0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views11 pages

Case Processing Summary

1. This document contains a case processing summary and cross tabulation analyzing the relationship between distance to health center and antenatal care utilization among 161 cases. A chi-square test shows a significant relationship between the variables. 2. A second case processing summary and cross tabulation examines the relationship between occupation and antenatal care utilization among 160 cases. A chi-square test does not find a significant relationship. 3. A third summary analyzes the relationship between health staff attitude and antenatal care utilization among 160 cases. A chi-square test does not find a significant relationship.

Uploaded by

Fatimah Sitti
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views11 pages

Case Processing Summary

1. This document contains a case processing summary and cross tabulation analyzing the relationship between distance to health center and antenatal care utilization among 161 cases. A chi-square test shows a significant relationship between the variables. 2. A second case processing summary and cross tabulation examines the relationship between occupation and antenatal care utilization among 160 cases. A chi-square test does not find a significant relationship. 3. A third summary analyzes the relationship between health staff attitude and antenatal care utilization among 160 cases. A chi-square test does not find a significant relationship.

Uploaded by

Fatimah Sitti
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

1.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

jarak puskesmas *
160 99.4% 1 0.6% 161 100.0%
pemanfaatan ANC
Jarak Puskesmas * pemanfaatan ANC Crosstabulation

pemanfaatan ANC

ya tidak Total

jarak puskesmas mudah dijangkau Expected Count 68.0 63.0 131.0

% within jarak puskesmas 61.8% 38.2% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan ANC 97.6% 64.9% 81.9%

% of Total 50.6% 31.3% 81.9%

tidak mudah dijangkau Expected Count 15.0 14.0 29.0

% within jarak puskesmas 6.9% 93.1% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan ANC 2.4% 35.1% 18.1%

% of Total 1.3% 16.9% 18.1%


Total Expected Count 83.0 77.0 160.0

% within jarak puskesmas 51.9% 48.1% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan ANC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 51.9% 48.1% 100.0%


Chi-Square Testsc

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 28.703a 1 .000 .000 .000


Continuity Correctionb 26.545 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 32.828 1 .000 .000 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
N of Valid Cases 160

2.
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pekerjaan * pemanfaatan ANC 160 93.0% 12 7.0% 172 100.0%


Pekerjaan * pemanfaatan ANC Crosstabulation

pemanfaatan ANC

ya tidak Total

pekerjaan bekerja Expected Count 11.8 19.2 31.0

% within pekerjaan 25.8% 74.2% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan ANC 13.1% 23.2% 19.4%

% of Total 5.0% 14.4% 19.4%

tidak bekerja Expected Count 49.2 79.8 129.0

% within pekerjaan 41.1% 58.9% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan ANC 86.9% 76.8% 80.6%

% of Total 33.1% 47.5% 80.6%


Total Expected Count 61.0 99.0 160.0

% within pekerjaan 38.1% 61.9% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan ANC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 38.1% 61.9% 100.0%


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.473a 1 .116


Continuity Correctionb 1.868 1 .172
Likelihood Ratio 2.583 1 .108
Fisher's Exact Test .150 .084
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.458 1 .117
N of Valid Cases 160

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.82.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

3.
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Sikap Petugas * Pemanfaatan


160 95.8% 7 4.2% 167 100.0%
ANC
Sikap Petugas * Pemanfaatan ANC Crosstabulation

Pemanfaatan ANC

ya tidak Total

Sikap Petugas Positif Expected Count 75.7 70.3 146.0

% within Sikap Petugas 52.7% 47.3% 100.0%

% within Pemanfaatan ANC 92.8% 89.6% 91.3%

% of Total 48.1% 43.1% 91.3%

Negatif Expected Count 7.3 6.7 14.0

% within Sikap Petugas 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

% within Pemanfaatan ANC 7.2% 10.4% 8.8%

% of Total 3.8% 5.0% 8.8%


Total Expected Count 83.0 77.0 160.0

% within Sikap Petugas 51.9% 48.1% 100.0%

% within Pemanfaatan ANC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 51.9% 48.1% 100.0%


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .500a 1 .480


Continuity Correctionb .182 1 .669
Likelihood Ratio .500 1 .479
Fisher's Exact Test .580 .335
N of Valid Cases 160

4. Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Paritas * Kejadian anemia 129 98.5% 2 1.5% 131 100.0%


Paritas * Kejadian anemia Crosstabulation

Kejadian anemia

kasus kontrol Total

Paritas risiko tinggi Expected Count 3.0 8.0 11.0

% within Paritas 36.4% 63.6% 100.0%

% within Kejadian anemia 11.4% 7.4% 8.5%

% of Total 3.1% 5.4% 8.5%

risiko rendah Expected Count 32.0 86.0 118.0

% within Paritas 26.3% 73.7% 100.0%

% within Kejadian anemia 88.6% 92.6% 91.5%

% of Total 24.0% 67.4% 91.5%


Total Expected Count 35.0 94.0 129.0

% within Paritas 27.1% 72.9% 100.0%

% within Kejadian anemia 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 27.1% 72.9% 100.0%


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .518a 1 .472


Continuity Correctionb .134 1 .715
Likelihood Ratio .491 1 .484
Fisher's Exact Test .488 .343
Linear-by-Linear Association .514 1 .473
N of Valid Cases 129

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.98.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

5.
Mann-Whitney TesT

Ranks

kelompok ibu hamil N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

tekanan darah senam ibu hamil 10 12.05 120.50

tidak senam ibu hamil 10 8.95 89.50

Total 20
Test Statisticsa

tekanan darah

Mann-Whitney U 34.500
Wilcoxon W 89.500
Z -1.192
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .233
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .247b

6.
Kruskal-Wallis Test

Ranks

berat badan balita N Mean Rank

bbb kelompok A 6 7.83

kelompok B 7 11.93

kelompok C 8 12.56

Total 21
Test Statisticsa,b

bbb

Chi-Square 2.230
df 2
Asymp. Sig. .328

You might also like