Scribd
Upload
160 views2 pages

CM Contractor Performance Evaluation

This document contains a contractor performance evaluation for a construction project. It includes the project number, campus location, contract number, contractor, architect, and original contract award amount plus any change orders. The contractor is rated on an scale of 1 to 5 in areas such as scheduling, problem resolution, and timely completion. Major subcontractors are listed. It notes whether the project was completed on time and within budget. The evaluator recommends whether to renew the contractor's prequalification and what future project size may be appropriate. Remarks provide additional comments.

Uploaded by

wesprit
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
160 views2 pages

CM Contractor Performance Evaluation

This document contains a contractor performance evaluation for a construction project. It includes the project number, campus location, contract number, contractor, architect, and original contract award amount plus any change orders. The contractor is rated on an scale of 1 to 5 in areas such as scheduling, problem resolution, and timely completion. Major subcontractors are listed. It notes whether the project was completed on time and within budget. The evaluator recommends whether to renew the contractor's prequalification and what future project size may be appropriate. Remarks provide additional comments.

Uploaded by

wesprit
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PROJECT

PROJECT NO.

CAMPUS

CONTRACT NO.

CONTRACTOR

ARCHITECT

CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT

CHANGE ORDERS: NO.

$ AMOUNT

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION


Rate (as appropriate) on
a scale of:
Scheduling
Coordination of Subcontractor Work
Superintendent
Proactive Resolution of Problems
Fairness in Pricing Changes
Proactive Performance (Diligence)
Timely Completion of Punch List

Timely Pmt/Stop Notices/Complaints

2*
1*
Below Average Non-Responsible

5
Excellent

4
Good

3
Average

OVERALL RATING:
Major Subcontractors/Name:
Electrical /
Mechanical /
Structural /
Framing/Drywall /
Other

Yes

Completed Project Within Contract Time?

Yes

Liquidated Damages Assessed?

Yes

10843 Issued to Contractor?

Yes

Recommend Renewal of Prequalification?

No

Recommend Future Project Size: $


No
No
No

Claims Filed?

Yes

Status of Claim:

Negotiation

No

Claims Review Board


Litigation

*Attach written justification. If subcontractor judged non-responsible, attach separate written report for use in potential ineligibility to bid CSU work.

REMARKS:

This evaluation is based on the impressions of the Trustees assigned Construction Administrator, with information from the Project Architect/ Engineer,
Project Inspector, and/or University representatives.
Signed:

S u b m i t t h i s f o r m t o P r e q u a l i fi c a t i o n C o o r d i n a t o r :
CAPITAL PLANNING, DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION
401 GOLDEN SHORE, LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802-4210

Construction Mgmt.
703.13 10/06

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION


PAGE 2

Construction Administrator

Date

You might also like