100% found this document useful (1 vote)
488 views37 pages

Rocket Parachute Systems Design Guide

This document provides an overview of parachute recovery systems, including basic terminology, parachute types, shapes, and an example calculation of terminal velocity under a drogue chute. It defines key terms like drag coefficient, drag area, terminal velocity, and impact energy. It also describes common parachute shapes like hemispherical, conical, and elliptical, and parachute types like solid skirts. The example calculation determines the terminal velocity using parameters for a drogue chute descent rate, rocket drag area, and parachute drag coefficient.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
488 views37 pages

Rocket Parachute Systems Design Guide

This document provides an overview of parachute recovery systems, including basic terminology, parachute types, shapes, and an example calculation of terminal velocity under a drogue chute. It defines key terms like drag coefficient, drag area, terminal velocity, and impact energy. It also describes common parachute shapes like hemispherical, conical, and elliptical, and parachute types like solid skirts. The example calculation determines the terminal velocity using parameters for a drogue chute descent rate, rocket drag area, and parachute drag coefficient.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

Recovery Systems: Parachutes 101

Material taken from: Parachutes for


Planetary Entry Systems
Juan R. Cruz
Exploration Systems Engineering Branch
NASA Langley Research Center

Also, Images from:


Knacke, T. W.: Parachute Recovery Systems Design
Manual, Para Publishing, Santa Barbara, CA, 1992.
and
Ewing, E. G., Bixby, H.W., and Knacke, T.W.: Recovery
System Design Guide, AFFDL-TR-78-151, 1978.

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 1  


Basic Terminology

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 2



Basic Terminology (2)

For  our  purposed  conical  and    


ellip/cal  parachutes  are    
same  thing”  

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 3



Basic Terminology (3)

Fdrag

Fdrag = q ! C D ! S0
1
q= # !V$ 2 "incompressible dynamic pressure"
2
"
C D = "drag coefficient " V!
C D ! S0 = "drag area"
MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 4

Basic Terminology (4)

In general, under parachute, 2-DOF equations of motion are ….


(ignore centrifugal & Coriolis forces)

V! " V 2 r + V# 2

!
"Vr % $
(
" Fdrag ) ( )
+ Fdrag vehicle %
( sin ) * g '
parachute

$ ' $ m '
=
(F )
drag parachute
$ ' $
$#V!! '& $
*
F ( )
drag parachute + (
F )
drag vehicle
( cos )
'
'
$# '&
+(F )
m
drag vehicle

Vehicle decelerates very rapidly


in horizontal direction

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 5



Basic Terminology (4)
“Terminal Velocity” .. Equilibrium velocity where
parachute + vehicle are no longer accelerating

"V!r % " 0 % " ) * 90" %


$ ' $ ' $ '
$ '( $ '( $ F ( ) (
+ Fdrag ) = m + g'
$#V!! '& $# 0 '& # drag parachute vehicle &

1
! "Vterminal 2 " #$( C D " S0 ) parachute + ( C D " S0 )vehicle %& = m " g
2

2!m!g $
Vterminal = # ( C D ! S0 ) parachute + ( C D ! S0 )vehicle &
" % '
MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 6

Basic Terminology (5)
“Impact Energy” .Kinetic Energy of “hard object” striking ground

1
K.E.impact = m ⋅V 2 terminal
2 ground

Typically mass of soft items like canopy


Are not accounted for in impact energy

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 7



Parachute Types

We’ll  be  using  solid  parachutes  

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 8  


Parachute Shapes
• Hemispherical parachute:
- Deployed canopy takes on the shape of a hemisphere.
- Three dimensional hemispherical shape divided into a number of
2-D panels, called gores
• Angle subtended on the
left hand side of the pattern
is 60 degrees

• When all six gores are


joined they complete the
360 degree circle.

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 9  


Parachute Shapes (2)
• Conical Parachute
- 2-D Canopy shape in form of a triangle

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 10  


Parachute Shapes (3)
• Conical Parachute Gore Shape
- 2-D Canopy shape in form of a triangle

• Higher drag coefficient than hemispherical parachutes, but also less stability

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 11  


Parachute Shapes (4)
• Elliptical parachute:
- Parachute where vertical axis is smaller than horizontal axis
- A parachute with an elliptical canopy has essentially the same CD
as a hemispherical parachute, but with less surface material

“h”

“r”

Canopy profile for different height / radius ratios

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 12  


Parachute Shapes (5)

Comparison of gore shapes for different height : radius ratios

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 13  


Parachute Types (2)

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 14  


Parachute Types (3)

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 15  


Example Calculation: Drogue Chute
Terminal Velocity
hapogee = hagl + hlaunch =
site

(1609.23 + 240 )meters !! 1850 meters


!apogee = 1.0218 kg
m3

3.9860044 " 10 5 km 3
µ
g= 2 = sec 2
= 9.815
r ( 6371 + 1.85 ) km2
2
m
sec 2

Maximum mass at apogee : mapogee = mlaunch ! m fuel = (14.188 ! 1.76 ) = 12.428 kg


mapogee " g = 12.428 " 9.815 = 121.975 Nt

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 16  


Example Calculation: Drogue Chute
Terminal Velocity (2)
• Descent rate under drogue, 50-100 ft/sec

• Go with minimum value ~ 15.24 m/sec (50 ft/sec)

“Vehicle Drag Area” ..


Rocket is broken into two pieces

(CD ! S0 )vehicle " 2 ! #$(CD )rocket ! ( Aref )rocket %& = ( 2 ! 0.35 ! 0.01589 ) " 0.0111m 2

“Double up” nominal rocket drag area

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 17  


Example Calculation: Drogue Chute
Terminal Velocity (3)
• Parachute Drag Coefficient

• Elliptical Parachute .. Take median value

(CD )chute ! 0.76 ± 0.115


MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 18  
Example Calculation: Drogue Chute
Terminal Velocity (4)
• Calculate required chute area:
2!m!g $
Vterminal = # ( C D ! S0 ) parachute + ( C D ! S0 )vehicle &
" % '
m!g
# ( C D ! S0 )vehicle
1
" !Vterminal 2
( ( S0 ) parachute = 2 =
(CD ) parachute
121.965 4 ! ( S0 ) parachute
& 0.0111 D0 = =
"
$ 1 1.0218 ! 22.86 2%
"2 #
% 4! 1.33783 &
0.5 39.37
1.3378 m2 = 4.28 ft
# $
" 12
0.76
MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 19  
Example Calculation: Drogue Chute
Terminal Velocity (5)
Drag Chute Areas Versus Terminal Velocity

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 20  


Example Calculation: Drogue Chute
Terminal Velocity (6)
Drag Chute Diameter Versus Terminal Velocity

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 21  


Example Calculation: Drogue Chute
Terminal Velocity (7)

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 22  


Parachute Opening Loads
Largest Tensile Load on Vehicle … often the Ultimate
Design Load Driver

Design  Tool  

Verifica/on  Tool  
(Direct  Simula/on)  

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 23  


Parachute Opening Loads (2)

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 24  


Parachute Opening Loads (3)

D0 n = canopy fill constant


t inf = n ! k "
V1 k = decceleration exponent

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 25  


Parachute Opening Loads (4)

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 26  


Parachute Opening Loads (5)
Infinite-­‐Mass  Infla/on  

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 27  


Parachute Opening Loads (6)
Finite-­‐Mass  Infla/on  

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 28  


Pflanz’s Method

• Pflanz' (1942):
-introduced analytical functions for the drag area

• Simple, frst-order, design book type method


-Requires least knowledge of the system compared to other methods
-Assumes no gravity acceleration – limits application to shallow fight
path angles at parachute deployment
- Neglects entry vehicle drag
- Yields only peak opening load
- Allows for finite mass approximation

• Doherr (2003) extended method to account for gravity and


arbitrary fight path angles

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 29  


Pflanz’s Method (2)
Fmax = q1 ! ( C D ! S0 ) ! C x ! X1
2!m
Aballistic =
(CD ! S0 ) ! "1 !V1 ! tinfl

(finite  mass  infla/on  approxima/on)  

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 30  


Pflanz’s Method (3)
• Assume “opening load “velocity at
• Drogue Chute Opening Loads 4 seconds past apogee, ~45 m/sec

• Dynamic Pressure ~ 1.1 kPa

• Cx ~ 1.7

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 31  


Pflanz’s Method (4)
Subsonic Inflation time …

D0 n = canopy fill constant


t inf = n! k
"
Vopen k = decceleration exponent
n#4
elliptical parachute "
k # 0.85
0.5
4 $" 1.3378 %#
4

t inf = !
0.85
= 0.2053 sec
45

2!m 2! 12.428
Aballistic = =   ( 0.76 ! 1.3378 ) 1.0218 ! 45.0 ! 0.2053 =  2.590  
(CD ! S0 ) ! "1 !V1 ! tinfl
MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 32  
Pflanz’s Method (5)
2!m
Aballistic = =  2.590  
(CD ! S0 ) ! "1 !V1 ! tinfl

X1 ! 0.72

Fmax = q1 ! ( C D ! S0 ) ! C x ! X1 =
3
1.1 !10 ( 0.76 " 1.3378 ) 1.7 " 0.72

= 1368.9 Nt (307.7 lbf)

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 33  


Pflanz’s Method (6)
(2)  

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 34  


Inflation Curve Method
n
# t ! t si &
FP = q(t !tsi ) " ( C D " S0 ) " C x " %
$ t inf ! t si ('
Ignores  parachute  mass    
(conserva?ve)  

Direct  Simula/on    
Verifica/on  Tool  

Allowing  for    
parachute  mass    

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 35  


Inflation Curve Method (2)

Infla?on  Data    
from  Doherr  

(CD ! S0 )t
(CD ! S0 )steady

" t ! t si %
$# t ! t '&
inf si
36  
MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design
Questions??

MAE 5930, Rocket Systems Design 37

You might also like