introduced
through the packing vent at a
pressure which exceeds the
compressor discharge pressure.
‘The result is a gas mixture in
the cylinder as opposed to one
in a recovery vent. In each of
the illustrations, only one ring
set is shown between the two
vents and downstream of the
outboard vent. Depending on
the pressure levels, additional
rings may be used at either of
these two points.
Affect of Ring Type
on Leakage Control
In each of the low pressure
vent arrangements previously
discussed and illustrated in
Figures 24 and 25, double-
acting (BD) rings are often used.
‘When the requirements call for
‘Affect of Ring Type on Leakage Contn
less leakage, one of the axially
loaded type of rings would
normally be substituted. Axial
loaded rings are used for control
of gas flow toward the cylinder,
or into the vent or distance piece,
as well.
Figure 26 shows how the
various ring types are installed
in order to be effective seals in
typical packing arrangements.
It is difficult to relate the choice
of ring type to discharge pres-
sure. However, the choice of ring
type can be related to the pres-
sure differential at a particular
point in a case, and to the
amount of leakage which
can be tolerated
When confronted with low
pressures, the simplest control
method is to use soft packing
Rings Used to Control Leakage At Low Pressure
‘B0 Rings at Discharge L_!
Pressure Below 200 psi
‘Single Acting Seal Rings
‘at Pressure Above 200 psi
BBD Rings at Discharge
Pressure Below 200 psi.
Single Acting Seal Ringe
at Pressure Above 200 psi.
Butter
at Low
) Pressure
Pressure
BD Rings at Discharge
Pressure Below 200 psi.
Single Acting Seal Rings
at Pressure Above 200 ps.
‘Gas Supply
j-— or Vent at
‘Single Acting Seal Rings
‘at Pressure Above 200 pl.
Low Pressure
180 Rings at Discharge ue
Pressure Below 200 psi. | Gas Supply
Single Acting Seal Rings
at Pressure Above 200 psi.
for Vent at
Cow PressureLeakage Control with Distance Piece Pressure
or a lip seal, as illustrated in
Figure 26C or D. The result will
be a tighter seal than with cut
rings. However, packing life may
be somewhat shorter due to a
limited tolerance for wear. In
many reciprocating machines,
lubrication is marginal, and
when this is coupled with
significant rod “float”, there
may be heavy wear in soft
plastic seals. This packing
arrangement, though not
100% effective, may be chosen
for gases such as ammonia,
propane, or methane. In general,
the escape to atmosphere of
these gases may be tolerated
to a greater degree compared
to gases like vinyl chloride or
hydrogen sulfide.
‘The quantity of leakage with
any of the ring types or with lip
seals is difficult to estimate.
‘The best that can be done is
to predict a range in which the
leakage quantity will most likely
fall. This is normally done based
on experience and empirical data
for most ring types. Leakage
paths through packing rings
occur not by design, but due
to tolerances, alignment, and
various characteristics of the
compressor and ring itself.
Although it would appear that
flow rate would be heavily
dependent on pressure
differential, this is not the
case as rings tend to conform
and effect a better seal at
high pressure.
Under normal conditions and
with most gases, leakage from
the cylinder or through any of
the vents will be on the order of
0.1 to 0.2 scfm (standard cubic
feet per minute). As the factors
which cause leakage progres-
sively get worse (misalignment,
dirt, poor finishes, poor lubrica-
tion, etc.), or with lighter gases
such as hydrogen or helium,
leakage rates can be expected
to increase by 2 to 4 times.
‘Once again, this is just a guide
based on measured flow rates
at various conditions. If a more
accurate flow rate is required,
it must be obtained by test
and measurement.
Leakage Control
with Distance
Piece Pressure
‘One method to prevent both
air contamination and/or gas
leakage is to close, but vent
the distance piece rather than
Figure 27
Distance Piece Buffering
T
(il Recoverythe packing case. To accomplish
this, the conventional packing
arrangement, less the atmos-
pheric vent, may be used. It is
also necessary to provide a
positive seal for the partition
packing in double distance
piece machines, or for the
wiper packing in a single
distance piece machine. To
reduce air contamination, the
distance piece vent is used to
supply gas, whereas when it is
required to control leakage, the
distance piece vent will be used
to recover gas.
In either case, one type of
partition or wiper packing seal
arrangement is illustrated in
Figure 27A. It consists of side-
loaded rings between which a
buffering liquid (normally oil),
or more commonly buffer gas, is
injected. When oil is used,
it is generally taken from the
crankcase. Part of the leakage
past this seal goes back into
the crankcase, while part must
be recovered from the distance
piece. In the event a buffer gas
is used, it must be one that is,
tolerated in the crankcase and
suitable for mixing with the
recovered gas. When two distance
pieces are used, the second one
can be pressurized to serve
the same function as the AL
ring arrangement shown in
Figure 27A.
In nearly every instance where
as is used in the distance piece
to control leakage, the process
pressure is very low which
usually requires the use of
axially loaded rings.
Leakage Control with Distance Piece Pressun
‘The methods previously
described are the more com-
mon ways of controlling leakage.
‘There are several reasons for
wanting to do so including
economic, ecological, safety or
to control odor. There are other
methods, basically variations of
those previously discussed,
used for controlling leakage not
only in reciprocating compres
sors, but in a wide variety of
applications such as rotary
seals, pumps, engines, “clean”
rooms, and process vessels.
‘The basic principle remains
the same in all applications:
‘The prevention of gas flow in one
direction along some particular
path is accomplished by estab-
lishing pressure conditions that
cause gas to flow in the opposite
direction along that same path.
Gas Buffer Inlet
Double Distance Piece‘Static Compressor Sealing
Static Compressor
Sealing
In some applications, after a
compressor stops, it is desirable
to maintain pressure within
the cylinder. Rod packing will
generally leak slightly more
when rod motion is stopped as
compared to when it is moving,
‘This is due to a number of
factors; loss of oil which filled
the leak paths, changes in the
ring shape as the ring cools,
and changes in rod alignment
as the temperature changes.
To eliminate leakage through
the packing rings, a product
called the “Static Pac” is avail-
able in "kit" form to adapt to
existing cases, or it can be
supplied as part of the original
design. The Static Pac is essen-
tially an uncut, conformable
ring which is forced against
the rod by a piston when the
‘compressor is stopped. Actuation
‘occurs when pressurized gas
is admitted to the piston. The
piston stroke is approximately
1/4”, and when actuated,
wedges the seal ring inward
against the rod. The shape of
the seal is such that pressure
from within the cylinder will
cause the seal to move away
from the rod when actuating
pressure is lowered.
A typical packing case
containing the Static Pac is
illustrated in Figure 28. The
minimum pressure required to
actuate the Static Pac seal is
one-half cylinder pressure. It is
often convenient however, to
use up to full cylinder pressure,
‘When the compressor is in
operation and after it has
stopped, a three way valve
would be opened, admitting
pressurized gas behind the
internal piston. Pressure must
be maintained to the Static Pac
for as long as it Is desirable to
seal the cylinder. Deactuation
would take place when the
valve is opened to atmosphere,
reducing pressure on the pis
ton and allowing the springs to
push the piston back away from
the seal. The seal itself would
then lift from the rod surface.
‘Avent to atmosphere (or some
other low pressure area) must
be located downstream of the
Static Pac in order for seal
actuation to occur or for
seal release.
‘The Static Pac can be adapted
for pressures up to approximate-
ly 2000 psi. The seal itself is
made of relatively soft synthetic
rubber for pressures up to 700
psi or Teflon for pressures
above that.
Leakage from a cylinder may
occur through the packing case
itself as well as the rings. When
the Static Pac is installed, other
areas for potential leakage
should be checked. It may be
necessary to “lap” the case
mating faces or install O-rings
between the individual cups.
Piping, cylinder heads, and any
gasketed joint are possible leak
points which must be sealed if
the gas is to be kept within
the cylinder:
‘The Static Pac is excellent
for overcoming the loss of gas
through valves used to isolate
a compressor from the pipeline.
Often these valves leak and
while the compressor is not
operating, gas may flow through
the valves, back through the
cylinder and packing to atmos-
phere. The Static Pac will pre-
vent this from occurring.
Possible uses for the Static Pac
Include any application where it
Is desirable to eliminate the loss
of an expensive gas or to prevent
an objectionable gas from escap-
Ing to atmosphere. The Static
Pac may be used in conjunction
with special vented or buffered
packing to provide an overall
seal arrangement that can
achieve very close to 100%
leakage control.Compressor Barrier Fluid Systems for Fugitive Emissions Control and Barrier System
Compressor Barrier Barrier Systems
Fluid Systems
the vent which normally
ABCooling Reciprocating Compressor Packing
the barrier seal and become fugi-
tive emissions outside the packing
flange. These may measure as
much as 200 ppm but generally
are much lower. Gas transported
by the oil film or rod surface
becomes important only when
allowable emissions are near zero.
Cooling
Reciprocating —_
Compressor Packing
One of the critical, if not the
most critical, factors in obtaining
good service from compressor
packing is proper cooling. A
primary source of heat is from
the work required to overcome
the frictional resistance to
motion of the seal rings.
‘This is influenced by material
selection, the ring dimensions,
the operating characteristics of
the compressor, and the condi-
tions of the intended service.
‘The relation between cooling
requirements and the various
influencing factors is discussed
here. This is intended to serve as
guide, indicating when special
cooling is required, and to help in
sizing the equipment needed to
provide the cooling. The solutions
set forth are general in nature
but based on basic engineering
principles and empirical data.
Low friction materials, such
as TFE, carbon graphite (or
compounds composed of
plastics filled with TFE and
‘carbon graphite), and other
solid lubricants, have made
It possible to manufacture pack-
ing and piston rings capable of
satisfactory operation in a non-
lubricated compressor cylinder.
‘The frictional characteristics of
these materials are good, but not
nearly as good as when lubrica-
tion is used, The configuration
of the seal rings affects this
somewhat, but even with the
best designs, considerable heat
due to friction is generated.
‘Temperature is a limiting factor
in the design of high speed, high
Pressure compressors. A point is
reached where compressors fail
unless the heat is conducted away
from the rod or cylinder surface
Friction with the packing rings.
although not the only source.
is the major contributor to
excess heat.
‘The primary purpose of cooling
the packing is to remove the
heat generated due to friction
‘Figure 30
Nomenclature
‘A- Area (Fr) Ps - Compressor Suction Pressure (PSIA)
; wn.
eee cosag™
i
st vs
F- Force required to move Rod Deneeet —
Soest Ym ee
FPM Avg. Rod Speed (FL/Min)
the - Film Coefficient (BTU/HE-FE-"F)
‘k- Thermal Conductivity (BTU-FUHI-Fx2F)
1n- Gas Constant
D- Gas Density (LAF)
a- Average Pressure (SIA)
Pa - Compressar Discharge
Pressure (PSIA)
1r- Surface Temperature of Rod (F)
Ts - Temperature of Suction Gas (*)
Temperature Diterence (°F)
Gas Viscosity (Lira
V- Gas Velocity (FUN)
W- Ring With (a)between the seal rings and the
rod. Nearly all the work done
to overcome friction converts to
heat at the ring and rod mating
surface. This heat is transferred
to the case, the gas passing
through the cylinder, the dis-
tance piece, and the crankcase,
Factors affecting generation of
heat, and heat flow, vary from
compressor to compressor making
accurate predictions of the quan-
tities involved very difficult. A
general method of calculation,
coupled with certain assump-
tions, is a starting point that
can be modified by empirical
data gathered in actual field
installations.
This will provide reasonably
accurate results for most appli-
cations. Estimating the effect
of friction is difficult in any
event but especially difficult
for installations with less than
full lubrication.
When a compressor is lubricated
and pressures are relatively low,
friction loads can be estimated
fairly accurately. However, at low
pressures cooling is frequently
not required. At higher pressures
the lubricant film separating the
ring and rod surfaces is, at best,
partially effective and the coeffi-
cient of friction is more difficult
to determine without actual
operating experience and
empirical data.
Examples of methods to cool
cases are shown in Figure 31
Coolants in successful applica-
tions range from oll, which is
circulated by convection, to
Cooling Reciprocating Compressor Packin
special fluids chilled and
pumped through the case. In
‘some instances gas is blown
through the case or over the rod
for cooling.
Currently, the best available
method to affect cooling is to
use a case with internal cooling
channels, shown in Figure 31C,
which circulates water or a
water anti-freeze mixture. Oll is
not often recommended because
it Is ineffective at removing heat
compared to water or water
and anti-freeze.
In a packing case containing
several rings, most of the pres-
sure drop will be across one
ring, For calculation purposes,
the heat generated by friction
can be considered to be totally
from one ring carrying the entire
Figure 31
‘Tynical Cooling Methods
Figure 32
Pressure on Ring Faces
Fluid Pressure
“Metal-To-Metat”
Contact Pressure
‘Acting on Rng Side.
uid Prossure lid Pressure
‘Acting on Ring 0.0. | fet tata To Meta”
—— Contact Pressure
Friction Force F
Acting At Bore
of Ring
Rod Motion
~~
a isaCooling Reciprocating Compressor Packing
pressure drop. A pressure drop
distributed in any manner over
a complete set of rings generates
essentially the same heat.
For purposes of simplifying the
calculations it can be assumed
that the Coefficient of Friction is
independent of load and contact
area, Therefore, equation (1) in
Figure 33 represents the work
required to overcome friction.
Obviously, the velocity of the rod
{is not constant throughout the
stroke, but again the Coefficient
of Friction can be estimated on
the assumption it is indepen-
dent of velocity.
As shown in equation (2), the
work done can be converted to
heat generated.
Figure 32 shows a cross section
of a packing ring arrangement
on a rod, illustrating the forces
and pressure loading. Friction
force is dependent on the
Coefficient of Friction, the ring
dimensions and the pressure
acting on the ring. Reasonably
accurate results can be obtained
using the “mean” pressure
between suction and discharge.
‘A more accurate calculation of
friction force can be made using
an average pressure “Pa” for the
entire cycle, from equation (3).
‘Typical ring configurations
found in packing cases are shown
in Figure 34. These can be broken
down into four groups based on
the load exerted against the rod.
‘Ata given pressure and total
width each group exerts a
different load due to the type
of cut found between the ring
segments. The type of cut changes
Pressure distribution across the
bore of the ring. This applies to
normally proportioned rings for
the most common ring types in
current use. The friction force for
the various ring types is shown
as related to pressure and ring
dimensions,
‘The Coefficient of Friction
normally varies between 0.01
to 0.8 in most compressors. The
lower figure corresponds to a
well-lubricated surface, and the
higher for cases where dirt and/or
abrasives are present. It may
even range higher than 0.3 but,
coupled with high pressure, the
packing is usually unable to fune-
tion and can be totally destroyed.
At very high frictional resistance,
it becomes nearly impossible to
Figure 33
Friction Equations
‘o Fevouren =) 218)
minute = LM
irom P| ove
2) By
(apa
‘Figure 34
Friction Loads
Q OOO
oO
Group B
I
= (x) (0) (Pa) (W) (1.24
©O
F= tr) (Pa) (W) (7+ 5)get rid of the heat generated or
to maintain a reasonable seal.
‘The Coefficient of Friction for
compressor packing is shown in
Figure 35. The data contained in
the table is a result of experience,
tests and other empirical data.
‘This information on f, along
with ring dimensions, operating
pressures, and red speed can be
used to calculate BTU/Min.
generated by the seal rings.
(From Equation 2)
In Figure 36, BTU/Min. at
various products of Average
Pressure times FPM are shown.
Common groove widths have
been chosen for purposes of
illustration. For other widths,
rod diameters, and intermediate
values of Pa X FPM, interpolation
of data in the tables may be made.
‘The heat generated, as men-
tioned earlier, is dissipated
through several means. For
most compressors, the two
major paths are:
1) Through the case or case
coolant, and
2) Through the gas flowing in
the cylinder.
Heat Is lost to gas passing
through the cylinder when the
rod, warmed by friction, moves
into the cylinder and releases
some of its heat to the inlet
gas at suction temperature,
and also during part of the
stroke occurring during
discharge,
‘There are several formulas, or
empirical relationships, which
could be used to describe the
flow of heat from the rod into
Cooling Reciprocating Compressor Packit
the gas, all dependent on the
same factors. One which might
be used is equation (4), the
formula for calculating the
surface coefficient for gas
passing over a smooth surface.
‘The total heat flow, Q, into
the gas, may be expressed as
shown in Figure 37.
Obviously, the rod is not a flat
surface with gas flowing exactly
parallel to it. The gas velocity
and direction of flow vary widely
from point to point on the surface
of the rod. The rod temperature
and area of exposure are con-
stantly changing as well. Any
calculation made without taking
all this into consideration is an
approximation, although a
useful one.
OO!
QO 000
CO
|
Iwi
F(x) (Pa) (W)(7D+.5)
Ft) 0 (Pa) (WN 1.24 +1)
Coefficient of Friction
Various Products of Pa x (FFM)
Operating Conditions
‘Suggested {to use
‘when estimating
eTUMin
[Lubricated
‘Metal Rings
P2000 pst
Pa>2000 psi
Poorly Lubricated
‘Metal Rings.
‘Nonmetal
tH
Non Lube
Jory inort Gases
[TRE Rings.
Nonmetalic Rings
Fine ee
WW DinorSolis Present | 12-7
‘Carton or TFE Rings
Din or Solids Present
‘Carbon Graphite Rings
BBR
bin
keCooling Reciprocating Compressor Packing
Relative values for most com-
pressors can be calculated after
making several approximations.
‘The area of rod exposure can
bbe as shown in Figure 37. The
change in temperature is the dif-
ference between rod temperature
and the suction gas temperature.
Gas velocity can be set equal to
the rod speed,
Using these assumptions, the
expression for quantity of heat
is shown in equation 6. If k, p.
and u are obtained for the par-
ticular gas being compressed, we
can assign values to everything
but the rod temperature Tr.
Rod temperature is one of the
conditions to be controlled with
cooling. Using the maximum.
value of rod temperature will
give the maximum heat flow,
both into the gas and the case.
If the value ts lower, the heat
transfer is lower, and the rod
temperature will tend to rise.
‘Therefore, it is logical to base
heat flow predictions on maxi-
mum allowable rod temperature.
In general, nonlubricated
machines can run with rod
temperatures as high as 250°F.
In lubricated machines the limi-
tation is approximately 150°F.
‘When heat flow into the gas
exceeds the heat generated,
no separate liquid coolant is
required. Experience with
compressors in the field
Indicates that unless the total
heat to be removed from the
case exceeds 20 BTU/minute
per inch of rod diameter, it is
not necessary to provide coolant,
‘Once it is established that
coolant is required, it is
necessary to determine required
coolant temperature and amount
of flow. Usually, one gallon per
minute per inch of rod diameter
provides sufficient velocity
through most cases to ensure
ood heat transfer. The increased
flow for larger diameter rods
absorbs the increased heat
generated and also compensates
for larger coolant passages.
Larger rod diameters generally
have larger cases and thus more
room for coolant passages,
It has been difficult to find a
correlation between the calculat-
ed thermal resistance of a pack-
ing case and the observed heat
rejection rates. Because of this,
coolant temperatures are deter-
mined by first setting the tem-
perature of the coolant as it
leaves the case at about 90°F
Figure 36
Friction Force — BTU/Min. = ae = >
Te fsa | Pair Ys ea Hee
2 [aoemes | sarin | | een
3 femmes | canes | nen [essen
+ some | Sean | sna] a2
5 __heasnen | roam [zara] ssa
Tun aoa
“GENERATED VARIOUS Pa) (FPN GENERATED @ VARIOUS Pa) EFM)
FOR GROUP A RINGS IN 8 WIDE GROOVE TOR GROUP © RINGS IN'38 WIDE GROOVE
fe a | ae | | | fos | Pax FP I |
Bamewe| “acon | sooo | re | ens] | Samewr| “100000 | sooo | 1 | 2x1
7 eso oot saan] [+ sor aot — soot — 000"
2 get tarot aot saat || 2 far yet Naat oot
5 Sst Yeo! soot aot || 3 fort Geet tarot
‘ for ast tant oot || 8 Bat taser soot
5 Sci enor Seat tonsor | |S Ser eter Sat
FOR GROUP A NGS IN 58 WIDE GROOVE FOR GROUP a PINGS IN S8 WIDE GROOVE
1 Bt erst seat soot | | 1 ‘st isso"
2 fei baot aot ever || Bo 2390!
5 Stet boeot Soot rowan | | 3 ear
‘ reat beat tsow!| | ¢
& foot eot ieroot| [8and then calculating the inlet
temperature, assuming the
coolant temperature will
behave this way and absorb
the required amount of heat.
For example: If 200 BTU’s
per minute are to be removed
from a particular packing and
circulation is two gallons (16.6
pounds) per minute of water,
there is 16.6 pounds of water
available to absorb the heat.
200 divided by 16.6 yields a
temperature rise of 12 degrees.
Subtracting this from the 90°F
exit temperature, gives a maxi-
mum allowable inlet tempera-
ture to achieve this of 78°F. A
definite temperature difference
between the coolant and the rod
is required for any given amount
of heat to be conducted from the
case. Using the method previously
outlined, it is apparent that there
are instances where rod temper-
atures are not equal to the 250°
or 150° level for unlubricated
and lubricated service.
‘The influence of materials on
heat generation is illustrated in
a general way in Figure 35. In
addition to frictional properties,
heat transfer characteristics
also affect temperature control.
‘These two parameters are not
the only basis for choosing a
material to be used for packing.
as strength, resistance to the
medium, cost, and wear resis-
tance are also important. At the
extremes of lubrication, choice
of material is limited. With full
lubrication, metals such as
bronze, cast iron, or babbitt are
best. Plastics such as phenolic,
nylon or TFE may be used due
Cooling Reciprocating Compressor Packin,
to conditions other than heat
transfer characteristics. For non-
lube service, filled TFE is usually
the first choice. Filled polyimides
are also excellent but very costly,
and some of the less expensive
plastics do not have the frictional
properties to allow them to be
effective for nonlube service.
Between these two extremes,
compressors operate in mini or
semi-lube service or, as shown
in Figure 35, “poorly lubricated”,
In this type of service it is more
difficult to select the optimum
material to provide the lowest
operating temperature due to
the overlapping performance
of metals and non-metals. For
example; at a certain level of
lubrication, metal rings will
operate at a satisfactory temp:
erature level. However, with a
Figure 37
Heat Transfer Equations
su (2)
(he) (A) (AT) A
60
(4) he =,
wo
rea of Rod Exposure
AT = Temperature Difference Between Rod and Gas
(7) (D) (sy/2Cooling Recipracating Compressor Packing
slight change of conditions, non-
metallic rings may perform even
better. Metals conduct heat more
efficiently and can run in condi-
tions where the coefficient of
friction is a bit higher, whereas
nonmetallics require low frietion
for optimum results. The operator
can enjoy the best of both by
combining nonmetallic seal
rings with a metallic back-up
ring, which not only aets as an
anti-extrusion ring but aids the
nonmetallic ring by using its
minimal contact with the rod
to conduct heat away from the
ring-rod interface.
Itis often difficult to estimate
cooling requirements when
lubrication is poor. The best
approach may be to change
ring styles or materials in the
event of a problem, rather
than changing the existing
coolant system,
Figure 38 contains two examples
of calculated coolant require-
ments. Due to the generalizations
and assumptions made in arriving
at the formulas, the results are
only approximations, as stated
previously. However, designs
often are put into practice in
the field without benefit of even
these rough calculations. Since
‘many problems experienced
with compressor packing stem
from inadequate cooling, the
approximate method outlined
here should eliminate those
problems.
Many machines operate under
conditions that do not exactly
match the assumptions or
descriptions used. They have
features or use materials that
could change to some degree the
calculated values of either heat
generation or heat flow. For
example; in a compressor with
large clearance volume, the
‘temperature in the cylinder may
have an effect not allowed for in
the calculations. Units which
have short strokes will have a
very limited amount of heat flow
into the gas and a more concen-
trated input of heat to the rod
than normal. A good approxima-
tion of this is to ignore the heat
calculated from formula (6), and
plan on removing all the excess
heat through the case.
‘There are materials and material-
lubrication combinations which
provide a different coefficient
of friction than found in the
“Friction Versus Operating
Figure 38
Coolant Requirement Examples
Sones od ah a ar Sing eae
ome eae carat
: : a "
as 8 bt 8
— coe |PaX FRM 1.03 X 10"
is amma =
2 3 [pear rg mm
: 2 estinepsag29
—— a |@ into Gas (trom 64 66
sone Tevoen (RUE
srt au 0
14 14 4 ey
2 wei feat : :
7 a |
ong cow's [Sara in
=e os frecumaleConditions* chart. The area in a compressor. In very high
designated as “poorly lubricated” pressure applications however,
is actually a broad range, and _breaker rings may be used to
to assign one value for the achieve a labyrinth effect and
Coefficient of Friction may be thus reduce loading across
an oversimplification. These individual rings.
oversimplifications can be
corrected by obtaining accurate
operating results and adjusting
the calculations.
the TUU, be used. Most pumps
Applying Packings 0... ow suction pressure an
Liquids (Pumps) eee
‘There is little difference in cases _ rod direction at the start of the
or rings for packings applied to discharge stroke, sometimes
liquids or gases. Within the cylin- results in slight leakage. This
der, pressure rise and fall is more can be minimized by using side
rapid with liquids but this has _loaded rings, such as the TULU.
ttle effect on the rings.
In general, the tolerance for
leakage is less with fluids than
it is with gases so this dictates
that low leakage rings, such as
In pumps where the plunger
‘There Is less backflow out attaches directly to the crosshead,
of a pump packing case, which __ there is little need for a case
means pressure breakers are _bushing, except to serve as an
not normally needed as they are initial alignment aid. In those
‘Applying Packings to Liquids (Pumps
pumps where the plunger attaches
to a yoke attached to drive rods,
there can be greater lateral move-
ment of the plunger, and thus
the need for better bushing guid-
ance. Cases typical of these two
types of construction are shown
in Figure 39.
‘As with compressor packings,
lubrication is all important
because of its effects on wear
and friction. Pump packings can
be pressure fed lubricant in the
same manner as compressor
packings. When the liquid being
pumped has lubricating proper-
tes, the need for additional
lubrication is less.
Cooling effect of liquid will be
greater than it would be with
gas so this usually eliminates
the need for separate cooling
through the case. Actually, some
Pump Packings High Pressure Packings
|
Packing for
Horizontal Pump
=} p>High Pressure (Hyper) Packings
pump packings require heating
rather than cooling to provide
better performance with viscous
fluids or to overcome the low
temperature effects caused by
leaked liquid flashing.
Pump packings can be purged,
or buffered, the same as com-
pressor packings, normally by
adding an "AL" or “ALW" outside
of the vent/drain. The purging
fluid can be liquid or gas. Purging
at high pressure is also sometimes
applied to pump packings to flush
across the rod or prevent entry of
solids or abrasives into the case.
High Pressure (Hyper)
Packings
“Hyper” Is generally taken to
mean over 10,000 psi. Compressor
or pump discharge may go up to
100,000 psi. At these pressure
levels, fluids are usually acting
very much like liquids in that
compressibility is low. The type
of rings used to seal these pres-
sures are similar to those used
in lower pressure compressors
or pumps, but ring designs and
materials must be selected to
withstand high “compressive”
cyclic pressures.
‘The problems (wear, friction and
heat) caused by high contact pres-
sure between ring and plunger
are normally overcome by using
ring sets that act as a laybrinth
and thus reduce the pressure
drop across each ring. Life of
hyper packings is increased also
by high lubrication rates plus, in
some cases, coolant (oll) flow
across the rod downstream of
the packing.
The other principle problem in
hyper packings is containing very
high cyclic pressure within the
case, which Is essentially a thick-
walled pressure vessel. Particular
attention has to be paid to stress
concentrations, such as holes or
notches, that might raise stress
beyond acceptable levels. Com-
pounding of cups, autofrettaging,
or pressure loading the outside
of the case are typical ways to
ensure high fatigue strength
in the case parts. Typical high
pressure packing is shown in
Figure 40.
Packing Ring
Arrangements
Because of the many different
Ting types, there are a large
number of combinations into
which these can be arranged to
Figure 41
Packing Ring Arrangements
a o
~<200 PSI
a Pressure
Pressurerove packings that function
as intended. What is shown
in Figure 41A are the basic
“elements” that can be put
into a set. The only necessary
clement is the primary seal; all
the others would be optional.
Figure 4B is a basic low pres-
sure arrangement set up to also
minimize entry of air into the
cylinder. The vent seals and wiper
would be optional. Not shown,
but other elements that could
be added, would include a Static-
Pac or rod cooling. The use
of all double-acting rings as
primary seals should be avoided
over 200 psi since these can trap
sressuire between them and thus
ncrease total friction load.
Figure 41C would be the
arrangement applied to moderate
pressures, It might, in some
cases, include a pressure breaker
since this is sometimes needed
above 200—300 psi. All the
options mentioned with respect
to a low pressure set would also
apply to the moderate pressure
range.
For higher pressures, options
would again be the same, but
a pressure breaker is nearly
always needed. The different
ring types in the primary seal
would be chosen on the basis
of lubricaton level and pressure
ranges. Quantity of rings in
the primary seal could vary
somewhat from what Is
indicated in Figure 41D.
‘The number of rings required
for any application is based more
on experience that science.
‘The number of rings shown.
Packing Ring Arrangement
in each arrangement simply
represent what Is generally
applied to most modern packing.
Figure 41 represents what
1s currently applied to pump
packings. The most common
variations would be to include
purging.or rod (plunger) lushing.
The number of rings in the
primary seal again is somewhat
variable in that for all pressure
ranges, the quantities would
most likely vary from two
to four.
o o
[0000 sr |
ae aaa) rm
vouwe OS OS :
eT Pa
fae "1200 - 2000 PSI | Ad (1) Ring
war OT)
Purge
[eG ‘88 (2) ings
al
a srannene L2200081 _] 45019) Roe
rar] ree OE |
“parm | #00 0g = 7
a ‘Tuu -
rou Oi
arovide packings that function
as intended. What is shown
in Figure 41A are the basic
“elements” that can be put
into a set. The only necessary
element is the primary seal; all
the others would be optional.
Figure 41B is a basic low pres-
sure arrangement set up to also
minimize entry of air into the
cylinder. The vent seals and wiper
would be optional. Not shown,
but other elements that could
be added, would include a Static
Pac or rod cooling. The use
of all double-acting rings as
primary seals should be avoided
over 200 psi since these can trap
oressure between them and thus.
merease total friction load.
Figure 41C would be the
arrangement applied to moderate
pressures. It might, in some
cases, include a pressure breaker
since this is sometimes needed
above 200—300 psi. All the
options mentioned with respect
to a low pressure set would also
apply to the moderate pressure
range.
For higher pressures, options
would again be the same, but
a pressure breaker is nearly
always needed. The different
ring types in the primary seal
would be chosen on the basis
of lubricaton level and pressure
ranges. Quantity of rings in
the primary seal could vary
somewhat from what is
indicated in Figure 41D.
The number of rings required
for any application is based more
on experience that science.
‘The number of rings shown
Packing Ring Arrangement
sn each arrangement simply
represent what is generally
applied to most modern packing,
Figure 41£ represents what
is currently applied to pump
packings. The most common
variations would be to include
purging,or rod (plunger) flushing,
‘The number of rings in the
primary seal again is somewhat
variable in that for all pressure
ranges, the quantities would
most likely vary from two
to four.
cc) o
Drain
7200 — 600 PSI te Pg
BR PR PR t ¥ 00-1200 PS] Pressure. & A
roe BB A'S .:
er ; PA
ee 1200 - 2000 PSI | Ada (1) Ring
wr ge
| af "2000 - 3000 PSi | Add (2) Ringe r—c[E} a
au | caf
a 32000 Pst] Add (2) Rings wo ff)
000 PS |
00 P51